Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity Requirements for Node and Arc Survivable Networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider a route in a rectilinear grid communications network and compute the ratio of the additional capacity per tandem node required to make the route immune to a single tandem node failure (which causes all arcs incident to the node to fail), divided by the additional capacity per arc required to make the route immune to a single arc failure. For any route satisfying a mild assumption, we prove the ratio is between 1 and 4/3. For random routes, we show that the expected value of the ratio is 10/9 for routes using 2 arcs, 202/189 for routes using 3 arcs, and has the limit (as the number of arcs increases to infinity) of 7/6. The theoretical results are in close agreement with empirical results, using a network design algorithm, for large data communications networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Balakrishnan, T.L. Magnanti and P. Mirchandani, Designing hierarchical survivable networks, Operations Research 46(1) (1998) 116-136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Bhandari, Survivable Networks: Algorithms for Diverse Routing (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F.T. Boesch, Synthesis of reliable networks - A survey, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 35(3) (1986) 240-246.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.H. Cardwell, C.L. Monma and T.-H. Wu, Computer-aided design procedures for survivable fiber optic networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 7(8) (1989) 1188-1197.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.R.K. Chung, Spectral Graph Theory, Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Vol. 92 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.R.K. Chung, V. Faber and T.A. Manteuffel, An upper bound on the diameter of a graph from eigen-values associated with its Laplacian, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 7(3) (1994) 443-457.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Çinlar, Introduction to Stochastic Processes (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L.W. Clarke and G. Anandalingam, Optimal design of survivable LAN-LAN networks, in: IEEE Internat. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (1990) pp. 293-297.

  9. D.M. Cvetkovic, M. Doob and H. Sachs, Spectra of Graphs (Academic Press, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Dahl, The design of survivable directed networks, Telecommunication Systems 2(4) (1994) 349-377.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Davis, D. Orvosh, A. Cox and Y. Qiu, A genetic algorithm for survivable network design, in: Proc. of the 5th Internat. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms (Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1993) pp. 408-415.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. De Jongh, M. Gendreau and M. Labbé, Finding disjoint routes in telecommunications networks with two technologies, Operations Research 47(1) (1999) 81-92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Frank and I. Frisch, Communication, Transmission, and Transportation Networks (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Grotschel, C.L. Monma and M. Stoer, Computational results with a cutting plane algorithm for designing communications networks with low-connectivity constraints, Operations Research 40(2) (1992) 309-330.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Grotschel, C.L. Monma and M. Stoer, Design of survivable networks, in: Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science: Networks (Bellcore, Morristown, NJ, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Kajitani and S. Ueno, The minimum augmentation of a directed tree to a k-edge-connected directed graph, Networks 16 (1986) 181-197.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Koch, Private communication (1997).

  18. D. Medhi, A unified framework for survivable telecommunications network design, in: SUPER-COMM/ Internat. Conf. on Communications (1992) pp. 411-415.

  19. B. Mohar, Eigenvalues, diameter, and mean distance in graphs, Graphs and Combinatorics (7) (1991) 53-64.

  20. C.L. Monma and D.F. Shallcross, Methods for designing communications networks with certain two-connected survivability constraints, Operations Research 37(4) (1989) 531-541.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Soni, R. Gupta and H. Pirkul, Survivable network design: The state of the art, Information Systems Frontiers 1(3) (1999) 303-315.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Steiglitz, P. Weiner and K.J. Kleitman, The design of minimum-cost survivable networks, IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory 16(4) (1969) 455-460.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.W. Surballe and R.E. Tarjan, A quick method for finding shortest pairs of disjoint paths, Networks 14 (1984) 325-336.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Yamato, M. Murata, S. Nishio and H. Mayahara, Design algorithm for survival of fiber optic networks, Electronics and Communications in Japan: Part 1 75(8) (1992) 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberg, E. Capacity Requirements for Node and Arc Survivable Networks. Telecommunication Systems 20, 107–131 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015493417623

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015493417623

Navigation