Skip to main content
Log in

Belver and Henry

  • Other Index
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the similarity of the above title to a movie of recent vintage, I do not want to give the impression that this is material for a Hollywood script about two guys who attempt to drive off a cliff. I undertake this account of my work with Belver Griffith, not so much as history, but more as personal therapy, reflection on a creative and sometimes difficult collaboration, and an opportunity to contrast our views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. H. Small, Nuclear physics in the Physical Review: 1927-1934, Report on NSF Grant 3235, New York: American Institute for Physics, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Small, Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265-269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Price, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience, In: C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollock (Eds), Communication among scientists and engineers, Lexinon, Mass.: Heath Lexington Books, 1970, pp. 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. C. Griffith, A. J. Miller, Networks of informal communication among scientifically productive scientists, In: C. E. NELSON, D. K. Pollock (Eds), Communication among scientists and engineers, Lexington, Mass.: Heath Lexington Books, 1970, pp. 126-140.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Unfortunately this manuscript appears to be lost.

  6. B. C. Griffith, N. C. Mullins, Coherent social groups in scientific change, Science, 177 (1972) 959-964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Small, B. C. Griffith, The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17-40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. B. Kruskal, Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis, Psychometrica, 29 (1964) 1-27.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Small, A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research, Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 139-166.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Small, A passage through science: crossing disciplinary boundaries, Library Trends, 48 (1999) 72-108.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. C. Griffith, H. Small, J. Stonehill, S. Dey, The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macrostructure and microstructure for science, Science Studies, 4 (1974) 339-365.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. D. White, B. C. Griffith, Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (1881) 163-171.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. C. Griffith, On the nature of literature growth and aging: Defining an “active” scholarly literature, In: M. E. D. Koenig, A. Bookstein (Eds), Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Medford, NJ: Learned Information, 1995 pp. 197-206.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Small, H. Belver and Henry. Scientometrics 51, 487–491 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019690918490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019690918490

Navigation