Abstract
Collaborative learning involves students working in small groups to complete tasks related to class instruction. Collaborative learning techniques are widely used in business schools. There is research evidence to suggest that collaborative learning leads to positive outcomes. Specifically, the interaction that occurs among students in completing the group task provides both educational and social benefits. The easy availability of communication technology has changed the modality of interaction among students. This change has been furthered by an increase in the number of students who work full-time and also enroll in business schools. Such students tend to interact more using communication technologies, such as electronic mail and not necessarily face-to-face. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of these changes in communication modalities on the outcomes of group work. The results indicate that while students have a preference for using traditional face-to-face interaction, there seems to be no significant correlation between communication modality and measures of group outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P.C. Abrami, B. Chamber, M.F. D'Apollonia and C. DeSimone, Group outcome: The relationship between group learning outcome, attributional style, academic achievement, and self-concept, Contemporary Educational Psychology 17 (1992) 1–9.
S.M. Acker, Space, collaboration and the credible city: Academic work in the virtual university, The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1 (1996) 3–9.
M. Alavi, Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation, MIS Quarterly 18 (1994) 159–174.
M. Alavi, B.C.Wheeler and J.S. Valacich, Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning, MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 293–312.
B. Chambers and P.C. Abrami, The relationship between student team learning outcomes and achievement, casual attributions, and affect, Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (1991) 140–146.
B.P. Cohen and E.G. Cohen, From groupwork among children to R&D teams: Interdependence, interaction and productivity, in: Advances in Group Processes, eds. E.J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway and H.A. Walker (JaiPress, Greenwich, 1991) pp. 205–226.
E.G. Cohen, Talking and working together: Status interaction and learning, in: Instructional Groups in the Classroom: Organization and Process, eds. Peterson, L.C. Wilkinson and M. Hallinan (Academic Press, Orlando, 1984) pp. 171–188.
E.G. Cohen, Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups, Review of Educational Research 64 (1994) 1–35.
E.G. Cohen, R. Lotan and C. Leechor, Can classrooms learn?, Sociology of Education 62 (1989) 75–94.
M.M. El-Shinnaway and M.L. Markus, Media richness theory and new electronic communication medium: A study of voice mail and electronic mail, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Systems (1992) pp. 91–106.
N.J. Evans and P.A. Jarvis, The group attitude scale: A measure of attraction to group, Small Group Behavior 17 (1986) 203–216.
J. Galegher and R.E. Kraut, Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment on group writing, Information Systems Research 5 (1994) 110–138.
J.F. George, G.K. Easton, K. Nunamaker Jr. and G.B. NorthCraft, A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support, Information Systems Research 1 (1990) 394–415.
S.G. Green and T.D. Taber, The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25 (1980) 97–106.
S.R. Hiltz and K. Johnson, User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems, Management Science 36 (1990) 739–764.
D. Johnson and R. Johnson, Classroom conflict: Controversy versus debate in learning groups, American Educational Research Journal 22 (1985) 237–256.
D. Johnson and R. Johnson, Cooperative learning and achievement, in: Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research, ed. S. Sharan (Praeger, New York, 1990) pp. 23–37.
D. Johnson, R. Johnson and M. Stanne, Impact of goal and resource interdependence on problemsolving success, Journal of Social Psychology 129 (1990) 507–516.
D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone (Prentice Hall, 1975).
D.W. Johnson, R.T. Johnson and G. Maruyama, Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research, Review of Educational Research 53 (1983) 5–54.
J. King, The well rounded student, ComputerWorld 10 (1997) 11–13.
A. Laplante, Lighten up, ComputerWorld 10 (1997) 13–19.
D.E. Leidner and M.A. Fuller, Improving student processing and assimilation of conceptual information: GDSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning, Decision Support Systems 20 (1995) 149–163.
D.E. Leidner and S.L. Jarvenpaa, The information age confronts education: Case studies on electronic classrooms, Information Systems Research 4 (1993) 24–54.
D.E. Leidner and S.L. Jarvenpaa, The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view, MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 265–291.
J.E. McGrath, Time matters in groups, in: Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Basis of Collaborative Work, eds. J. Galeghar, R.E. Kraut and C. Egido (Erlbaum, 1990) pp. 23–61.
J.E. McGrath, Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) a theory of groups, Small Group Research 22 (1991) 147–174.
N. Noddings, Theoretical and practical concerns about small groups in mathematics, Elementary School Journal 89 (1989) 607–623.
P.A. Okebukola, The relative effectiveness of cooperative and competitive interaction techniques in strengthening students' performance in science classes, Science Education 69 (1985) 501–509.
M.S. Poole and G. DeSanctis, Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration, in: Theoretical Approaches to Information Technologies in Organizations, eds. C. Steinfield and J. Fulk (Sage, 1989).
J. Ross and D. Raphael, Communication and problem solving achievement in cooperative learning groups, Journal of Curriculum Studies 22 (1990) 149–164.
S. Sharan, Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitude and ethnic relations, Review of Education Research 50 (1980) 241–271.
R.E. Slavin, Cooperative learning, Review of Education Research 50 (1980) 315–342.
R.E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning (Longman, 1983).
R.E. Slavin, When does cooperative learning increase student achievement, American Psychological Association 94 (1983) 429–445.
R.E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice (Prentice Hall, 1990).
L. Sproull and S. Kiesler, Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (MIT Press, 1991).
N.Webb, Peer interaction and learning in small groups, International Journal of Educational Research 13 (1989) 21–39.
N.M. Webb, Predicting learning from student interaction: Defining the interaction variables, Educational Psychologist 18 (1983) 33–41.
N.M. Webb, P. Ender and S. Lewis, Problem solving strategies and group processes in small group learning computer, American Educational Research Journal 23 (1986) 243–261.
M.H. Zack, Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups, Information Systems Research 4 (1993) 207–239.
R. Zmud, M. Lind and F. Young, An attribute space for organizational communication channels, Information Systems Research 1 (1990) 440–457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santhanam, R. The Effects of Communication Modality on Outcomes of Collaborative Tasks. Information Technology and Management 2, 377–394 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011498500959
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011498500959