Skip to main content
Log in

Bargaining on an Internet Agent-based Market: Behavioral vs. Optimizing Agents

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze an Internet agent-based market where non-cooperative agents using behavioral rules negotiate the price of a given product in a bilateral and sequential manner. In this setting, we study the optimal decision-making process of a buying agent that enters the market. Our approach is based on Negotiation Analysis (Raiffa, 1982; Sebenuis, 1992) and we consider that the optimizing buying agent maximizes her discounted expected utility using subjective probabilities. The optimal decision-making process of the buying agent is treated as a stochastic control problem that can be solved by dynamic programming. Three types of behavioral agents are studied, namely conceder agents, boulware agents and imitative agents. A set of simulations is undertaken in order to predict the average outcome in a negotiation process for different parameters of the optimizing buying agent and for the three possible selling agents' behaviors. Finally, we compare the performance of the optimizing agent with that of behavioral buying agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt, J. (1979). “Toward a Concept of Domesticated Markets.” Journal of Marketing 43(3), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellman, R.E. (1957). Dynamic Programming. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beam, C. and A. Segev. (1996). “Electronic Catalogs and Negotiations.” CITM Working Paper 96-WP-1016, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. and N. Vulkan. (1999). “Applying Game Theory to Automated Negotiation.” Netnomics 1(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, A. and P. Maes. (1996). “Kasbah: An Agent Marketplace for Buying and Selling Goods.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology. London.

  • Cramton, P.C. (1991). “Dynamic Bargaining with Transaction Costs.” Management Science 37, 1221–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P.C. (1992). “Strategic Delay in Bargaining with Two-sided Uncertainty.” The Review of Economic Studies 59, 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J.G. (1965). “A Theory of Bargaining Process.” American Economic Review 55, 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, F.B. (1963). “Selling as a Dyadic Relationship-A New Approach.” American Behavioral Scientist 6, 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faratin, P., C. Sierra and N.R. Jennings. (1998). “Negotiation Decision Functions for Autonomous Agents.” Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3–4), 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. and W. Ury. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiation Agreement Without Giving In. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogelman-Soulié, F., B. Munier and M.F. Shakun. (1983). “Bivariate Negotiations as a Problem of Stochastic Terminal Control.” Management Science 29(7), 840–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, R., A. Moukas and P. Maes. (1998). “Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: A Survey.” Knowledge Engineering Review 13(2), 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, N.R. and M.J. Wooldridge, eds. (1998). Agent Technology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadane, J.B. and P.D. Larkey. (1982). “Subjective Probability and the Theory of Game.” Management Science 28(2), 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. and J.Wilkenfield. (1991). “Negotiations over Time in a Multiagent Environment: Preliminary Report.” In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Sydney.

  • Kraus, S. (1997). “Negotiation and Cooperation in Multi-agent Environments.” Artificial Intelligence 94(1–2), 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. (1997). “Beliefs, Time and Incomplete Information in Multiple Encounter Negotiations among Autonomous Agents.” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 20(1–4), 111–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leloup, B. and L. Deveaux. (2001). “Dynamic Pricing on the Internet: Theory and Simulations.” Electronic Commerce Research Journal 1(3), 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T.-P. and H.-S. Doong. (2000). “Effect of Bargaining in Electronic Commerce.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce 4(3), 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matos, N., C. Sierra and N.R. Jennings. (1998). “Determining Successful Negotiation Strategies: An Evolutionary Approach.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-agent Systems. Paris.

  • Nash, J.F. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, S. and M.J. Wooldridge. (2001). “Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents.” Forthcoming in The Knowledge Engineering Review.

  • Pruitt, D.G. (1981). Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and The Science of Negotiation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A.G. and M.F. Shakun. (1974). “A Normative Model of Negotiation.” Management Science 20(10), 1364–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., I. Evev and R. Zwick. (1995). “An experimental Study of Buyer-seller Negotiation with One-sided Incomplete Information and Time Discounting.” Management Science 41(3), 377–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenschein, J.S. and G. Zlotkin. (1994). Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm, T. and V. Lesser. (1995). “Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Protocol.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems. San Francisco.

  • Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenuis, J.K. (1992). “Negotiation Analysis: A Characterization and Review.” Management Science 38(1), 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulkan, N. (1999). “Economic Implications of Agent Technology and E-commerce.” The Economic Journal 109, F67-F90.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, P.M., D. Ariely, E. Bellman, J. Huber, E. Johnson, B. Kahn, J. Little and D. Schkade. (1999). “Agent to the Rescue?” Marketing Letters 10(3), 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, D. and K. Sycara. (1998). “Bayesian Learning in Negotiation.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48, 125–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deveaux, L., Paraschiv, C. & Latourrette, M. Bargaining on an Internet Agent-based Market: Behavioral vs. Optimizing Agents. Electronic Commerce Research 1, 371–401 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011561502913

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011561502913

Navigation