Abstract
Among Belver C. Griffith's many contributions to disciplinary communication is the idea that science and scholarship at large constitute a social system to be investigated empirically. This paper reports findings of an author co-citation analysis of the field of human behavioral ecology that expands Griffith's concept of the social system of scientific communication to fit a socioecological framework. Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling techniques are used to characterize the research specialty at large and portray five respondents' individual resource maps. The techniques reveal co-citation relationships among authors whose work they had referenced in recent articles. Survey data on searching and handling behaviors for an aggregated sample of 180 cited references are correlated with core-periphery zones of the individual maps. Findings that types of socially mediated communication and distinctive information foraging behaviors correlate with different zones of a bibliographic microhabitat support an interpretation that active specialty members conform to foraging efficiency principles as predicted by prey-choice models from optimal foraging theory.
References
Bates, M. J. (1996), Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students, Library Trends, 45(2): 155-164.
Bernard, H. R. (1988), Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Blurton Jones, N. G. (1990), Three sensible paradigms for research on evolution and human behavior?,Ethology and Sociobiology, 11: 353-359.
Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1991), Human behavioural ecology, In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd ed., J. R. Krebs, N. B. Davies (Eds), Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 69-98.
Crane, D. (1970), The nature of scientific communication and influence, International Social Science Journal, 22(1): 28-41.
Cronin, B., Hert C. A. (1995), Scholarly foraging and network discovery tools, Journal of Documentation, 51(4): 388-403.
Cronk, L. (1991), Human behavioral ecology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 25-53.
Durham, W. H. (1990), Advances in evolutionary culture theory, Annual Review of Anthropology, 19: 187-210.
Ellis, D. (1989), A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design, Journal of Documentation, 45(3): 171-212.
Garvey, W. D., Griffith, B. C. (1967), Scientific communication as a social system, Science, 157: 1011-1116.
Garvey, W. D., Griffith B. C. (1971), Scientific communication: Its role in the conduct of research and creation of knowledge, American Psychologist, 26(4): 349-362.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973), The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
Griffith, B. C. (1989), Understanding science: Studies of communication and information, Communication Research, 16(5): 600-614; Also in: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 31–45.
Griffith, B. C., Mullins, N. C. (1972), Coherent social groups in scientific change, Science, 177: 959-964.
Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. A., Dey, S. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro-and microstructure for science, Science Studies, 4: 339-365.
Harpending, H., Rogers, A., Draper, P. (1987), Human sociobiology, Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 30: 127-150.
HjØrland, B., Albrechtsen, H. (1995), Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6): 400-425.
Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U., Nadel, E. (1987), Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists, Social Networks, 9: 217-248.
McCain, K. W. (1986), Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3): 111-122.
McCain, K. W. (1990a), Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 433-443.
McCain, K. W. (1990b), Mapping authors in intellectual space: Population genetics in the 1980s. In: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 194-216.
Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L., Hecht, P. K., Kick, E. L. (1977), The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study, American Sociological Review, 42: 552-562.
Pirolli, P., Card, S. (1999), Information foraging, Psychological Review, 106(4): 643-675.
Rowlands, I. (1999), Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: Evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure, Scientometrics, 44(3): 533-546.
Sandstrom, P. E. (1994), An optimal foraging approach to information seeking and use, Library Quarterly, 64(4): 414-449.
Sandstrom, P. E. (1998), Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human behavioral ecology: An author co-citation analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Sandstrom, P. E. (1999), Scholars as subsistence foragers, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(3): 17-20.
Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 265-269.
Small, H.. (1978), Cited documents as concept symbols, Social Studies of Science, 8: 327-340.
Small, H., Griffith, B. C. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, Science Studies, 4: 17-40.
Smith, E. A. (1983), Anthropological applications of optimal foraging theory: A critical review, Current Anthropology, 24(5): 625-651.
Smith, E. A. (1992a), Human behavioral ecology: I, Evolutionary Anthropology, 1(1): 20-25.
Smith, E. A. (1992b), Human behavioral ecology: II, Evolutionary Anthropology, 1(2): 50-53.
Smith, E. A., Winterhalder, B. (Eds) (1992), Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Soper, M. E. (1976), Characteristics and use of personal collections, Library Quarterly, 26(4): 397-415.
White, H. D. (1981), “Bradfordizing” search output: How it would help online users, Online Review, 5(1): 47-54.
White, H. D. (1986), Cocited author retrieval, Information Technology and Libraries, 5: 93-99.
White, H. D. (1990), Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In: Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 84-106.
White, H. D. (1996), Literature retrieval for interdisciplinary syntheses, Library Trends, 45(2): 239-264.
White, H. D., Griffith, B. C. (1981), Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-171.
White, H. D., Griffith, B. C. (1982), Authors as markers of intellectual space: Co-citation in studies of science, technology, and society, Journal of Documentation, 38(4): 255-272.
White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1989) Bibliometrics, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24: 119-186.
White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1997), Visualization of literatures, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32: 99-168.
White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (1998), Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4): 327-355.
White, H. D., McCain, K. W. (2000), In memory of Belver C. Griffith, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10): 959-962.
Wilson, P. (1977), Private Knowledge, Public Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Wilson, P. (1992), Searching: Strategies and evaluation. In: For Information Professionals: Interpretations of Reference and Bibliographic Work, H. D. White, M. J. Bates, P. Wilson, Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corp., 153-182.
Wilson, P. (1995), Unused relevant information in research and development, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1): 45-51.
Wilson, P. (1996), Interdisciplinary research and information overload, Library Trends, 45(2): 192-203.
Wilson, P., Farid, M. (1979), On the use of the records of research, Library Quarterly, 49(2): 127-145.
Winterhalder, B., Smith, E. A. (1981), Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Winterhalder, B., Smith, E. A. (2000), Analyzing adaptive strategies: Human behavioral ecology at twenty-five, Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(2): 51-72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandstrom, P.E. Scholarly communication as a socioecological system. Scientometrics 51, 573–605 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019655305286
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019655305286