Skip to main content
Log in

Interactive Critiquing forCatalog Navigation in E-Commerce

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-commerce sites can have large, essentiallyunbounded, catalogs. With large catalogs comesincreasing difficulty for buyers in making useof standard search and browsing facilities.Particularly in the case of casual oroccasional buyers and in the case of complexproducts, the gap between a product'sspecifications and the buyer's understanding ofneed can be hard to bridge. An effectivee-commerce catalog must map user needs toproducts that can fulfill them. This paperdescribes an interactive, incremental,case-based, critiquing approach to solving thisproblem. The approach is interactive andincremental, so it does not require that theuser have a completely specified need at thestart. The system is case-based in that itemphasizes products over features orconstraints, and uses case-based reasoningtechniques for its product retrieval. Finally,the approach is based on the critiquing ofpresented examples, each critique redirectingthe search to home in on appropriate products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergmann, R., Breen, S., Göker, M., Manago, M. & Wess, S. (1999). Developing Industrial Case-Based Reasoning Applications: The INRECA Methodology. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 1612. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (1999). The Wasabi Personal Shopper: A Case-Based Recommender System. In Proceedings the 11th Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (2000). Knowledge-Based Recommender Systems. In Kent, A. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Systems, 69, Supplement 32.

  • Burke, R. (in press). Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction.

  • Burke, R., Hammond, K. & Young, B. (1997). The FindMe Approach to Assisted Browsing. IEEE Expert 12: 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, D. R., Pederson, J. O., Charger, D. & Turkey, J. W. (1992). Scatter/Gather: A cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM/SIGIR Conference, 318–329. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. & Bridge, D. (2000). Partial Orders and Indifference Relations: Being Purpose-fully Vague in Case-Based Retrieval. In Blanzieri, E. & Portinale, L. (eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (EWCBR-00), Lecture Notes in AI 1898, 74–85. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, W., Bareiss, R., Birnbaum, L. & Osgood, R. (1992). ASK Systems: An Approach to the Realization of Story-Based Teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2, 95–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foskett, D. J. (1980). Thesaurus. In Kent, A., Lancour, H. & Daily, J. E. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science 30, 416–462. New York: Marcel Dekker. Reprinted in K. Sparck-Jones and P. Willett (eds.) Readings in Information Retrieva, 111–134. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M. & Terry, D. (1992). Using Collaborative Filtering to Weave an Information Tapestry. Communications of the ACM 35, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, R. H. (1998). Merchant Differentiation through Integrative Negotiation in Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce. Master's Thesis, School of Architecture and Planning, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Hagen, P. R., Manning, H. & Paul, Y. (2000). Must Search Stink? The Forrester Report (June). Hill, W.C., Stead, L., Rosenstein, M. and Furnas, G. (1995). Recommending and Evaluating Choices in a Virtual Community of Use. In Proceedings of TICHI'95, 194–201. Denver CO: ACM Press, May

  • Keeney, R. L. & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, J., Miller, B., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J., Gordon, L. & Riedl, J. (1997). GroupLens: Applying Collaborative Filtering to Usenet News. Communications of the ACM 40, 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, P., Guttman, R. H. & Moukas, A. G. (1999). Agents that Buy and Sell. Communications of the ACM 42, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B. & Johnson, C. (1990). The Psychology of Consumer Behavior. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P. & Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. In CSCW' 94: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 175–186. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesbeck, C. & Schank, R. C. (1989). Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G. & McGill, M. (1983). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval.NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J. & Riedl, J. (1999). Recommender Systems in E-Commerce. In EC' 99: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 158–166. Denver, CO.

  • Schank, R. C. & Riesbeck, C. (1981). Inside Computer Understanding: Five Programs with Miniatures. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, B. (1994). Dynamic Queries for Visual Information Seeking. IEEE Software 11, 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shardanand, U. & Maes, P. (1995). Social Information Filtering Algorithms for Automating “Word of Mouth” In CHI-95: Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 210–217. New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, B. & McClave, P. (2001). Similarity vs. Diversity. In Aha, D. W. & Watson, I. (eds.) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR-01), Lecture Notes in AI 2080, 347–361. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath, I., Wilke, W. & Bergmann, R. (1998). Case-Based Reasoning Support for Online Catalog Sales. IEEE Internet Computing 2: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, I. (1997). Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for Enterprise Systems San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burke, R. Interactive Critiquing forCatalog Navigation in E-Commerce. Artificial Intelligence Review 18, 245–267 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020701617138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020701617138

Navigation