Abstract
In this paper we report on the results of an exploratory study of knowledge exchange between disciplines and subfields of science, based on bibliometric methods. The goal of this analysis is twofold. Firstly, we consider knowledge exchange between disciplines at a global level, by analysing cross-disciplinary citations in journal articles, based on the world publication output in 1999. Among others a central position of the Basic Life Sciences within the Life Sciences and of Physics within the Exact Sciences is shown. Limitations of analyses of interdisciplinary impact at the journal level are discussed. A second topic is a discussion of measures which may be used to quantify the rate of knowledge transfer between fields and the importance of work in a given field or for other disciplines. Two measures are applied, which appear to be proper indicators of impact of research on other fields. These indicators of interdisciplinary impact may be applied at other institutional levels as well.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Casimir, H. B. G., Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science, New York: Harper and Row, 1983.
Mansfield, E., Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings, Research Policy, 26 (7–8) (1998) 773–776.
Salter, A. J., B. R. Martin, The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review, Research Policy, 30 (3) (2001) 509–532.
Narin, F., K. S. Hamilton, D. OLIVASTRO, The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26 (3) (1997) 317–330.
Le Pair, C., Switching between academic disciplines in universities in the Netherlands, Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 177–191.
Hargens, L. L., Migration Patterns of U.S. Ph.D.s among disciplines and specialties, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 145–164.
Porter, A. L., D. E. Chubin, An indicator of cross-disciplinary research, Scientometrics 8 (3—4) (1985) 161–176.
Urata, H., Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan, Scientometrics, 18 (3–4) (1990) 309–319.
Steele, T. W., J. C. Stier, The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: a forestry case study, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5) (2000) 478–484.
Morillo, F., M. Bordons, I. Gomez, An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 51(1) (2001) 203–222.
Pierce, S. J., Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of information transfer, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3) (1999) 271–279.
National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators — 2000, Arlington, VA, National Science Foundation, 2000, pp. 6–45.
Kostoff, R. N., J. A. del Rio, The impact of physics research, Physics World, 14(6) (2001) 47–51.
Rinia, E. J., Th. n. van Leeuwen, E. E. W. Bruins, H. G. van Vuren, A. F. J. Van Raan, Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange, Scientometrics, 51(1) (2001) 293–309.
Egghe, L., R. Rousseau, M. Yitzaki, The ‘own-language preference’: measures of ‘relative language self-citation’, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 217–232.
Egghe, L., R. Rousseau, Partial orders and measures for language preferences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (12) (2000) 1123–1130.
Davidse, R. J., A. F. J. Van Raan, Out of particles: Impact of CERN, DESY and SLAC research to fields other than physics, Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 171–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rinia, E.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., Bruins, E.E.W. et al. Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics 54, 347–362 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016078331752
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016078331752