Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks – analyzing the least-angle strategy

  • Published:
Spatial Cognition and Computation

Abstract

The least-angle strategy is a common wayfinding method that can be applied in unknown environments if the target direction is known. The strategy is based on the navigator's heuristic to select the street segment at an intersection which is most in line with the target direction. To use this strategy, the navigator needs to know the angles between the target direction and the street segments leading out from the intersection. If the direct view to the target is blocked and the target vector cannot be perceived, the target direction that is needed for the decision process is based on the agent's believed position and orientation (estimated through path integration). The agent's believed position and target direction are distorted by human errors in estimation of distances and directions, mainly affecting the path integration process. In this paper we examine how human estimation errors of distance and rotation influence the decision behavior in the wayfinding process in an unknown street environment. To demonstrate the geometrical consequences for a specific test case, we use a simulated software agent which navigates in a simulated street environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G.L. (1999). Spatial Abilities, Cognitive Maps, and Wayfinding. In R.G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes (pp. 46–80). Baltimore MD: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson, J., Shum, M. and Uttal, D. (2000). The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection. Memory and Cognition 28(2): 306–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, P. and Morin, P. (1999). Online routing in triangulations. ISAAC'99, Springer.

  • Byrne, R. (1979). Memory for urban geography. Ouarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 31: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. (1990). Representations of Commonsense Knowledge. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R.M. and Stea, S. (1973). Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: process and product. In R.M. Downs and S. Stea (eds.), Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eby, D. and Loomis, J. (1987). A study of visually directed throwing in the presence of multiple distance cues. Perception and Psychophysics 11: 308–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J.M. (1977). Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance. Perception 6: 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C.R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T. and Golledgem R. (2000). Cognitive mapping and spatial decision-making. In R. Kitchin and S. Freundschuh (eds.), Cognitive Mapping - Past, present and future (pp. 44–65). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasauer, S., Amorim, M.-A., Vitte, M.-A. and Berthoz, A. (1994). Goal-directed linear locomotion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. Experimental Brain Research 98: 323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R.G. and Zannaras, G. (1973). Cognitive approaches to the analysis of human spatial behavior. In W. Ittelson (ed.), Environment and Cognition (pp. 59–94). New York: Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R.G. (1995). Path Selection and Route Preference in Human Navigation: A Progress Report. Spatial Information Theory, COSIT '95, Semmering, Austria: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R.G., Jacobson, R.D., Kitchin, R. and Blades, M. (2000). Cognitive Maps, Spatial Abilities, and Human Wayfinding. Geographical Review of Japan 73(Ser. B)(2): 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochmair, H. (2000). ‘least Angle’ Heuristic: Consequences of errors during navigation (abstract). GIScience, Savannah, Georgia, USA: University of California Regents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. and Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and Particulars: Prototype Effects in Estimating Spatial Location. Psychological Review 98(3): 352–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Golledge, R.G., Cicinelli, J.G., Doherty, S. and Pellegrino, J.W. (1990). Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision. Journal of Motor Behavior 22(1): 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S., Pick, H. and Fariello, G. (1974). Cognitive maps in children and men. Child Development 45: 707–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranakis, E., Singh, H. and Urrutia, J. (1999). Compass routing on geometric networks. 11th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry (CCCG'99).

  • Kuipers, B. (182). The ‘Map in the Head’ Metaphor. Environment and Behavior 14: 202-220.

  • Loomis, J.M. and Klatzky, R.L. (1999). Human Navigation by Path Integration. In R.G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes (pp. 125–151). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Cicinelli, J.G., Pellegrino, J.W. and Fry, P.A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122(1): 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, B., Chen, L. and Markus, E. (1991). ‘Dead Reckoning’, Landmark Learning, and the Sense of Direction: A Neorophysiological and Computational Hypothesis. Journal of the Cognitive Neuroscience 3(2): 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon, P. and Denis, M. (2001). When and Why Referring to Visual Landmarks in Direction Giving? COSIT, Morro Bay, California, USA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, H. (1985). Analytical cybernetics of spider navigation. In F.G. Barth (ed.), Neurobiology of arachnids (pp. 298–316). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D.R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment and Behavior 23: 47–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passini, R., Proulx, G. and Rainville, C. (1990). The spatio-cognitive abilities of the visually impaired population. Environment and Behavior 22: 91–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philbeck, J., Loomis, J. and Beall, A. (1997). Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception and Psychophysics 59(4): 601–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S.J. and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence - A Modern Approach. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadalla, E. and Staplin, L. (1980). An information storage model for distance cognition. Environment and Behavior 12: 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadalla, E.K. and Montello, D.R. (1989). Remembering changes in direction. Environment and Behavior 21: 346–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (1996). Haskell - The Craft of Functional Programming. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.A. (1980). How do we use visual information to control locomotion? Trends in Neuroscience 3: 247–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, P. and Hayes-Roth, B. (1981). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology 14: 560–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H. and Golledge, R. (1990). Applications of behavioral research on spatial problems II: Preference and choice. Progress in Human Geography 14: 311–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B. (2000). Levels and structure of spatial knowledge. In R. Kitchin and S. Freundschuh (eds.), Cognitive Mapping - Past, present and future (pp. 24–43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M. (1999). Intelligent Agents. In G. Weiss Multiagent Systems - A modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochmair, H., Frank, A.U. Influence of estimation errors on wayfinding-decisions in unknown street networks – analyzing the least-angle strategy. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2, 283–313 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015566423907

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015566423907

Navigation