Skip to main content
Log in

The Systems Approach to Design, and Inquiring Information Systems: Scandinavian Experiences and Proposed Research Program

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper starts with a short history of the application of dialectical social systems approach in Sweden in the sixties, and emphasizes its later application to the field of information or inquiring systems. This is followed by a reflection on the meeting between the systems approach and some other approaches mainly in Scandinavia and Europe, notably the postmodern aestheticist trends of the eighties which grew further in the nineties and now apparently dominate the stage of many computer applications in multimedia and virtual reality. The paper concludes with some reflections on the possible causes and import of these trends and possible shortcomings of the systems approach itself which make it difficult to offer the necessary resistance, requiring the future energetic work of systems researchers and educators in a proposed research program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boland RJ, Jr. The limits of language in doing systems work. In: Baskerville R, Stage J, and DeGross JI, eds. Organizational and SocialPerspectives on Information Technology. Boston: Kluwer, 2000: 47–57. (A fictional account of a roundtable with Pierre Bourdieu, West Churchman, Geoffrey Vickers, Bruno Latour, and Richard Rorty.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Checkland PB. Churchman's “Anatomy of System Teleology” Revisited. Systems Practice 1988a;1(4):377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Checkland PB. Information Systems and Systems Thinking: Time to Unite? Int. J. of Information Management 1988b;8:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Churchman CW. Why measure? In: Churchman CW. and Ratoosh P., eds. Measurement: Definitions and Theories New York: Wiley, 1959:83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Churchman CW. Prediction and Optimal Decision: Philosophical Issues of a Science of Values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Churchman CW. Challenge to Reason. New York: MacGraw-Hill, 1968a.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Churchman CW. The Systems Approach. New York: Delta, 1968b. (Page references are to the 2nd ed., 1979.)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Churchman CW. The Artificiality of Science: Review of Herbert A. Simon's Book The Sciences of the Artificial. Contemporary Psychology, 1970;15(6):385–386.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Principles of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Churchman CW. The Systems Approach and Its Enemies. New York: Basic Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Churchman CW. Churchman's Conversations. Systems Research 1984–1986;1–3(1–4).

  12. Churchman CW. Interview: The Development of the Systems Approach. Umeå: Umeå University, Dept. of Informatics (Information Processing), 1987. (Video-taped two-hours interview).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Churchman CW. Ethics and Science. Systems Research 1995;12(4):267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Churchman CW. Auerbach L, Sadan S. Thinking for Decisions: Deductive Quantitative Methods. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Churchman CW, Schainblatt AH. The Researcher and the Manager: A Dialectics of Implementation. Management Science, 1965;11(4, Feb.). B69-B87.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Courtney J, Croasdell D, Paradice D. Inquiring organizations. In: Carey JM, ed. Proc. of the AIS Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 16–18, 1996, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh, 1996:443–445.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dahlbom B. The New Informatics. Scandinavian J. of Information Systems 1996;8(2).

  18. Ehn P. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Doctoral diss. Umeå-University of Umeå, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ehn P. Manifesto for a Digital Bauhaus. Digital Creativity 1998;9(4):207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eom SB. Assessing the contributions of systems science to the development of the decision support system research subspecialties. In: Carey JM, ed. Proc. of the AIS Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 16–18, 1996, Phoenix, Arizona, USA Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh, 1996:668–670.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferry L. Homo aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age. Translated by Robert de Loaiza. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forsgren O. Samskapande datortillämpningar [Constructive Computer Applications], Doctoral diss, 1988.

  23. Fuenmayor R. Systems Thinking and World Problems. Book manuscript, personal communication in June 1997. Web site at http://www.ing.ula.ve/~sisint/, 1997.

  24. Grönlund Å. Public Computer Systems, the Client-Organization Encounter, and the Societal Dialogue. Umeå: Umeå University, Dept. of Informatics. Doctoral diss., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ivanov K. Quality-Control of Information: On the Concept of Accuracy of Information in Data Banks and in Management Information Systems: The University of Stockholm and The Royal Institute of Technology. Doctoral diss. Nat. Techn. Info. Service NTIS order No. PB-219297 from orders@ntis.fedworld.gov, 1972.

  26. Ivanov K. Computer Applications and Organizational Disease. In: Churchman CW, ed. The Well-Being of Organizations. Salinas, Calif.: Intersystems Publications, 1989, 1983:283–312.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ivanov K. Systemutveckling och rättssäkerhet. [Systems Development and Rule of Law]. Stockholm: SAF:s Förlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ivanov K. Rule of law in information systems research. In: Järvinen P, ed. Proc. of the Tenth Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Tampere-Vaskivesi, Aug. 10–12 1987. Tampere: University of Tampere, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ivanov K. Computer-Supported Human Science or Humanistic Computing Science? Steps Toward the Evaluation of a Humanistic Computing Science (UMADP-WPIPCS-41.91:3). Umeå University, Inst. of Information Processing. Revised edition of paper presented at the Tenth International Human Science Research Association Conference, August 18–22, 1991, Gothenburg. (http://www.informatik.umu.se/»kivanov/ page4.html)

  30. Ivanov K. Critical Systems Thinking and Information Technology. J. of Applied Systems Analysis 1991;18:39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ivanov K. Computer-human interaction as continuous system reconstruction. In: Ivanov K., ed. Proceedings of the 14th IRIS: Rev. Papers of the 14th Information Systems Res. Sem. in Scandinavia. Umeå-Lövånger, August 11–14 1991, 1992:85–98.

  32. Ivanov K. Hypersystems: A base for specification of computersupported self-learning social systems. In: Reigeluth CM, Banathy BH, and Olson JR, eds. Comprehensive Systems Design: A New Educational Technology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993:381–407.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ivanov K. A subsystem in the design of informatics: Recalling an archetypal engineer. In: Dahlbom B, ed. The Infological Equation: Essays in Honor of Börje Langefors Gothenburg: Gothenburg University, Dept. of Informatics, 1995:287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ivanov K. Future foundations of inquiring systems: Reformed pragmatism or spirituality? In: Carey JM, ed., Proc. of the AIS Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 16–18, 1996, Phoenix, Arizona, USA Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh, 1996:829–831.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ivanov K. Presuppositions in Information Systems Design: From Systems to Networks and Contexts? Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies 1996;5:99–114. (Also available through http://www.sciencedirect.com/).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ivanov K. Platonic information technology. Reading Plato: Cultural influences and philosophical reflection on information and technology. In: Proc. of ISTAS 2000, IEEE Int. Symposium on Technology and Society, September 6–8, 2000, Rome, Italy. New York: IEEE, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ivanov K. Pragmatist-Dialectical Systems Design and Beyond. Umeå: Umeå University, Dept. of Informatics, 2000. http://www.informatik.umu.se/~kivanov/PerspSem2000.html.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ivanov K, Ciborra CU. East and West of IS. In: Baets, WRJ, ed. Proc. of the Sixth European Conference on Information Systems ECIS'98, University of Aix-Marseille III, Aix-en-Provence, June 4–6, 1998 Vol. IV. Granada & Aix-en-Provence: Euro-Arab Management School & Institut d'Administration des, 1998:1740–1748. Enterprises IAE. (ISBN 84–923833–0–5. Extended version: cf. Ivanov, K., Strategies and design for information technology: Eastern or neo-romantic wholes, and the return toWestern systems. Umeå: Umeå University, Dept. of Informatics, 1997, also at http://www.informatik.umu.se/»kivanov/ chinese.html).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Joas H. Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1997. (cf. translated lecture on the book's issue, The Genesis of Values, http://www.tf.uio.no/etikk/artikler/entstehungderwerte. htm, May 18, 2000.)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kant I. Critique of Judgment. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 1790/1987 Translated with an introduction byWerner S. Pluhar. Foreword by Mary J. Gregor.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Klein HK, Myers MD. A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 1999;23(1):67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Leven P. Kontextuell IT-förståelse [Contextual IT-understanding] Umeå: Umeå University, Dept. of Informatics, 1997. Doctoral diss.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lindbom T. The Myth of Democracy. Gran Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1996 (Swedish orig. Demokratin är en myt. Borås: Norma, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  44. López-Garay H, Suárez T. The Holistic Sense of Prison Phenomena in Venezuela: III. The Unity of the Research. Systemic Practice and Action Research 1999;12:115–136 (1, February). (Web site at http://www.ing.ula.ve/~sisint/).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Macquarrie J. Heidegger and Christianity: The Hensley Henson Lectures 1993–94. London: SCM Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mason RO. Information systems technology and corporate strategy: Current research issues, and discussion. In: McFarlan FW, ed. The Information Systems Research Challenge Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1984:279–308.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mason RO, Mitroff II. A Program for Research on Management Information Systems. Management Science 1973;19(5, Jan.):475–487.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Midgley G. What is this thing called CST? In: Flood RL Romm, NR A, eds., Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice. New York: Plenum Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mitcham C, Grote J., eds. Theology and Technology: Essays in Christian Analysis and Exegesis, Lanham: University Press of America, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Morgenstern O. On the Accuracy of Economic Observations, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963. (1st ed. 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Norris C. What's Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ottmann H. Cognitive interests and self-reflection. In: Thompson JB and Held D, eds. Habermas: Critical Debates. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982:79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Persson S. Så tuktas en dator: En diskussionshandbok för icketekniker i ledarställning [To tame a computer]. Stockholm: Prisma, 1987 (Eds. O. Forsgren and K. Ivanov.)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Plato. Plato: The Collected Dialogues. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press-Böllingen, 1961. (Eds. Edith Hamilton & Huntington Cairns. ISBN 0–691–09718–6).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Purdy, JS. The God of the Digirati. The American Prospect 1998;37(March-April):12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Robey D, Boudreau M-C. Organizational consequences of information technology: Dealing with diversity in Empirical research. In: Zmud RW, ed. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sherry P. Spirit and Beauty: An Introduction to Theological Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stolterman E. Guidelines or Aesthetics: Design Learning Strategies. Design Studies 1994;15(October 4):448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Swanson EB. Information System Approaches: Directions for Research and Practice. Management Datamatics, 1976;5(4):155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Swanson EB. A view of information system evolution. In: Hagwood J, ed. Evolutionary Information Systems Amsterdam: North Holland, 1982:55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Swanson EB, Land FF, Targett D. Information systems as a field of study: Its place in the graduate business school. In: SELECTIONS from UCLA Graduate Management Admission Council, (Spring) 1991:7–16.

  62. Ulrich W. The metaphysics of design: A Simon-Churchman “debate”. Interfaces, 1980;10(2, April):35–40. (Reprinted in a slightly expanded version as “The metaphysics of social systems design.” In van Gigch JP, ed. Decision Making about Decision Making: Metamodels and Metasystems, Cambridge, Mass.: Abacus Press, and Kent, UK: Tunbridge Wells, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ulrich W. Systemrationalität und praktischeVernunft: Gedanken zum Stand des Systemansatzes. In: Churchman CW, ed. Der Systemansatz und seine “Feinde” Bern and Stuttgart: Haupt, (1981: 7–37). Translator's introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ulrich W. C. West Churchman-75 Years. Systems Practice, 1988;1(4):341–350. (Guest editorial to the Special Issue in honour of C. W. Churchman's 75 years).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ulrich W. Critical Heuristic of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley, 1994:(First published 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ulrich W. An Appreciation of C. West Churchman. Ponoma, Calif.: Website Luminaries of the Systems Approach of the International Society for the Systems Sciences (ISSS), http://www.isss.org/lumCWC.htm, 1999. (With an extensive bibiography from 1938 to 2000. August 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  67. van den Berg, A. Critical Theory: Is There Still Hope? American Journal of Sociology 1980;86(3):449–478.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Whitaker R. Venues for Contexture: A Critical Analysis and Enactive Reformulation of Group Decision support systems. Umeå: Umeå University, Inst. of Information Processing. (Doctoral diss).

  69. Wigley M. Whatever Happened to Total Design? Harvard Design Magazine 1998;(Summer):18–25.

  70. Xu LD. The Contribution of Systems Science to I.S. Research. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2000;17(2):105–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ivanov, K. The Systems Approach to Design, and Inquiring Information Systems: Scandinavian Experiences and Proposed Research Program. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 7–18 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011437302136

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011437302136

Navigation