Abstract
The rich body of literature examining communications flow in the research context, an area where Professor Belver Griffith made major contributions, has very direct relevance to the relatively newly emerging recognition in the business community of the importance of knowledge creation and deployment to the competitive performance of an organization. This essay examines and delineates some of those lessons, specifically the tension between open and rich communications versus the need to protect intellectual property; the importance of environmental awareness and serendipity, and achieving the correct balance with efficient use of information searching time; the importance of end-user training; and crafting the balance in knowledge management between codifications and personalization.
References
Allen, T. J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 320p.
Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1971), Scientific communication — Its role in the conduct of research and the creation of knowledge, American Psychologist, 26: 349-362.
Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1972), Communication and information processing disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology, Information Storage and Retrieval, 8: 123-126.
Ginman, M. (1988), Information culture and business performance, IATUL Quarterly, 2(2): 93-106.
Goldhar, J. D., Bragaw, L. K., Schwartz, J. J. (1976), Information flows, management styles, and technological innovation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 23 (1): 51-61.
Griffith, B. C., Miller, J. A. (1970), Networks of information communication among scientifically productive scientists, In: Communication Among Scientists and Engineers, Nelson, C., Pollock, D.(Eds), Lexington, Mass. Health Lexington Books.
Griffiths, J.-M. (1982), The value of information and related systems, products and services,. In: Williams, M. E., (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 17. White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publication, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science; pp. 269-284.
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. Tierney, T. (1999), What's your strategy for managing knowledge, Harvard Business Review, 77(2): 106-116.
King, D. W., McDonald, D. D., Roderer, N. K. (1981), Scientific Journals in the United States: Their Production, Use, and Economics, Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co.
Koenig, M. E. D. (1982), Determinants of expert judgement of research performance, Scientometrics, 4(5): 361-378.
Koenig, M. E. D. (1983a), bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(2): 136-145.
Koenig, M. E. D. (1983b), Bibliometric analysis of pharmaceutical research, Research Policy, 12(1): 15-36.
Koenig, M. E. D. (1990), Information services and downstream productivity, In: Williams, M. E. (Ed.) Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 25. New York, Elsevier Science Publishers for the American Society for Information Science, pp. 55-86.
Koenig, M. E. D. (1992), The information environment and the productivity of research, In: Recent Advances in Chemical Information, H. Collier (Ed.) London, Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 133-143. Reprinted in GRIMSHAW A. (Ed.) Information Culture and Business Performance (Information Strategy Report 2, prepared for the British Library by Hertis Information and Research); Hatfield, Herfordshire, U.K. University of Hertfordshire Press, 1995.
Koenig, M. E. D. (2000), Why serendipity is the key to innovation, Knowledge Management Review, 3(2): 11-12.
Mondschein, L. G. (1990), SDI use and productivity in the corporate research environment, Special Libraries, 81(4): 265-279.
Nelke, M. (1999a), Knowledge management in Swedish corporations, In: Srikantaiah, T., Koenig M. E. D. (Eds), Knowledge Management for the Information Professional, Medford, N.J., Information Today for the American Society for Information Science.
Nelke, M. (1999b), The role of the corporate library in the knowledge management process, Information Services and Use, 19(1): 49-54.
Orpen, C. (1985), The effect of managerial distribution or scientific and technical information on company performance, R&D Management, 15(4): 305-308.
Peters, T. J., Waterman, R. (1982), In Search of Excellence, New York, Harper & Row.
Poppel, H. L. (1982), Who needs the office of the future? Harvard Business Review, 60(6): 146-155.
Roderer, N. K., King, D. W., Brouard, S. E. (1983), The Use and Value of Defense Technical Information Center Products and Services, Rockville, MD: King Research, Inc.
Strassmann, P. A. (1994), Skills and employment opportunities in the information age, Lazerow Lecture delivered at Dominican University (then Rosary College), River Forest, Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koenig, M.E.D. Lessons from the study of scholarly communication for the new information era. Scientometrics 50, 511–523 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012726323178
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012726323178