Skip to main content
Log in

Neighborhood Relations between Fields with Applications to Cellular Networks

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In some spatial applications the objects of interest are fields, caused by spatially distributed sources, and one of the central questions is to find neighborhood relations between these fields. The motivating example for this paper is a cellular network: base transceiver stations transmit signals with continuous distribution, the signal strength, in an urban environment. In order to avoid interference, neighbored transceivers must not use the same frequency, so that neighborhood knowledge is one key to frequency planning. In this paper we define a concept of neighborhood for fields, and we propose a vector-based model to determine neighborhoods between given fields. In contrast to this vector-based model, the commonly used raster-based models suffer in urban areas from their resolution as well as from the prediction of signal propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Bittner, “Rough location,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geoinformation, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.G. Cohn, B. Bennett, J. Goodday, and N. Gotts. “Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning with the region connection calculus,” Geoinformatica, Vol. 1(3):1-44, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.G. Cohn and N.M. Gotts. “The ‘Egg-Yolk’ representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries,” in P.A. Burrough, A.U. Frank, (Eds.), Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. GISDATA. Vol. 2. Taylor & Francis: London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.D. Dent. Principles of Thematic Map Design. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Reading, Mass, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.J. Egenhofer. “Spatial query languages,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, 210, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.J. Egenhofer. “Reasoning about binary topological relations,” in O. Günther and H.-J. Schek, (Eds.), Advances in Spatial Databases (SSD `91). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 525, 143-160, Springer: Berlin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.J. Egenhofer and R.D. Franzosa. “Point-set topological spatial relations,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 5(2):161-174, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.U. Frank. “Qualitative spatial reasoning: Cardinal directions as an example,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 10(3):269-290, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kak. “Spatial reasoning,” AI Magazine, 9:23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Lang. “Vector-based GIS-algorithm for planning and optimizing cellular telecommunication networks,” Diploma thesis, Department of Geoinformation, Technical University of Vienna, and Department of Geography, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Molenaar. “Spatial objects without boundaries,” in W. Shi, M. Goodchild, P.F. Fisher, (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality. Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University: Hong Kong, 479-486, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Mouly, M.-B. Pautet. The GSM System for Mobile Communication. Cell & Sys, Palaiseau, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Nowok. Zellen. Course Material, DeTeMobil Training Center, Nürnberg, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Papadias, N. Karacapilidis, D. Arkoumanis. “Processing fuzzy spatial queries: A configuration similarity approach,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 13(2):93-118, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.A. Randell, Z. Cui, A.G. Cohn. “A spatial logic based on regions and connection,” in B. Nebel, W. Swarthout, C. Rich, (Eds.), Third Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann: Cambridge, 165-176, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.S. Rappaport. Wireless Communications. Principles & Practice. Prentice-Hall Company: New Jersey, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Scheinert. Begriffsdefinitionen für die Funknetzplanung. Handbuch Planung and Aufbau, 7. DeTeMobil, 1995.

  18. E. Siebe, U. Büning. “3-D-Stadtmodelle für Funknetzplanungen im Mobilfunkbereich,” Geo-Informations-Systeme, Vol. 9(4):21-29, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Turau. Algorithmische Graphentheorie. Addison-Wesley: Bonn, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. R.J. Wilson, L.W. Beineke, (Eds.), Applications of Graph Theory. Academic Press: London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Winter. “Location similarity of regions,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 55:189-200, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Worboys. “Imprecision in finite resolution spatial data,” GeoInformatica, Vol. 2(3):257-279, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lang, D., Winter, S. & Frank, A.U. Neighborhood Relations between Fields with Applications to Cellular Networks. GeoInformatica 5, 127–144 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011434114316

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011434114316

Navigation