Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design of a Quadruped Robot for Motion with Quasistatic Force Constraints

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel design of a four-legged “spider” robot capable of moving in a wide range of two-dimensional tunnels. The robot moves in a quasistatic manner, by stably bracing itself against the tunnel walls while moving its free parts to the next position. The design has been strongly influenced by the recent immobilization theory of Rimon and Burdick (1998a, 1998b). The theory dictates the minimum number of limbs such a mechanism can have, as well as the curvature of the mechanism footpads. The class of tunnel geometries dictates other key parameters of the robot, such as limb dimensions and number of degrees of freedom of each limb. We review the relevant components of the immobilization theory and describe its implications for the robot design. Then we describe our choice of other key design parameters of the robot. The spider-like robot will move under a worst-case assumption of slippery tunnel walls, and we also describe a locomotion strategy for the robot under this assumption. Finally, we describe an immobilization-based control algorithm for executing the motion strategy. The robot has been built, and experiments verifying its robustness with respect to leg-placement errors are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boissonnat, J.-D., Devillers, O., Donati, L., and Preparata, F.P. 1992. Motion planning for spider robots. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2321–2326.

  • Chirikjian, G.S. and Burdick, J.W. 1993. Design and experiments with a 30 degree-of-freedom hyper-redundant robot. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 3, pp. 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czyzowicz, J., Stojmenovic, I., and Urrutia, J. 1991. Immobilizing a polytope. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 519, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubowsky, S., Sunada, C., and Marvoidis, C. 1999. Coordinated motion and force control of multi-limbed robotic systems. Autonomous Robots, 6:7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. 1993. How Animals Move. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, London, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, S. and Kunieda, O. 1991. Generalized standard foot trajectory for a quadruped walking vehicle. Int. J. Robotics Research, 10(1):2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, S. and Morishima, A. 1990. Design and control of a mobile robot with an articulated body. Int. J. Robotics Research, 9(2):99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, W.S. and Kumar, V. 1996. On the stability of grasped objects. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 12(6):904–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koditschek, D.E. 1989. The application of total energy as a lyapunov function for mechanical control systems. In Control Theory and Multibody Systems, AMS Series in Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 97, J. Marsden, Krishnaprasad, and J. Simo (Eds.). AMS: Providence, R1, pp. 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Q., Burdick, J.M., and Rimon, E. 1997. Computation and analysis of compliance in grasping and fixturing. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 93–99.

  • Madhani, A. and Dubowsky, S. 1992. Motion planning of mobile multi-limb robotic systems subject to force and friction constraints. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 233–239.

  • Madhani, A. and Dubowsky, S. 1997. The force workspace: A tool for the design and motion planning of multi-limb robotic systems. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 119(2):218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markenscoff, X., Ni, L., and Papadimitriou, C.H. 1990. The geometry of grasping. Int. Journal Robotics Research, 9(1):61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marhefka, D.W. and Orin, D.E. 1997. Gait planning for energy efficiency in walking machines. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 474–480.

  • McGeer, T. 1989. Powered flights, child's play, silly wheels and walking machines. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1592–1597.

  • Nagakubo, A. and Hirose, S. 1994. Walking and running of the quadruped wall-climbing robot. In IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1005–1012.

  • Neubauer, W. 1993. Locomotion with articulated legs in pipes or ducts. In Int. Conf. on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, pp. 64–71.

  • Neubauer, W. 1994. Spider-like robot that climbs vertically in ducts or pipes. In IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vol. 2, pp. 1178–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, F., Chernousko, F. Bolotnik, N., Robmann, T., and Kostin, G. 2000.Tube-crawling robot: Modeling and optimization. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation. Submitted for publication.

  • Reuleaux, F. 1963. The Kinematics of Machinery. Macmillan 1876, republished by Dover: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimon, E. and Burdick, J.W. 1995. Newbounds on the number of frictionless fingers required to immobilize planar objects. J. Robotic Systems, 12(6):433–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimon, E. and Burdick, J.W. 1998a. Mobility of bodies in contact-I: A 2nd order mobility index for multiple-finger grasps. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 14(5):696–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimon, E. and Burdick, J.W. 1998b. Mobility of bodies in contact-II: How forces are generated by curvature effects. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, 14(5):709–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimon, E., Shoval, S., and Shapiro, A. 1999. Design of a quadruped robot for motion with quasistatic force constraints. Technical report, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Technion.

  • Roassmann, T. and Pfeiffer, F. 1996. Control and design of a pipe crawling robot. In 13thWorld Congress of Automatic Control, San Francisco, USA.

  • Stone, T.J., Cook, D.S., and Luk, B.L. 1995. Robug III-The design of an eight legged teleoperated walking and climbing robot for disordered hazardous environments. Mechanical Incorporated Engineer, 7(2):37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Y. and Koren, Y. 1993. Design and motion planning of a mechanical snake. IEEE Trans. on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 23(4):1091–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Sir W. and Tait, P.G. 1886. Treatise on Natural Philosophy. University of Cambridge Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Stappen, A.F., Wentink, C., and Overmars, M.H. 1999. Computing form closure configurations. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1837–1842.

  • van der Doel, K. and Pai, D.K. 1997. Performance measures for locomotion robots. J. of Robotic Systems, 14(2):135–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technion City, Haifa, 32000, Israel

    Elon Rimon & Amir Shapiro

  2. Industrial Engineering & Management, J & S Academic College, Ariel, Israel

    Shraga Shoval

Authors
  1. Elon Rimon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shraga Shoval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Shapiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rimon, E., Shoval, S. & Shapiro, A. Design of a Quadruped Robot for Motion with Quasistatic Force Constraints. Autonomous Robots 10, 279–296 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011235826269

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011235826269

Search

Navigation