Skip to main content
Log in

A validation study on the practical use of automated de novo design

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The de novo design program Skelgen has been used to design inhibitor structures for four targets of pharmaceutical interest. The designed structures are compared to modeled binding modes of known inhibitors (i) visually and (ii) by means of a novel similarity measure considering the size and spatial proximity of the maximum common substructure of two small molecules. It is shown that the Skelgen algorithm generates representatives of many inhibitor classes within a very short time and that the new similarity measure is useful for comparing and clustering designed structures. The results demonstrate the necessity of properly defining search constraints in practical applications of de novo design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murcko, M. A. In Lipkowitz, K. B. and Boyd, D. B. (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry 11, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997, pp. 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, D. E., Murray, C. W. and Li, J. in Lipkowitz, K. B. and Boyd, D. B. (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry 11, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997, pp. 67–126.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stahl, M. In Schneider, G. and Boehm, H.-J. (eds.), Virtual Screening for Bioactive Molecules VCH, Weinheim, 2000, pp. 229–264.

  4. Tame, J. R. H., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boehm, H.-J. and Stahl, M., Med. Chem. Res., 9 (1999) 445.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muegge, I. and Rarey, M. In Lipkowitz, K. B. and Boyd, D. B. (Eds.), Reviews in Computational Chemistry 17, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997, pp. 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeWitte, R. S., Ishchenko, A. V. and Shakhnovich, E. I., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119 (1997) 4608.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joseph-McCarthy, D., Hogle, J. M. and Karplus, M., Proteins, 29 (1997) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castro, A., Richards, W. G. and Lyne, P. D., Med. Chem. Res., 9 (1999) 98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burkhard, P., Hommel, U., Sanner, M. and Walkinshaw, M. D., J. Mol. Biol., 287 (1999) 853.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Otyepka, M., Krystof, V., Havlicek, L., Siglerova, V., Strnad, M. and Koca, J., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 2506.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schapira, M., Raaka, B. M., Samuels, H. H. and Abagyan, R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97 (2000) 1008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grueneberg, S., Wendt, B. and Klebe, G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 40 (2001) 389.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Good, A., Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev., 4 (2001) 301.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, Y., Ewing, T. J. A., Skillman, A. G. and Kuntz, I. D., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 12 (1998) 579.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rarey, M. and Lengauer, T., Persp. Drug Disc. Design, 20 (2000) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boehm, H.-J., Banner, D.W. and Weber, L., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 13 (1999) 51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kick, E. K., Roe, D. C., Skillman, A. G., Liu, G., Ewing, T. J. A., Sun, Y., Kuntz, I. D. and Ellman, J. A., Chem. Biol., 4 (1997) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grzybowski, B. A., Ishchenko, A. V., Kim, C.-Y., Topalov, G., Chapman, R., Christianson, D. W., Whitesides, G. M. and Shakhnovich, E. I., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99 (2002) 1270.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hubbard, R. E., Curr. Opin. Biotechnology, 8 (1997) 696.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kubinyi, H., Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev., 1 (1998) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hicks, S., Assefa, H. and Sindelar, R., Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev., 2 (1999) 223.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murcko, M. A., Caron, P. R. and Charifson, P. S., Annu. Reports Med. Chem., 34 (1999) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Lucca, G. V. and Lam, P. Y. S., Drugs Future, 23 (1998) 987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. von Itzstein, M., Wu, W.-Y., Kok, G. B., Pegg, M. S., Dyason, J. C., Jin, B., Phan, T. V., Smythe, M. L., White, H. F., Oliver, S. W., Colmant, P. M., Varghese, J. N., Ryan, D. M., Woods, J. M., Bethell, R. C., Hotham, V. J., Cameron, J. M. and Penn, C. R., Nature, 363 (1993) 418.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Babu, Y. S., Chand, P., Bantia, S., Kotian, P., Dehghani, A., El-Kattan, Y., Lin, T.-H., Hutchinson, T. L., Elliott, A. J., Parker, C. D., Ananth, S. L., Horn, L. L., Larver, G. W. and Montgomery, J. A., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 3482.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, G. T., Chen, Y., Wang, S., Gentles, R., Sowin, T., Kati, W., Muchmore, S., Giranda, V., Stewart, K., Sham, H., Kempf, D. and Laver, W. G., J. Med. Chem., 44 (2001) 1192.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chand, P., Kotian, P. L., Deghani, A., El-Kattan, Y., Lin, T.-H., Hutchinson, T. L., Babu, Y. S., Bantia, S., Elliott, A. J. and Montgomery, J. A., J. Med. Chem., 44 (2001) 4379.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boyd, D. B., Rational Molecular Design in Drug Research, In Liljefors, T., Jorgensen, F. S. and Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. (Eds.), Alfred Benzon Symposium 42, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bailey, D. and Brown, D., Drug Discovery Today, 6 (2001) 57.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bohacek, R. S. and McMartin, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116 (1994) 5560.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Leach, A., Bryce, R. A. and Robinson, A. J., J. Mol. Graphics Mod., 18 (2000) 358.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Todorov, N. P. and Dean, P. M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 11 (1997) 175.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Todorov, N. P. and Dean, P. M., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 12 (1998) 335.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garland, S. L., New computational tools for the design of peptidomimetics, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1996.

  36. Carter, J. S., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 8 (1997) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kalgutkar, A. S., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 9 (1999) 831.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Talley, J. J., Prog. Med. Chem., 36 (1999) 201.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Carter, J. S., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 10 (2000) 1011.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dannhardt, G. and Laufer, S., Curr. Med. Chem., 7 (2000) 1101.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Puig, C., Crespo, M., Godesart, N., Feixas, J., Ibarzo, J., Jimenéz, J.-M., Soca, L., Cardelius, I., Heredia, A., Miralpeix, M., Puig, J., Beleta, J., Huerta, J. M., López, M., Segarra, V., Ryder, H. and Palacios, J. M., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 214.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Feixas, J., Jimenéz, J.-M., Godessart, N., Puig, C., Soca, L. and Crespo, M. I., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 11 (2001) 2687.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bosch, J., Roca, T., Catena, J.-L., Llorens, O., Pérez, J.-J., Lagunas, C., Fernandez, A. G., Miquel, I., Fernandez-Serrat, A. and Farrerons, C., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 10 (2000) 1745.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Khanna, I. K., Yu, Y., Huff, R. M., Weier, R. M., Xu, X., Koszyk, F. J., Collins, P. W., Cogburn, J. N., Isakson, P. C., Koboldt, C. M., Masferrer, J. L., Perkins, W. E., Seibert, K., Veenhuizen, A. W., Yuan, J., Yang, D.-C. and Zhang, Y. Y., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 3168.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Magarian, R.vA., Overacre, L. B., Singh, S. and Meyer, K. L., Curr. Med. Chem., 1 (1994) 61.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Coghlan, M. J. and Kort, M. E., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 9 (1999) 1523.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gegnas, L. D., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 10 (2000) 833.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sippl, W., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 14 (2000) 559.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Grese, T. A., Pennington, L. D., Sluka, J. P., Adrian, M. D., Cole, H. W., Fuson, T. R., Magee, D. E., Phillips, D. L., Rowley, E. R., Shetler, P. K., Short, L. L., Venugopalan, M., Yang, M. N., Sato, M., Glasebrook, A. L. and Bryant, H. U., J. Med. Chem., 41 (1998) 1272.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fink, B. E., Mortensen, D. S., Stauffer,S. R., Zachary, D. A. and Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Chem. Biol., 6 (1999) 205.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kim, S.-H. and Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Bioorg. Med. Chem., 8 (2000) 785.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stauffer, S. R., Coletta, C. J., Tedesco, R., Nishiguchi, G., Carlson, K., Sun, J., Katzenellenbogen, B. S. and Katzenellenbogen, J. A., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 4934.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tedesco, R., Youngman, M. K., Wilson, S. R. and Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 11 (2001) 1281.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rosania, G. R. and Chang, Y.-T., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 10 (2000) 215.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sielecki, T. M., Boylan, J. F., Benfield, P. A. and Trainor, G. L., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dumas, J., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 11 (2001) 405.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schultz, C., Link, A., Leost, M., Zaharevitz, D.W., Gussio R., Sausville, E. A., Meijer, L. and Kunick, C., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 2909.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Barvian, M., Boschelli, D. H., Cossrow, J., Dobrusin, E., Fattaey, A., Fritsch, A., Fry, D., Harvey, P., Keller, P., Garrett, M., La, F., Leopold, W., McNamara, D., Quin, M., Trump-Kallmeyer, S., Toogood, P., Wu, Z. and Zhang, E., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 4606.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Furet, P., Zimmermann, J., Capraro, H.-G., Meyer, T. and Imbach, P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 14 (2000) 403.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nugiel, D. A., Etzkorn, A.-M., Vidwans, A., Benfield, P. A., Boisclair, M., Burton, C., Cox, S., Czerniak, P. M., Doleniak, D. and Seitz, S. P., J. Med. Chem., 44 (2001) 1334.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sielecki, T. M., Johnson, T. L., Liu, J., Muckelbauer, J. K., Grafstrom, R. H., Cox, S., Boylan, J., Burton, C. R., Chen, H., Smallwood, A., Chang, C.-H., Boisclair, M., Benfield, P. A., Trainor, G. L. and Seitz, S. P., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 11 (2001) 1157.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Babine, R. E. and Bender, S. L., Chem. Rev., 97 (1997) 1359.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Whittaker, M., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2 (1998) 386.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Beckett, R. P. and Whittaker, M., Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents, 8 (1998) 259.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Skiles, J. W., Gonnella, N. C. and Jeng, A. Y., Curr. Med. Chem. (2001) 425.

  66. Song, Y., Connor, D. T., Sercel, A. D., Sorenson,R. J., Doubleday,R., Unangst, P. C., Roth, B. D., Beylin, V. G., Gilbertsen, R. B., Chan, K., Schrier, D. J., Guglietta, A., Bornemeier, D. A. and Dyer, R. D., J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 1161.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zhu, J., Yu, H., Fan, H., Liu, H. and Shi, Y., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 15 (2001) 447.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Meyer, E. F., Botos, I., Scapozza, L. and Zhang, D., Persp. Drug Disc. Design, 3 (1995) 168.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Boehm, H.-J., Boehringer, M., Bur, D., Gmuender, H., Huber, W., Klaus, W., Kostrewa, D., Kuehne, H., Luebbers, T., Meunier-Keller, N. and Mueller, F., J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 2664.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Borkakoti, N., Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev., 2 (1999) 449.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.

  72. Moloc: Gerber Molecular Design, 2002, www.moloc.ch.

  73. Gerber, P. R. and Müller, K., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design, 9 (1995) 251.

    Google Scholar 

  74. World Drug Index, Derwent Information, 1996.

  75. Bracewell, R. N. The Fourier transform and its applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999.

  76. Goodford, P. J., J. Med. Chem., 28 (1985) 849.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Garey, M. and Johnson, D. Computers and Intractability-A guide to the theory of NP-Completeness, Freeman, San Francisco, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stahl, M., Todorov, N.P., James, T. et al. A validation study on the practical use of automated de novo design. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16, 459–478 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021242018286

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021242018286

Navigation