Skip to main content
Log in

Scholarly communication as a socioecological system

  • Other Index
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among Belver C. Griffith's many contributions to disciplinary communication is the idea that science and scholarship at large constitute a social system to be investigated empirically. This paper reports findings of an author co-citation analysis of the field of human behavioral ecology that expands Griffith's concept of the social system of scientific communication to fit a socioecological framework. Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling techniques are used to characterize the research specialty at large and portray five respondents' individual resource maps. The techniques reveal co-citation relationships among authors whose work they had referenced in recent articles. Survey data on searching and handling behaviors for an aggregated sample of 180 cited references are correlated with core-periphery zones of the individual maps. Findings that types of socially mediated communication and distinctive information foraging behaviors correlate with different zones of a bibliographic microhabitat support an interpretation that active specialty members conform to foraging efficiency principles as predicted by prey-choice models from optimal foraging theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bates, M. J. (1996), Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students, Library Trends, 45(2): 155-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. (1988), Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blurton Jones, N. G. (1990), Three sensible paradigms for research on evolution and human behavior?,Ethology and Sociobiology, 11: 353-359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1991), Human behavioural ecology, In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd ed., J. R. Krebs, N. B. Davies (Eds), Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 69-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. (1970), The nature of scientific communication and influence, International Social Science Journal, 22(1): 28-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Hert C. A. (1995), Scholarly foraging and network discovery tools, Journal of Documentation, 51(4): 388-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, L. (1991), Human behavioral ecology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 25-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, W. H. (1990), Advances in evolutionary culture theory, Annual Review of Anthropology, 19: 187-210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, D. (1989), A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design, Journal of Documentation, 45(3): 171-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1967), Scientific communication as a social system, Science, 157: 1011-1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, W. D., Griffith B. C. (1971), Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge, American Psychologist, 26(4): 349-362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973), The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. C. (1989), Understanding science: Studies of communication and information, Communication Research, 16(5): 600-614; Also in: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 31–45.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. C., Mullins, N. C. (1972), Coherent social groups in scientific change, Science, 177: 959-964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. A., Dey, S. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro-and microstructure for science, Science Studies, 4: 339-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpending, H., Rogers, A., Draper, P. (1987), Human sociobiology, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 30: 127-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HjØrland, B., Albrechtsen, H. (1995), Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6): 400-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., Nadel, E. (1987), Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists, Social Networks, 9: 217-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1986), Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3): 111-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1990a), Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 433-443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1990b), Mapping authors in intellectual space: Population genetics in the 1980s. In: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 194-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L., Hecht, P. K., Kick, E. L. (1977), The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study, American Sociological Review, 42: 552-562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P., Card, S. (1999), Information foraging, Psychological Review, 106(4): 643-675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, I. (1999), Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure, Scientometrics, 44(3): 533-546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, P. E. (1994), An optimal foraging approach to information seeking and use, Library Quarterly, 64(4): 414-449.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom, P. E. (1998), Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human behavioral ecology: An author co-citation analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Sandstrom, P. E. (1999), Scholars as subsistence foragers, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(3): 17-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 265-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H.. (1978), Cited documents as concept symbols, Social Studies of Science, 8: 327-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., Griffith, B. C. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, Science Studies, 4: 17-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (1983), Anthropological applications of optimal foraging theory: A critical review, Current Anthropology, 24(5): 625-651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (1992a), Human behavioral ecology: I, Evolutionary Anthropology, 1(1): 20-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (1992b), Human behavioral ecology: II, Evolutionary Anthropology, 1(2): 50-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A., Winterhalder, B. (Eds) (1992), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, M. E. (1976), Characteristics and use of personal collections, Library Quarterly, 26(4): 397-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (1981), “Bradfordizing” search output: How it would help online users, Online Review, 5(1): 47-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (1986), Cocited author retrieval, Information Technology and Libraries, 5: 93-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (1990), Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 84-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (1996), Literature retrieval for interdisciplinary syntheses, Library Trends, 45(2): 239-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., Griffith, B. C. (1981), Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., Griffith, B. C. (1982), Authors as markers of intellectual space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology, and society, Journal of Documentation, 38(4): 255-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1989) Bibliometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24: 119-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1997), Visualization of literatures, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32: 99-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1998), Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4): 327-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (2000), In memory of Belver C. Griffith, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10): 959-962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (1977), Private Knowledge, Public Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (1992), Searching: Strategies and evaluation. In: For Information Professionals: Interpretations of Reference and Bibliographic Work, H. D. White, M. J. Bates, P. Wilson, Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corp., 153-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (1995), Unused relevant information in research and development, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1): 45-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. (1996), Interdisciplinary research and information overload, Library Trends, 45(2): 192-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P., Farid, M. (1979), On the use of the records of research, Library Quarterly, 49(2): 127-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., Smith, E. A. (1981), Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., Smith, E. A. (2000), Analyzing adaptive strategies: Human behavioral ecology at twenty-five, Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(2): 51-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandstrom, P.E. Scholarly communication as a socioecological system. Scientometrics 51, 573–605 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019655305286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019655305286

Navigation