Skip to main content
Log in

A Philosophy of Information Technology and Systems (IT & S) as Tools: Tool Development Context, Associated Skills and the Global Technology Transfer (GTT) Process

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is the intent of this paper to discuss a philosophy of Information Technology and Systems (IT & S) as tools and the impact of this philosophy on the Global Technical Transfer (GTT) process of IT & S.

It is argued that IT & S by definition, are artefacts, tools that have been made, used, inherited and studied within a cultural context which encompasses economic, historical, technical and social values and assumptions which are focussed in particular skill sets. It is assumed that these skill sets are mostly in evidence in any culture that receives the IT & S tool for use in a technical transfer process. It is argued, therefore, if we understand the cultural context in which a tool is made then we will understand the skills to transfer and use such tools in an effective manner. The issue we must face as makers, users, inheritors and scholars of IT & S tools, however, is that the tool context and inherent in-built values and skill sets, may not be in evidence across all cultures. This would make the effective use of IT & S, in a global sense, a difficult and complex (if not impossible) undertaking.

From this position it is argued that IT & S tools reflect the IT & S discipline, as it is these tools which embody the assumptions of the discipline and hence, its paradigm. The Bunker and Dean (Bunker DJ, Dean RG. Philosophical Traditions in Information Systems: Challenger of an Interdisciplinary View, Faculty of Commerce Workshop, University of Wollongong, July 10--11, 1997) disciplinary model is highlighted as a means of understanding how tools are made within a cultural context and how they reflect the discipline in which they are created. This paper then goes on to explain the ramifications of IT & S as a discipline on the GTT process and proposes a skill-focussed approach, within a culture, to determining what IT & S may be appropriate for that particular cultural context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose PJ, Johnson GJ. A trust based model of buying behaviour in electronic retailing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Association of Information Systems Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, August 14–16, 1998.

  • Ayres, C.E. The Theory of Economic Progress. Kalamazoo, Michigan: New Issues Press,Western Michigan University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R. Structural entropy model of technology transfer. In: Kautz K, Pries-Heje J, Larsen T, and Sorgaard P, eds. Proceedings of the First IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology. Leangkollen, Oslo, Norway, October 14–17, 1995. Conference notebook.

  • Bauer M. Towards a functional analysis of resistance. In: Bauer M, ed. Resistance to New Technology. Cambridge University Press, 1995, New York.

  • Bronowski J. The Ascent of Man. British Broadcasting Commission, 1973, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski J. A Sense of the Future. MIT Press, 1977, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker DJ, Dean RG. Towards an information systems paradigmatic framework, association for information systems. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, August 16–18, 1996, 596–598.

  • Bunker DJ, Dean RG. Information systems as tools: Towards an information systems paradigmatic framework. Philosophical Traditions in Information Systems: Challenges of an Interdisciplinary View, Faculty of Commerce Workshop, University of Wollongong, July 10–11, 1997.

  • Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell D. The Fontana History of Technology. Fontana Press, 1994, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, 1990, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collot M, Belmore N. Electronic language: A new variety of English. In: Herring SC, ed. Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamins, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLisi PS. Lessons from the steel axe: Culture, technology and organisational change. Sloan Management Review 1990; Fall.

  • Denny C. In cyberspace, no-one can hear you if you're not connected. Sydney Morning Herald Good Weekend Magazine 1999; Sept.

  • Elliot L. A new world disorder. SydneyMorning Herald GoodWeekend Magazine, 1999; Sept.

  • Friedman B, Nissenbaum H. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 1996;14(3):330–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers R. Some personal reflections on issues facing the information systems research community. TC8AUS IFIP Information Systems International Working Conference, Gold Coast Queensland, Australia, May 8–11, 1994.

  • Handy C. Understanding Organisations. Penguin, 1993, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headrick DR. The Tools of Empire. Oxford University Press, 1981, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath J. Cultural attitudes and technology. In: Ess C and Sudweeks F, eds. Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology '98. University of Sydney, Australia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbig PA. The Innovation Matrix: Culture and Structure Prerequisites to Innovation. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Sage Publications, 1980, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. Attitudes, values and organisational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organisation Studies 1998;19(3):477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongladarom S. Global culture, local cultures, and the internet. In: Ess C and Sudweeks F, eds. Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology '98. University of Sydney, Australia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DG. Is the global information technology infrastructure a democratic technology? Computers and Society 1997; Sept.

  • Kanellis P, Paul RJ. Will information systems continue to disappoint? In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Phoenix, Arizona USA, August 16–18, 1996.

  • Kautz K, Pries-Heje J, Larsen T, Sorgaard P, eds. Proceedings of the First IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology. Leangkollen, Oslo, Norway, October 14–17, 1995. Conference notebook.

  • Kluckhohn FR, Strodtbech FL. Variations in Value Orientations. Evaston, Il: Row Peterson, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed. The University of Chicago Press, 1970, Chicago, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TJ, Levine L. Information technology at the turn of the millenium: Past, present and future trends. In Lasen T, Leone L, and De Cross, eds. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 and 8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes. Helsinki, Finland, 10–13 December, 1998.

  • Larsen TJ, Levine L, DeGross, eds. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 and 8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems: Current Issues and Future Changes. Helsinki, Finland, 10–13 December, 1998.

  • Lien L. Transferring technologies from developed to developing industrial and commercial environments. In: Levine L, ed. IFIP Transactions Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technologies, Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 11–13 October, 1993.

  • Levine L, ed. IFIP Transactions Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technologies Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology. Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 11–13 October, 1993.

  • Lycett M, Kanellis P, Paul RJ. Philosophical directions for information systems development. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Minneapolis, USA, August 23–27, 1997, 295–299.

  • Maitland K. Global diffusion of interactive networks—The impact of culture. In: Ess C and Sudweeks F, eds. Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology '98. University of Sydney, Australia, 1998:268–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus L. Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. In: Fulk J and Steinfield C, eds. Organisations and Communications Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 34–51, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterman M. The nature of a paradigm. In: Lakatos I and Musgrave A, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. London, 1965, Volume 4, 1970.

  • Morieux YVH, Sutherland E. The interaction between the use of information technology and organisational culture. Behaviour and Information Technology 1988;7(2):34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley KP. Man the Tool-Maker, 6th ed. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley KP. Tools Makyth Man, Antiquity Volume 31, 1957.

  • Pargman D. Reflections on cultural bias and adaptation. In: Ess C and Sudweeks F, eds. Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology '98, University of Sydney, Australia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porra J. Colonial systems. Information Systems Research 1999; 10(1):38–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resman A, Zhao L. Journal of Technology Transfer 1991; Spring.

  • Rey L. Attitudes towards technology and communication across the multiple cultures of Switzerland. In: Ess C and Sudweeks F, eds. Proceedings of Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology '98. University of Sydney, Australia, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R. The International Transfer of Technology: Issues, Theory and Practice. Ballinger Publishing Company (Harper and Row, Publishers Inc., Cambridge), 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenburg N, Frischtak C. International Technology Transfer: Concepts Measures and Comparisons. New York: Praeger Publishers (CBS Educational and Professional Publishing), 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein Edgar H. Coming to a new awareness of organisational culture. Sloan Management Review 1984; Winter.

  • Straub DW. The effect of culture on IT diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S. Information Systems Research 1994;5(1): 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group.Water Supply and Sanitation [Online]. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/water/, [2000, July 18].

  • Whirled Bank Group. Dams and theWorld Bank [Online]. Available at http://www.whirledbank.org/environment/dams.html, [2000, July 18].

  • Young JZ. An Introduction to the Study of Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunker, D. A Philosophy of Information Technology and Systems (IT & S) as Tools: Tool Development Context, Associated Skills and the Global Technology Transfer (GTT) Process. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 185–197 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011443406476

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011443406476

Navigation