Skip to main content
Log in

Chemoinformatics methods for systematic comparison of molecules from natural and synthetic sources and design of hybrid libraries

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until recently, the field of diversity and library design has more or less ignored natural products as a compound source. This is probably due to at least two reasons. First, combinatorial and reaction-based approaches have been major focal points in the early days of computational library design. In addition, a widespread view is that natural products are often highly complex and not amenable to medicinal chemistry efforts. This contribution introduces recent computational approaches to systematically analyze natural molecules and bridge the gap between natural products and synthetic chemistry programs. Large scale comparisons of natural and synthetic molecules are discussed as well as studies designed to identify `synthetic mimics' of natural products with specific activity. In addition, a concept for the design of natural/synthetic hybrid libraries is introduced. Although research in this area is still in its early stages, an important lesson to be learned from computational analyses is that there is no need to a priori `shy away' from natural products as a source for molecular design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cragg, G.M., Newman, D.J., Snader, K.M., J. Nat. Prod., 60 (1997) 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grabley, S. and Thiericke, R., Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., 64 (1999) 101–154.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harvey, A., Drug Discov. Today, 5 (2000) 294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Strohl, W.R., Drug Discov. Today, 5 (2000), 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wessjohann, L., Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed., 106 (1994), 1011–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolaou, K.C., Dai, W.-M., Guy, R.K., Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed., 106 (1994), 38–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cragg, G.M., Med. Res. Rev., 18 (1998), 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drews, J., Science, 287 (2000), 1960–1964.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lahana, R., Drug Discov. Today, 4 (1999), 447–448.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawrence, R.N., Drug Discov. Today, 4 (1999), 449–451.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boulton, S.J., Vincent, S. and Vidal, M., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 5 (2001), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cragg, G.M. and Newman, D., Chem. Br., 37 (2001), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wessjohann, L.A., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 4 (2000), 303–309.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan, D.S., Foley, M.A., Shair, M.D. and Schreiber, S.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120 (1998), 8565–8566.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolaou, K.C., Winssinger, N., Pastor, J., Ninkovic, S., Sarabia, F., He, Y., Vourloumis, D., Yang, Z., Li, T., Giannakakou, P. and Hamel, E., Nature, 387 (1997), 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Höfle, G. and Sefkow, M., Heterocycles, 48 (1998), 2485–2488.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Turner, N. and Schneider, M., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 4 (2000), 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mason, J.S. and Hermsmeier, M.A., Diversity assessment, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 3 (1999), 342–349.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, Y.C., J. Comb. Chem., 3 (2001), 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Henkel, T., Brunne, R. M., Müller, H. and Reichel, F., Angew. Chemie. Intl. Ed., 38 (1999), 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, M.-L. and Schneider, G., J. Comb. Chem., 3 (2001), 284–289.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kohonen, T., Biol. Cybern., 43 (1982), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gillet, V.J., Willett, P. and Bradshaw, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998), 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41 (2001), 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  25. ACD (Available Chemicals Directory), MDL Information Systems Inc., 14600 Catalina Street, San Leandro, CA 94577.

  26. Chapman & Hall, Dictionary of Natural Products, CD-ROM 1999 version, CRC Press LLC, NW Corporate Blvd, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.

  27. Godden, J.W. and Bajorath, J., J. Mol. Graph. Mod., 18 (2000), 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Godden, J.W. and Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41 (2001), 1060–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stahura, F.L., Godden, J.W., Xue, L. and Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40 (2000), 1245–1252.

    Google Scholar 

  30. MACCS keys, MDL Information Systems Inc., 14600 Catalina Street, San Leandro, CA 94577.

  31. Labute, P., Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 7 (1999), 444–455.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weber, L., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 4 (2000), 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dragoli, D.R., Thompson, L.A., O'Brien, J., and Ellman, J.A., J. Comb. Chem., 1 (1999), 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xue, L., Godden, J.W. and Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 40 (2000), 1227–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stahura, F.L., Xue, L., Godden, J.W. and Bajorath, J. J. Mol. Model., 6 (2000), 550–562.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xue, L., Godden, J.W., Stahura, F.L. and Bajorath, J., J. Mol. Model., 7 (2001), 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Willett, P., Barnard, J.M. and Downs, G.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998), 983–996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xue, L. and Bajorath, J., J. Mol. Model., 5 (1999), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lewell, X.Q., Judd, D.B., Watson, S.P. and Hann, M.M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 38 (1998), 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  40. MOE (Molecular Operating Environment), Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1255 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3B 3X3.

  41. Martinez, J.L. Jr., Jensen, R.A. and McGaugh, J.L., Prog. Neurobiol., 16 (1981), 155–186.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kato, K., Ito, H., Iwamoto, I., Lida, K. and Inaguma, Y., Cell Stress Chaperones, 6 (2001), 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bajorath, J. Chemoinformatics methods for systematic comparison of molecules from natural and synthetic sources and design of hybrid libraries. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16, 431–439 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020868022748

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020868022748

Navigation