Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of the GSM-GPRS Air Interface for Real-Time IP Traffic Flows With and Without Packet Dropping

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One IP terminal can occupy a single slot or a multiple number of slots within time frames in the GSM and GPRS, respectively. A limited number of radio resources (slots) are allocated in a base station for such IP terminals. If one IP terminal can occupy only one slot discontinuously in a time frame, there is one possibility resorting to all IP terminals to preserve active mode at a time. Thus, the number of accepted call in the GSM is the same as that of the radio resource. Similarly, if one terminal can occupy a multiple number of slots discontinuously/dynamically in a time frame, the number of accepted calls is obtained by dividing the number of radio resources during that time by the maximum allowed number of slots per IP terminal. A burstiness factor is defined for the IP traffic over GSM-GPRS air interface. Traffic channel efficiency with a bursty real-time IP traffic is unacceptably low, especially with the range of acceptable call loss probabilities pertaining to a lower burstiness factor. The channel efficiency can be enhanced and the call loss probability can be suppressed significantly if a higher maximum number of calls is accepted. Allocated radio resources are less than the maximum number of packet transmissions at a time. Therefore, some packets could be dropped from the real-time transmission system. A complete analysis for the real-time IP packet transmission over the single slot GSM and dynamically variable multislot GPRS air interface without packet dropping, and with packet dropping that increases the channel efficiency is executed. Results show that the channel efficiency as well as the packet dropping probability increases with increasing call intensity, maximum number of admitted IP calls and the burstiness factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. “The UMTS Third Generation Market-Structuring the Service Revenue Opportunities”, UMTS Forum, Report No. 9, September 2000.

  2. S. Nanda, K. Balachandran and S. Kumar, “Adaptation Techniques in Wireless Packet Data Services”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 54–64, Jan., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Cai, Li Fung Chang, K. Chawla and X. Qiu, “Providing Differentiated Services in EGPRS Through Packet Scheduling”, in Global Telecommunications Conference, 2000, GLOBECOM 00, pp. 1515–1521.

  4. P. Chaudhury, W. Mohr and S. Onoe, “The 3GPP Proposal for IMT-2000”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 72–81, Dec., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Dixit, G. Yile and Z. Antoniou, “Resource Management and Quality of Service in Third Generation Wireless Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 125–133, Feb., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Jajszczyk, “What Is the Future of Telecommunications Networking”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 12–20, June, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Gyasi-Agyei, S.J. Halme and J.H. Sarker, “GPRS-Features and Packet Random Access Channel Performance Analysis”, IEEE International Conference on Networks, 2000, (ICON 2000), pp. 13–17.

  8. W. Mohr and W. Konhäuser, “Access Network Evolution Beyond Third Generation Mobile Communications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 122–133, Dec., 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Brasche and B. Walke, “Concepts, Services, and Protocols of the New GSM Phase 2+ General Packet Radio Service”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 94–104, Aug., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.K. Salkintzis, “Packet Data over Cellular Networks: The CDPD Approach”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 152–159, June, 1999.

  11. J.H. Sarker and S.J. Halme, “Bursty IP Speech Traffic over the General Packet Radio Service”, Finnish Wireless Comm. Workshop (FWCW'02), May 2002.

  12. J.W. Roberts, “Traffic Theory and the Internet”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 94–99, Jan., 2001.

  13. D.A. Menasce and V.A.F. Almeida, “Capacity Planning for Web Performance: Matrics, Models, and Methods”, Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Musikka and L. Rinnbäck “Ericsson's IP-Based BSS and Radio Network Server”, Ericsson Review, No. 04, pp. 224–233, 2000.

  15. A. Prasad “Optimization of Hybrid ARQ for IP Packet Transmission”, Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 203–220, March, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.H. Sarker, “Voice and Data Transmission over the TDMA Based Networks”, Master's Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Holma and A. Toskala (ed.), WCDMA for UMTS: Radio Access for Third Generations, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Schwartz, Computer Communication Network Design and Analysis, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Chichester, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Jain, The Are of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Chichester, pp. 620–621, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. GSM 04.60, “Digital Cellular Telecommunications Systems (Phase 2+): General Packet Radio Service (GPRS); Radio Link Control/Medium Access Control (RLC/MAC) Protocol”, July 1998.

  21. S. Ni, Y. Liang and S.-G. Häggman, “Outage Probability in GSM-GPRS Cellular Systems With and Without Frequency Hopping”, Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 215–234, Sept., 2000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarker, J.H., Halme, S.J. Efficiency of the GSM-GPRS Air Interface for Real-Time IP Traffic Flows With and Without Packet Dropping. Wireless Personal Communications 21, 125–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015536922571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015536922571

Navigation