Skip to main content
Log in

Sociology and Social Theory in Agent Based Social Simulation: A Symposium

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A lengthy and intensive debate about the role of sociology in agent based social simulation dominated the email list simsoc@jiscmail.ac.uk during the autumn of 2000. The debate turned on the importance of models being devised to capture the properties of whole social systems and whether those properties should determine agent behaviour or, conversely, whether the properties of social systems should emerge from the behaviour and interaction of the agents and, if so, how that emergence should be represented. The positions of four of the main protagonists concerned specifically with the modelling issues are reprised and extended in this symposium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asch, S.E. (1956), “Studies of Independence and Conformity: A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority, ” Psychological Monograph, 70(9), 416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckermann, A., F. Hans and K. Jaegwon (Eds.) (1992), “Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. ” de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. and L. Gasser (1999), “Computational Organization Theory. ” in G. Weiss (Ed.) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 299–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi C. and R. Falcone (1998), “Social Trust: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance, Quantification and Dynamics. ” in Autonomous Agents' 98 Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societes. May 9, Minneapolis/St Paul, USA.

  • Castelfranchi C. and R. Falcone (2000), “Trust and Control: A Dialectic Link, ” Applied Artificial Intelligence Special Issue on “Trust in Agents” Part1, C. Castelfranchi, R. Falcone, B. Firozabadi and Y. Tan (Eds.), Taylor and Francis 14(8), 799–823.

  • Conte, R. and C. Castelfranchi (1996), “Simulating Multi-Agent Interdependencies. A Two-Way Approach to the Micro-Macro Link” in U. Mueller and K. Troitzsch (Eds.) Microsimulation and the Social Sciences, Springer, Berlin pp. 394–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R. and M. Paolucci (2001), “Intelligent Social Learning, ” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(1). (http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/1/3.html).

  • Conte, R., C. Castelfranchi and V. Veneziano (1998), “The Computer Simulation of Partnership Formation, ” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 4(4), 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T.E., S. Moss and C. Pahl-Wostl (2000), “Understanding Climate Policy Using Participatory Agent Based Social Simulation”, in S. Moss and P. Davidsson (2000), pp. 198–213.

  • Edmonds, B. (1999), “Pragmatic Holism, ” Foundations of Science, 4, 57–82. An earlier version is available at (http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk~bruce/praghol/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, B. (2000a), “The Use of Models—Making MABS Actually Work, ” in S. Moss and P. Davidsson (Eds.) Multi Agent Based Simulation, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1979, 15–32. (http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep74.html).

  • Edmonds, B. (2000b), “The Purpose and Place of Formal Systems in the Development of Science, ” CPM Report No.00-75, (http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep75.html).

  • Gilbert, N. (1995), “Emergence in Social Simulation” in N. Gilbert and R. Conte (Eds.) Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life. UCL Press, London, pp. 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A.von (1942), “Scientism and the Study of Society, Part I. ” Economica 9, 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk, C.K. (2000), “Sexual Attraction and Inter-sexual Dominance among Virtual Agents, ” in S. Moss and P. Davidsson (Eds.) Multi Agent Based Simulation, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1979, pp. 167–180.

  • Humphreys, P., F. Rohrlich, A. Rosenberg and W.C. Wimsatt (1996), “Symposium: Emergence and Supervenience: Alternatives to Unity by Reduction, ” Philosophy of Science, 64, S337–S384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. and M. Sergot (1996), “A Formal Characterization of Institutionalized Power, ” Journal of the IGPL, 4(3), 429–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogh K. (1996), “The Rights of Agents” in M. Wooldridge, J. Müller and M. Tambe (Eds.) Intelligent Agents II—Proceedings of the 1995 Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL-95), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B. and J.M. Darley (1970), The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't It Help? Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, P.K. (1999), “Reduction and Emergence” Special Issue of Philosophical Studies, 95, (1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. (1883, 1963), Problems of Economics and Sociology. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL. (Originally published in 1883 as Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondere.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. and C. Castelfranchi (2000), “The Role of Evaluation in Cognition and Social Interaction, ” in K. Dautenhahn (Ed.) Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 225–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. (1998), “Critical Incident Management: An Empirically Derived Computational Model, ” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(4). (http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/4/1.html).

  • Moss, S. and P. Davidsson (Eds.) (2000), “Multi Agent Based Simulation, ” in Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-verlage, 1979.

  • O'sullivan, D. and Mordechai Haklay (2000), “Agent-Based Models and Individualism: Is the World Agent-Based?” Environment and Planning A, 32, 1409–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. and L. Jacobson (1968), Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Student Intellectual Development. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouchier J., F. Bousquet, M. Requier-Desjardins and M. Antona (2001), “A Multi-Agent Model for Describing Transhumance in North Cameroon: Comparison of Different Rationality to Develop a Routine, ” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25, 527–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R.K. (2000), “Simulating Emergence and Downward Causation in Small Groups” in S. Moss and P. Davidsson (2000), pp. 49–67.

  • Sawyer, R.K. (2000a), “Emergence in Psychology: A History of Anti-Reductionist Arguments in Psychology” Unpublished manuscript under review.

  • Sawyer, R.K. (2000b), “Nonreductive Individualism, Part 1. Supervenience and wild disjunction. ” Unpublished manuscript under review.

  • Sawyer, R. Keith. (2000c), “Nonreductive Individualism, Part 2. Social causation. ” Unpublished manuscript under review.

  • Sawyer, R. Keith. (2001a), “Artificial Societies: Multi Agent Systems and the Micro-Macro Link in Sociological Theory. ” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Sawyer, R.K. (2001b), “Emergence in Sociology. ” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Schillo, M., K. Fischer and C.T. Klein (2000), “The Micro-Macro Link in DAI and Sociology” in S. Moss and P. Davidsson, (2000), pp. 133–148.

  • Schillo, M., K. Fischer, S. Allen and C.T. Klein (2000), “Socially Competent Business Agents with Attitude—Using Habitus Field theory to Design Agents with Social Competence, ” in “Starting from Society” symposium, ASIB&, Birmingham, April 2000. (http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/cpmrep68.html).

  • Sherif, M. (1936), The Psychology of Social Norms. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1986), “The Failure of Armchair Economics, ” Challenge, 29(5), 18–25 (Interview).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., E.D. Tanke and E. Berscheid (1977), “Social Perception and Interpersonal Behaviour: On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J.W.N. (1973), “Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences, ” in J. O'Neill (Ed.) Modes of Individualism and Collectivism. Gregg Revivals, Hampshire, UK, pp. 166–178. (Originally published in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 8, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B., A. Heingartner and E.M. Herman (1969), “Social Enhancement and Impairment of Performance in the Cockroach, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conte, R., Edmonds, B., Moss, S. et al. Sociology and Social Theory in Agent Based Social Simulation: A Symposium. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 7, 183–205 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012919018402

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012919018402

Navigation