Skip to main content
Log in

Modular Reconfigurable Robots in Space Applications

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robots used for tasks in space have strict requirements. Modular reconfigurable robots have a variety of attributes that are well suited to these conditions, including: serving as many different tools at once (saving weight), packing into compressed forms (saving space) and having high levels of redundancy (increasing robustness). In addition, self-reconfigurable systems can self-repair and adapt to changing or unanticipated conditions. This paper will describe such a self-reconfigurable modular robot: PolyBot. PolyBot has significant potential in the space manipulation and surface mobility class of applications for space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, S.K., Kissner, L., and Yim, M. 2001. Joint solutions of many degrees-of-freedom systems using dextrous workspaces. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation.

  • Bickler, B. 1992. A new family of JPL planetary surface vehicles. In Proc. Missions, Technologies, and Design of Planetary Mobile Vehicle, Toulouse, France.

  • Casal, A. 2002. Reconfiguration planning for modular selfreconfigurable robots. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Aero/Astro. Stanford University.

  • Chirikjian, G.S. and Burdick, J.W. 1992. Geometric approach to hyper-redundant manipulator obstacle avoidance. J. of Mechanical Design-Transactions of the ASME, 114(4):580–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farritor, S. and Dubowsky, S. 2001. On modular design of field robotic systems. Autonomous Robots, 10(1):57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromherz, M.P.J., Hoeberechts, M., and Jackson, W.B. 1999. Towards constraint-based actuation allocation for hyper-redundant manipulators. In CP'99 Workshop on Constraints in Control (CC'99), Alexandria, VA.

  • Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R. and Vlissides, J. 1995. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series.

  • Hayati, S. et al. 1996. Microrover research for exploration of Mars. In Proc. of the AIAA Forum on Advanced Developments in Space Robotics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iagnemma, K. and Dubowsky, S. 2000. Mobile robot rough-terrain control (RTC) For planetary exploration. In Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Baltimore, MD.

  • Jones, J.A. 2000. Inflatable rover demonstration. In video Proc of IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, (ICRA) San Francisco, CA.

  • Murata, S., Kurokawa, H., and Kokaji, S. 1994. Self-assembling, machine. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 441–448.

  • NASA. 1998. Human exploration of Mars: The reference mission (Version 3.0 with June, 1998 Addendum) of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team. Exploration Office, Advanced Development Office, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamecha, A., Chiang, C., Stein, D., and Chirikjian, G. 19996. Design and implementation of metamorphic robots. In ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference-Computers and Engineering, Irvine, CA.

  • Roufas, K., Zhang, Y., Duff, D., and Yim, M. 2000. Six degree of freedom sensing for docking using IR LED emitters and receivers. In Int. Symp. for Experimental Robotics 2000 (ISER) Honolulu Hawaii.

  • Rus, D. and Vona, M. 1999. Self-reconfiguration planning with compressible unit modules. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2513–2520.

  • Schenker, P.S. et al. 2000. Reconfigurable robots for all terrain exploration. In SPIE, Sensor Fusion and Decentralized control in Robotic Systems III, Vol. 4196.

  • Smalley, E. 2000. NASA gets snake robot off the ground. Technology Research News [online news magazine] http://www.trnmag.com/Stories/101100/Snake_Robot_101100.htm.

  • Space Studies Board, National Research Council, (SSB, NRC). (1999). A scientific rationale for mobility in planetary environments, National Academy Press.

  • Sreenivasan, S. and Wilcox, B. 1994. Stability and tractino control of an actively actuated micro-rover. Journal of Robotic Systems, 11(6):487–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsal, C., Killiccote, H., and Khosla, P. 2001. A modular selfreconfigurable bipartite robotic system: Implementation and motion planning. Autonomous Robots, 10(1):23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, P., Castano, A., and Shen, W.-M. 1999. Robot modularity for self-reconfiguration. In SPIE Int. Simp. on Intelligent Sys. and Advanced Manufacturing, Proc. Vol. 3839, pp. 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yangsheng, Xu and Ben, Brown. 1994. A space station robot walker and its shared-control software. In Proc of the AIAA/ NASA Conference on Intelligent Robots, Houston, TX, Vol. 1, pp. 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, M. 1993. A reconfigurable modular robot with many modes of locomotion. In Proc. JSME Int. Conf. on Advanced Mechatronics, pp. 283–288

  • Yim, M., Duff, D., and Roufas, K. 2000. PolyBot: A modular recon-figurable robot. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation.

  • Yim, M., Duff, D., and Zhang, Y. 2001. Closed chain motion with large mechanical advantage. In Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

  • Yim, M., Goldberg, D., and Casal, A. 2000. Connectivity planning for closed-chain reconfiguration. In SPIE, Sensor Fusion and Decentralized Control in Robotic Systems III, Vol. 4196.

  • Yim, M., Homans, S., and Roufas, K. 2001. Climbing with snake-like robots. In Proc. of the IFAC Workshop on Mobile Robot Technology, Jejudo, Korea.

  • Yim, M., Reich, J., and Berlin, A.A. 2000. Two approaches to distributed manipulation.” In Distributed Manipulation. H. Choset, K. Borhinger (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishing: Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, M., Zhang, Y., Lamping, J., and Mao, E. 2001. Distributed control for 3-D metamorphosis. Autonomous Robots, 10(1):41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Roufas, K.D., and Yim, M. 2001. Software architecture for modular self-reconfigurable robots. In Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yim, M., Roufas, K., Duff, D. et al. Modular Reconfigurable Robots in Space Applications. Autonomous Robots 14, 225–237 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022287820808

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022287820808

Navigation