Skip to main content
Log in

Modified AutoDock for accurate docking of protein kinase inhibitors

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein kinases are an important class of enzymes controlling virtually all cellular signaling pathways. Consequently, selective inhibitors of protein kinases have attracted significant interest as potential new drugs for many diseases. Computational methods, including molecular docking, have increasingly been used in the inhibitor design process [1]. We have considered several docking packages in order to strengthen our kinase inhibitor work with computational capabilities. In our experience, AutoDock offered a reasonable combination of accuracy and speed, as opposed to methods that specialize either in fast database searches or detailed and computationally intensive calculations.

However, AutoDock did not perform well in cases where extensive hydrophobic contacts were involved, such as docking of SB203580 to its target protein kinase p38. Another shortcoming was a hydrogen bonding energy function, which underestimated the attraction component and, thus, did not allow for sufficiently accurate modeling of the key hydrogen bonds in the kinase-inhibitor complexes.

We have modified the parameter set used to model hydrogen bonds, which increased the accuracy of AutoDock and appeared to be generally applicable to many kinase-inhibitor pairs without customization. Binding to largely hydrophobic sites, such as the active site of p38, was significantly improved by introducing a correction factor selectively affecting only carbon and hydrogen energy grids, thus, providing an effective, although approximate, treatment of solvation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muegge, I. and Rarey, M., Rev. Comp. Chem., 17 (2001) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baselga, J. and Mendelsohn, J., J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 2 (1997) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pessin, J.E. and Saltiel, A.R., J. Clin. Invest., 106 (2000) 165.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reuter, C.W., Morgan, M.A. and Bergmann, L., Blood, 96 (2000) 1655.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Okamoto, S., Krainc, D., Sherman, K. and Lipton, S.A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97 (2000) 7561.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davies, S.P., Reddy, H., Caivano, M. and Cohen, P., Biochem. J., 351 (2000) 95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dumas, J., Hatoum-Mokdad, H., Sibley, R., Riedl, B., Scott, W.J., Monahan, M.K., Lowinger, T.B., Brennan, C., Natero, R., Turner, T., Johnson, J.S., Schoenleber, R., Bhargava, A., Wilhelm, S.M., Housley, T.J., Ranges, G.E. and Shrikhande, A., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 10 (2000) 2051.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop, A.C., Shah, K., Liu, Y., Witucki, L., Kung, C. and Shokat, K.M., Curr. Biol., 8 (1998) 257.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y., Bishop, A., Witucki, L., Kraybill, B., Shimizu, E., Tsien, J., Ubersax, J., Blethrow, J., Morgan, D.O. and Shokat, K.M., Chem. Biol., 6 (1999) 671.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bishop, A., Buzko, O., Heyeck-Dumas, S., Jung, I., Kraybill, B., Liu, Y., Shah, K., Ulrich, S., Witucki, L., Yang, F., Zhang, C. and Shokat, K.M., Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 29 (2000) 577.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bishop, A.C. and Shokat, K.M., Pharmacol. Ther., 82 (1999) 337.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bishop, A.C., Ubersax, J.A., Petsch, D.T., Matheos, D.P., Gray, N.S., Blethrow, J., Shimizu, E., Tsien, J.Z., Schultz, P.G., Rose, M.D., Wood, J.L., Morgan, D.O. and Shokat, K.M., Nature, 407 (2000) 395.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gillespie, P.G., Gillespie, S.K., Mercer, J.A., Shah, K. and Shokat, K.M., J. Biol. Chem., 274 (1999) 31373.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, E.L., Bishop, A.C., Shokat, K.M. and Drubin, D.G., Nat. Cell. Biol., 2 (2000) 677.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DesJarlais, R.L., Sheridan, R.P., Dixon, J.S., Kuntz, I.D. and Venkataraghavan, R., J. Med. Chem., 29 (1986) 2149.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol. 161 (1982) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goodsell, D.S., Morris, G.M. and Olson, A.J., J. Mol. Recognit., 9 (1996) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Huey, R. and Olson, A.J., J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, G., \Willett, P. and Glen, R.C., J. Mol. Biol., 245 (1995) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol. 267 (1997) 727.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baxter, C.A., Murray, C.W., Waszkowycz, B., Li, J., Sykes, R.A., Bone, R.G., Perkins, T.D. and Wylie, W., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40 (2000) 254.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, Y., Shah, K., Yang, F., Witucki, L. and Shokat, K.M., Chem. Biol., 5 (1998) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bishop, A.C., Kung, C.-Y., Shah, K., Witucki, L., Shokat, K.M. and Liu, Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 121 (1999) 627.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, W., Harrison, S.C. and Eck, M.J., Nature 385 (1997) 595.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schindler, T., Sicheri, F., Pico, A., Gazit, A., Levitzki, A. and Kuriyan, J., Mol. Cell 3 (1999) 639.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sicheri, F., Moarefi, I. and Kuriyan, J., Nature, 385 (1997) 602.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schulze-Gahmen, U., De Bondt, H.L. and Kim, S.H., J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 4540.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kollman, P., Chem. Rev., 93 (1993) 2395.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hon, W.C., McKay, G.A., Thompson, P.R., Sweet, R.M., Yang, D.S., Wright, G.D. and Berghuis, A.M., Cell, 89 (1997) 887.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klebe, G. and Bohm, H.J., J. Recept. Signal Transduct. Res., 17 (1997) 459.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ajay, M.A. Murcko,J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 4953.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holloway, M.K., Perspect. Drug Disc. Res., 9/10/11 (1998) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oprea, T.I. and Marshall, G.R., Perspect. Drug Disc. Des., 9/10/11 (1998) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tame, J.R.H., J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des., 13 (1998) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tokarski, J.S., Hopfinger, A.J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37 (1997) 792.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weiner, S.J., Kollman, P.A., Nguyen, D.T., Case, D.A., J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 230.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Allinger, N.L., Yuh, Y.H. and Lii, J.-H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111 (1989) 8551.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cornell, W.D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C.I., Gould, I.R., Merz, K.M., Ferguson, D.M., Spellmeyer, D.C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J.W. and Kollman, P.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 (1995) 5179.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gao, J. and Xia, X., Science, 258 (1992) 631.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Han, W.G., Tajkhorshid, E. and Suhai, S., J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 16 (1999) 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Friesner, R.A. and Beachy, M.D., Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 8 (1998) 257.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Perakyla, M. and Pakkanen, T.A., Proteins, 20 (1994) 367.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu, X., Kim, J.L., Newcomb, J.R., Rose, P.E., Stover, D.R., Toledo, L.M., Zhao, H. and Morgenstern, K.A., Structure Fold. Des., 7 (1999) 651.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Somwar, R., Perreault, M., Kapur, S., Taha, C., Sweeney, G., Ramlal, T., Kim, D.Y., Keen, J., Cote, C.H., Klip, A. and Marette, A., Diabetes, 49 (2000) 1794.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hutter, D., Chen, P., Barnes, J. and Liu, Y., Biochem. J., 352 Pt 1 (2000) 155.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wilson, K.P., Fitzgibbon, M.J., Caron, P.R., Griffith, J.P., Chen, W., McCaffrey, P.G., Chambers, S.P. and Su, M.S., J. Biol. Chem., 271 (1996) 27696.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Morris, G.M., Goodsell, D.S., Halliday, R.S., Huey, R., Hart, W.E., Belew, R.K. and Olson, A.J., J. Comp. Chem., 19 (1998) 1639.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shoichet, B.K., Leach, A.R. and Kuntz, I.D., Proteins, 34 (1999) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Richards, W.G., King, P.M. and Reynolds, C.A., Protein Eng., 2 (1989) 319.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Eisenberg, D. and McLachlan, A.D., Nature, 319 (1986) 199.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kang, Y.K., Nemethy, G. and Scheraga, H.A., J. Phys. Chem., 91 (1987) 4105.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Motoc, I. and Marshall, G.R., Chem. Phys. Lett., 116 (1985) 415.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stouten, P.F.W., Frommel, C., Nakamura, H. and Sander, C., Mol. Simulation, 10 (1993) 97.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bashford, D. and Case, D.A., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 51 (2000) 129.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dennis, S., Camacho, C.J. and Vajda, S., Proteins, 38 (2000) 176.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lee, M.R., Duan, Y. and Kollman, P.A., Proteins, 39 (2000) 309.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lang, R., Kocourek, A., Braun, M., Tschesche, H., Huber, R. and Bode, Maskos, K., J. Mol. Biol., 312 (2001) 731.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xu, W., Doshi, A., Lei, M., Eck, M.J. and Harrison, S.C.,Mol. Cell., 3 (1999) 629.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleksandr V. Buzko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buzko, O.V., Bishop, A.C. & Shokat, K.M. Modified AutoDock for accurate docking of protein kinase inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16, 113–127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016366013656

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016366013656

Navigation