Skip to main content
Log in

Monads on Composition Graphs

  • Published:
Applied Categorical Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collections of objects and morphisms that fail to form categories, inasmuch as the expected composites of two morphisms need not always be defined, were introduced in [14,15] under the name composition graphs. In [14,16], notions of adjunction and weak adjunction for composition graphs are proposed. Building on these definitions, we now introduce a concept of monads for composition graphs and show that the usual correspondence between adjunctions and monads remains correct, i.e. that (weak) adjunctions give rise to monads and that all monads are induced by adjunctions. Monads are described in terms of natural transforms as well as in terms of Kleisli triples, which seem to be better suited in the absence of associativity. The realization of a monad by an adjunction relies on a generalization of the Kleisli construction to composition graphs; on the other hand, the Eilenberg–Moore construction produces only a weak adjunction and admits comparison functors from weak adjunctions. As a first nontrivial example, we determine the algebras of the word monad on the composition graph of full morphisms between sets with a distinguished subset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamek, J., Herrlich, H., and Strecker, G. E.: Abstract and Concrete Categories, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coppey, L.: Décompositions directes des précategories, Math. Arbeitspapiere der Universität Bremen 7 (1976), 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Coppey, L.: Quelques problèmes typiques concernant les graphes multiplicatifs, Diagrammes 3 (1980), C1–C46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehresmann, C.: Catégories et Structures, Dunod, Paris, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eilenberg, S. and Moore, J. C.: Adjoint functors and triples, Illinois J.Math. 9 (1965), 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graetzer, G.: Universal Algebra, 2nd edn, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herrlich, H. and Strecker, G. E.: Category Theory, Heldermann, Berlin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kleisli, H.: Every standard construction is induced by a pair of adjoint functors, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (1065), 544–546.

  9. Knauer, U. and Böttcher, M.: Endomorphism spectra of graphs, Discrete Math. 109 (1992), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician, Springer, Berlin, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manes, E. G.: Algebraic Theories, Springer, Berlin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mateus, P., Sernadas, A., and Sernadas, C.: Precategories for combining probabilistic automata, Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci.29 (1999).

  13. Moggi, E.: Notions of computation and monads, Inform. and Comput. 93 (1991), 55–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schröder, L.: Composition graphs (in German), PhD Thesis, University of Bremen, 1999; also: Logos, Berlin, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schröder, L. and Herrlich, H.: Free adjunction of morphisms, Appl. Cat. Struct. 8 (2000), 595–606.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schröder, L. and Mateus, P.: Universal aspects of probabilistic automata, Submitted for publication.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schröder, L. Monads on Composition Graphs. Applied Categorical Structures 10, 221–236 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015200105427

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015200105427

Navigation