Skip to main content
Log in

Early reactions to information growth

  • Other Index
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The expansion in the number of journals being published really took off in the nineteenth century. Between the beginning and end of that century, the problems of dealing with the spread of literature appearing consequently grew rapidly. The reactions of scientists to this included a move towards increasing specialisation in their research, and a higher level of organisation of their communication activities. In particular, ways of assisting information retrieval were developed then which became extremely important in the twentieth century. Two of these developments are examined here — the provision of abstracts for scientists and of popular articles for non-scientists. Parallels can be found between these two activities, as well as differences due to the different target audiences. It is noted that both appeared in print environment: an electronic environment may affect their futures differently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. D.J. de S. Price, Little science, big science, Columbia University Press, New York, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Goffman, Coping with the biomedical literature explosion: a qualitative approach, Rockefeller Foundation, New York, 1978, pp. 11-19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. W. Hulme, Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilisation, Grafton, London, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in: J. G. Crowther, British scientists of the nineteenth century, (Vol. 1), Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK, 1940, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quoted in: H. Boxenbaum, Literature growth in pharmacokinetics, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 10 (1982) 335-348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nature, 39 (1889) 418.

  7. Quoted in: A.J. Meadows, Science and controversy, Macmillan, London; 1972, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. M. Manzer, The abstract journal, 1790–1920: origin, development and diffusion, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. S. Moore, J. C. Philip, The Chemical Society 1841-1941, Chemical Society, London, 1947, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nature, 3 (1871) 423.

  11. R. T. Bottle, The declining readability of scientific papers as a factor limiting the transfer and use of knowledge,. In: H. J. Dietschmann (Ed.), Representation and exchange of knowledge as a basis of information processes, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 175-184.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. J. Meadows, The readability of physics papers, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B36 (1986) 89-91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nature, 2 (1870) 161-162.

  14. L. Huxley, Life and letters of Thomas Henry Huxley, (Vol. I), Macmillan, London, 1900, p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nature, 8 (1873) 381.

  16. Nature, 51 (1894) 162.

  17. Nature, 50 (1894) 300.

  18. Nature, 50 (1894) 301.

  19. R. Yeo, Defining science, Cambridge University Press, 1993, p. 231.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meadows, J. Early reactions to information growth. Scientometrics 51, 553–561 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019651204378

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019651204378

Navigation