Abstract
This paper proposes an optimum bidding policy in a competitive network provider's environment, where each network provider can bid for individual connection requests according to its own criteria. The proposed bidding policy is based on the concept of “shadow price.” In other words, each network provider bids only for connection requests with an expected profit exceeding its “shadow price.” Because such connection request brings profit in the long term, each network provider can maximize its long-term profit by adopting this bidding policy. In this paper, the optimum bidding policy for network providers is analyzed by means of the policy iteration method derived from the Markov decision theory. The economic efficiency of the bidding policy is evaluated using several numerical examples, in which each network provider adopts fixed pricing and state-dependent pricing, respectively. By adopting the bidding policy in both cases, each network provider can maximize its long-term profit while the total users' consumer surplus is slightly reduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.E. Carroll and P.A. Kirkby, Proportionally fair pricing: dynamics, stability and pathology, IEE Proceedings-Communications 1476(1) (2000) 23-31.
R. Davis and R.G. Smith, Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving, Artificial Intelligence 20(1) (1983) 63-109.
A. Dhebar and S.S. Oren, Dynamic nonlinear pricing in networks with interdependent demand, Operations Research 34(3) (1986) 384-394.
Z. Dziong and L.G. Mason, Call admission and routing in multi-service loss networks, IEEE Trans-actions on Communications 42(2-4) (1994) 2011-2022.
R.H. Hwang, J.F. Kurose and D. Towsley, State dependent routing for multirate loss networks, in: Proc. of IEEE Globecom' 92, 1992, pp. 565-570.
S. Jordan and H. Jiang, Connection establishment in high-speed networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 13(7) (1995) 1150-1161.
F.P. Kelly, Routing in circuit-switched networks: Optimization, shadow prices and decentralization, Advanced Applied Probability 20 (1988) 112-144.
K. Kuwabara, T. Ishida, Y. Nishibe and T. Suda, An equilibrium market-based approach for distributed resource allocation and its application to communication network control, in: Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation, ed. S.H. Clearwater (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996).
J.K. MacKie-Mason, L. Murphy and J. Murphy, Responsive pricing in the Internet, in: Internet Economics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997) pp. 279-303.
J.K. MacKie-Mason and H.R. Varian, Pricing congestible network resources, IEEE Journal on Se-lected Areas in Communications 13(7) (1995) 1141-1149.
H. Nakamura, H. Yokoyama and T. Oda, Advanced mechanism of user-network interaction for efficient use of network resources, in: Proc. of Networks'96, 1996, pp. 613-618.
H. Nakamura, H. Yokoyama and T. Oda, Effectiveness of state-dependent pricing for a circuit switched network, in: Proc. of 11th ITC Specialist Seminar, 1998, pp. 156-165.
N. Ogino, Connection establishment protocol based on mutual selection between users and network providers, Decision Support Systems 28 (2000) 61-70.
T.J. Ott and K.R. Krishnan, State-dependent routing of telephone traffic and the use of separable routing schemes, in: Proc. of 11th ITC, 1985.
J.S. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin, Designing conventions for automated negotiation, AI Magazine 29 (1994) 29-46.
S.M. Ross, Introduction to Stochastic Dynamic Programming (Academic Press, New York, 1983).
Q. Wang and J. Peha, State-dependent pricing and its economic implications, in: Proc. of the 7th Internat. Conf. on Telecommunications Systems Modeling and Analysis, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogino, N. Performance Analysis of Bidding Policy for Competitive Network Providers. Telecommunication Systems 21, 65–86 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020311620989
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020311620989