Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons from the study of scholarly communication for the new information era

  • Other Index
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rich body of literature examining communications flow in the research context, an area where Professor Belver Griffith made major contributions, has very direct relevance to the relatively newly emerging recognition in the business community of the importance of knowledge creation and deployment to the competitive performance of an organization. This essay examines and delineates some of those lessons, specifically the tension between open and rich communications versus the need to protect intellectual property; the importance of environmental awareness and serendipity, and achieving the correct balance with efficient use of information searching time; the importance of end-user training; and crafting the balance in knowledge management between codifications and personalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allen, T. J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 320p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1971), Scientific communication — Its role in the conduct of research and the creation of knowledge, American Psychologist, 26: 349-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1972), Communication and information processing disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology, Information Storage and Retrieval, 8: 123-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginman, M. (1988), Information culture and business performance, IATUL Quarterly, 2(2): 93-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhar, J. D., Bragaw, L. K., Schwartz, J. J. (1976), Information flows, management styles, and technological innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 23 (1): 51-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. C., Miller, J. A. (1970), Networks of information communication among scientifically productive scientists, In: Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, Nelson, C., Pollock, D.(Eds), Lexington, Mass. Health Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, J.-M. (1982), The value of information and related systems, products and services,. In: Williams, M. E., (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 17. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publication, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science; pp. 269-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. Tierney, T. (1999), What's your strategy for managing knowledge, Harvard Business Review, 77(2): 106-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. W., McDonald, D. D., Roderer, N. K. (1981), Scientific Journals in the United States: Their Production, Use, and Economics, Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (1982), Determinants of expert judgement of research performance, Scientometrics, 4(5): 361-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (1983a), bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(2): 136-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (1983b), Bibliometric analysis of pharmaceutical research, Research Policy, 12(1): 15-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (1990), Information services and downstream productivity, In: Williams, M. E. (Ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 25. New York, Elsevier Science Publishers for the American Society for Information Science, pp. 55-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (1992), The information environment and the productivity of research, In: Recent Advances in Chemical Information, H. Collier (Ed.) London, Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 133-143. Reprinted in GRIMSHAW A. (Ed.) Information Culture and Business Performance (Information Strategy Report 2, prepared for the British Library by Hertis Information and Research); Hatfield, Herfordshire, U.K. University of Hertfordshire Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (2000), Why serendipity is the key to innovation, Knowledge Management Review, 3(2): 11-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondschein, L. G. (1990), SDI use and productivity in the corporate research environment, Special Libraries, 81(4): 265-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelke, M. (1999a), Knowledge management in Swedish corporations, In: Srikantaiah, T., Koenig M. E. D. (Eds), Knowledge Management for the Information Professional, Medford, N.J., Information Today for the American Society for Information Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelke, M. (1999b), The role of the corporate library in the knowledge management process, Information Services and Use, 19(1): 49-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orpen, C. (1985), The effect of managerial distribution or scientific and technical information on company performance, R&D Management, 15(4): 305-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., Waterman, R. (1982), In Search of Excellence, New York, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppel, H. L. (1982), Who needs the office of the future? Harvard Business Review, 60(6): 146-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderer, N. K., King, D. W., Brouard, S. E. (1983), The Use and Value of Defense Technical Information Center Products and Services, Rockville, MD: King Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, P. A. (1994), Skills and employment opportunities in the information age, Lazerow Lecture delivered at Dominican University (then Rosary College), River Forest, Illinois.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koenig, M.E.D. Lessons from the study of scholarly communication for the new information era. Scientometrics 50, 511–523 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012726323178

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012726323178

Navigation