This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Aleven, V. (1997). Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through a Model and Examples. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Pittsburgh.
Alexy, R. (1989). A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. and Sergot, M. J. (1988). Towards a Rule Based Representation of Open Texture in Law. In Walter, C. (ed.), Computer Power and Legal Language, Quorum Books: Westport, Connecticut, pp. 39-60.
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (1997). Argument in artificial intelligence and law, Artificial Intelligence and Law 5(4), 249-261.
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. and Coenen, F. P. (1992). Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems, Artificial Intelligence and Law 1(1), 65-86.
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. and Sartor, G. (2000). Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law. In Breuker, J., Leenes, R. and Winkels, R. (eds), Proceedings of JURIX 2000, IOS Press: Amsterdam, pp. 73-84.
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2001). Truth and consequence: complementing logic with values in legal reasoning. Information and Communications Technology Law 10(1), 2001.
de Bakker, K. F. C. and Wassink, J. G. J. (1991). Development, implementation and impact of the TESSEC expert system. In Proceedings of the European Group of Public Administration 1991.
Berman, D. H. and Hafner, C. D. (1993). Representing teleological structure in case based reasoning. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, ACM Press: New York, pp. 50-59.
Gordon, T. F. (1993). The Pleadings Game. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Hochschule, Darmstadt.
Johnson, P. and Mead, D. (1991). Legislative systems for public administration-some practical issues. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on AI and Law. ACM Press: New York, pp. 108-117.
Moles, R. N. (1992). Expert systems-the need for theory. In Proceedings of JURIX 1992. Koninklijke Vermade: Lelystad, pp. 113-122.
Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric. University of Notre Dame Press: Notre Dame.
Perelman, Ch. (1980). Justice, Law, and Argument. Reidel: Dordrecht.
Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. (1998). Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 6(2-4), 231-287.
Sergot, M. J., Sadri, F., Kowalski, R. A., Kriwaczek, F., Hammond, P, and Cory, T. (1986). The British Nationality Act as a Logic Program. Communications of the ACM 29, 5, pp. 370-386.
Stranieri, A. and Zeleznikow, J. (1999). The evaluation of legal knowledge based systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on AI and Law. ACM Press: New York, pp. 18-24.
van Noortwijk, C. and Stubbe, A. L. W. M. (1986). JURICAS: Erfrecht, een juridisch computeradviessystem. Lelystad: Vermade.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bench-Capon, T.J. George C. Christie, The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9, 59–71 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011249417505
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011249417505