Skip to main content
Log in

Testing Time Series for Nonlinearity

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The technique of surrogate data analysis may be employed to test the hypothesis that an observed data set was generated by one of several specific classes of dynamical system. Current algorithms for surrogate data analysis enable one, in a generic way, to test for membership of the following three classes of dynamical system: (0) independent and identically distributed noise, (1) linearly filtered noise, and (2) a monotonic nonlinear transformation of linearly filtered noise.

We show that one may apply statistics from nonlinear dynamical systems theory, in particular those derived from the correlation integral, as test statistics for the hypothesis that an observed time series is consistent with each of these three linear classes of dynamical system. Using statistics based on the correlation integral we show that it is also possible to test much broader (and not necessarily linear) hypotheses.

We illustrate these methods with radial basis models and an algorithm to estimate the correlation dimension. By exploiting some special properties of this correlation dimension estimation algorithm we are able to test very specific hypotheses. Using these techniques we demonstrate the respiratory control of human infants exhibits a quasi-periodic orbit (the obvious inspiratory/expiratory cycle) together with cyclic amplitude modulation. This cyclic amplitude modulation manifests as a stable focus in the first return map (equivalently, the sequence of successive peaks).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abarbanel H.D.I., Brown R., Sidorowich J.J., and Tsimring L.S. 1993. The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems. Reviews of Modern Physics 65: 1331-1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casdagli M.C., Iasemidis L.D., Sackellares J.C., Roper S.N., Glimore R.L., and Savit R.S. 1996. Characterizing nonlinearity in invasive EEG recordings from temporal lobe epilepsy. Physica D 99: 381-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding M., Grebogi C., Ott E., Sauer T., and Yorke J.A. 1993. Plateau onset for correlation dimension: when does it occur? Physical Review Letters 70: 3872-3875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer J.D., Ott E., and Yorke J.A. 1983. The dimension of chaotic attractors. Physica D 7: 153-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galka A., Maaß T., and Pfister G. 1998. Estimating the dimension of high-dimensional attractors: A comparison between two algorithms. Physica D 121: 237-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassberger P. and Procaccia I. 1983. Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D 9: 189-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guckenheimer J. and Holmes P. 1983. Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields, Volume 42. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeguchi T. and Aihara K. 1997. Estimating correlation dimensions of biological time series with a reliable method. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 5: 33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd K. 1992.Animproved estimator of dimension and some comments on providing confidence intervals. Physica D 56: 216-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd K. 1994. Estimating dimension from small samples. Physica D 71: 421-429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd K. and Mees A. 1995. On selecting models for nonlinear time series. Physica D 82: 426-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennel M.B., Brown R., and Abarbanel H.D.I. 1992. Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometric construction. Physical Review A 45: 3403-3411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noakes L. 1991. The Takens embedding theorem. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 1: 867-872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestly M.B. 1989. Non-Linear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissanen J. 1989. Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry. World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid G.B. and Dünki R.M. 1996. Indications of nonlinearity, intraindividual specificity and stability of human EEG: the unfolding dimension. Physica D 93: 165-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber T. and Schmitz A. 1996. Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physical Review Letters 77: 635-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M. and Judd K. 1997. Using surrogate data to test for nonlinearity in experimental data. International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications,Volume 2, Research Society of Nonlinear Theory and its Applications, IEICE, pp. 1133-1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M. and Judd K. 1998a. Comparison of new nonlinear modelling techniques with applications to infant respiration. Physica D 117: 283-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M. and Judd K. 1998b. Detecting nonlinearity in experimental data. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 8: 1231-1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M. and Judd K. 1998c. Pivotal statistics for non-constrained realizations of composite null hypotheses in surrogate data analysis. Physica D 120: 386-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M. and Judd K. 1999. Detecting periodicity in experimental data using linear modeling techniques. Physical Review E 59(2) pp. 1379-1385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M., Judd K., Lowe M., and Stick S. 1999. Is breathing in infants chaotic? Dimension estimates for respiratory patterns during quiet sleep. Journal of Applied Physiology 86: 359-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small M., Judd K., and Stick S. 1996. Linear modelling techniques detect periodic respiratory behaviour in infants during regular breathing in quiet sleep. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care Medicine 153: A79. (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takens F. 1981. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898: 366-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takens F. 1993. Detecting nonlinearities in stationary time series. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 3: 241-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler J. 1990. Estimating fractal dimension. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 7: 1055-1073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler J. 1995. On the evidence for low-dimensional chaos in an epileptic electroencephalogram. Physics Letters A 196: 335-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler J., Eubank S., Longtin A., Galdrikian B., and Farmer J.D. 1992. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58: 77-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler J. and Prichard D. 1996. Constrained-realization Monte-Carlo method for hypothesis testing. Physica D 94: 221-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler J. and Rapp P. 1996. Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology 98: 213-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibe K. and Vesin J.-M. 1996. On chaos detection methods. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 6: 529-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggener T.B., Brusil P.J., Kronauer R.E., Gabel R.A., and Inbar G.F. 1984. Strength and cycle time of high-altitude ventilatory patterns in unacclimatized humans. Journal of Applied Physiology 56: 576-581.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Small, M., Judd, K. & Mees, A. Testing Time Series for Nonlinearity. Statistics and Computing 11, 257–268 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016604405201

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016604405201

Navigation