Skip to main content
Log in

Designing Scientific Knowledge Infrastructures: The Contribution of Epistemology

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific knowledge is increasingly being stored in online infrastructures such as electronic journals, digital libraries and online encyclopedias. Their designers need to find an adequate approach for representing this knowledge. Unfortunately, most online infrastructures adopt the traditional article-issue-journal model which is based on print technology. This article develops an alternative model for the representation of scientific knowledge which is based on epistemology—the theory of knowledge. The characteristics of scientific knowledge identified by four philosophers of science—Popper, Nagel, Dubin and Bunge—are synthesized into a conceptual model which can be used as the foundation of scientific knowledge infrastructures in an online environment. The article shows that much more fine-grained structures are needed for representing scientific knowledge. Knowledge should not be accumulated as a collection of articles but as a network of epistemologically relevant elements such as theories, concepts, statements, facts etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong TS. Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness and Innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 1997;3:63-84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babbie ER. The Practice of Social Research. 7th edn. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Booch G, Jacobson I, Rumbaugh J. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Reading: Addison Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bunge M. Philosophy of Science (vol. 1-2). New Brunswick: Transaction Publ., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler HJ. Research into the Reward System of Scholarly Publishing. Where does Scholarly Electronic Publishing Get You? In: Okerson A, ed., Scholarly Publishing on the Electronic Networks: Filling the Pipeline and Paying the Piper (pp. 167-177). Proceedings of the 4th Symposium, Nov. 1994. Washington: Assoc. of Research Libraries, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubin R. Theory Building. New York: Free Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emory CW. Business Research Methods. Cooper Dr., 4th edn. Homewood: Irwin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fay B. Critical Social Science Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feyerabend PK. Probleme des Empirismus. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gadamer HG. Truth and Method. New York: Seabury, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guedon J-C. The seminar, the encyclopedia, and the Ecomuseum as possible future forms of electronic publishing. In: Peek RP & Newby GB, eds., Scholarly Publishing-The Electronic Frontier. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996:71-89.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison TM, Stephen T, eds. Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the Twenty-First Century. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harold ER. Extensible Markup Language. IDG, 1998.

  16. McDavid DW. Business Language Analysis for Object-Oriented Information Systems. IBM Systems Journal 1996;35(2):128-150.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edn. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Latour B. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Logoze C, Fielding D. Defining Collections in Distributed Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine. Available http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/lagoze/11lagoze.html. 1998.

  20. Menard HW. Science: Growth and Change. Cambridge: Harvard, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nagel E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Popper KR. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 3rd edn. London: Hutchinson, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scheer A-W. ARIS-Business Process Modeling. 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz C. Web Search Engines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998;49(11):973-982.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Story GA et al. The RightPages Image-Based Electronic Library for Alerting and Browsing. IEEE Computer 1992;25(9):17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Treloar A. Libraries' New Role in Electronic Scholarly Publishing. Comm. ACM 1998;41(4):88-89.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uschold M, Grüninger M. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. TR AIAI-TR-191 of the Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute, University of Edinburgh, 1996.

  28. Watson R. Creating and sustaining a global community of scholars. MISQ 1994;18(3):228-231. Available http://www.misq.org/archivist/vol/no18/issue3/vol18n3art1watson.html

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wulf W. The national collaboratory-A whitepaper. In: Lederberg J & Uncapher K, eds., Towards a National Collaboratory. Report of an invitational workshop at the Rockefeller University, Washington, D.C.; NSF, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Appendix A, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hars, A. Designing Scientific Knowledge Infrastructures: The Contribution of Epistemology. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 63–73 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011401704862

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011401704862

Navigation