Skip to main content
Log in

Citation patterns in the Kuwaiti journal Medical Principles and Practice: The first 12 years, 1989-2000

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the citation patterns in the journal, Medical Principles and Practice from its inception in 1989 through 2000 (volumes 1-9). The data set includes 4740 references appended to the 221 original research articles. All of the citations were entered into a ProCite database for analysis. Specifically, this study addresses: (1) bibliometric patterns of cited works in terms of publication format, subject scatter, authorship characteristics, age of citations, geographic distribution, and language distribution; (2) productivity of journal titles; (3) the role of self-citation; and (4) how selected bibliometric indicators apply. Some of the findings include: journal articles are most frequently cited; English language publications dominate the literature; there is a trend of multiple authorship; and the pattern of aging is below the norm for medical literature. The results of the study can provide a benchmark to measure the user behavior of a particular group of researchers as well as for the provision of collection development and management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. J. HUTH, Mapping the land of medical journals: Some new applications for citation data from Science Citation Index, In: S. P. LOCK (Ed.), The Future of Medical Journals: In Commemoration of 150 Years of the British Medical Journal, British Medical Journal, London, 1991, pp. 81-93.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. W. HAFNER, Citation characteristics of physiology literature, 1970-72, International Library Review, 7 (1975) 85-115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. C. AZIAGBA, Scientific journal selection based on the study of a local journal, Information Processing and Management, 29 (1) (1993) 83-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. M. HURD, D. B. BLECIC, R. VISHWANATHAM, Information use by molecular biologists: Implications for library collections and services, College & Research Libraries, 60 (10) (1999) 31-43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. LASCAR, L. D. MENDELSOHN, An analysis of journal use by structural biologists with applications for journal collection development decisions, College & Research Libraries, 62 (5) (2001) 422-433.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. DEVIN, M. KELLOGG, The serial/monograph ratio in research libraries: Budgeting in light of citation studies, College & Research Libraries, 45 (1) (1990) 46-54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. BURDICK, A. BUTLER, M.G. SULLIVAN, Citation patterns in the health sciences: Implications for serials/monographic fund allocation, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 81(1) (1993) 44-47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. THORPE, An evaluation of the rheumatology periodical literature used in Britain and the USA, Methods of Information in Medicine, 11 (2) (1972) 119-121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. W. BRENNEN, W. P. DAVEY, Citation analysis in the literature of tropical medicine, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 66 (1) (1978) 24-30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. A. WINDSOR, D. M. WINDSOR, Citation of the literature by information scientists in their own publications, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (5) (1973) 377-381.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. J. DE SOLLA PRICE, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, and nonscience, In: C. E. NELSON, D. K. POLLOCK (Eds), Communications among Scientists and Engineers, D. C. Health and Company, Lexington, MA, 1970, pp. 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. HOLT, R. SIEBERS, A. SUDER, R. LOAN, O. JEFFERY, The accuracy of references in Australian and New Zealand medical journals, N Z Medical Journal, 113 (1119) (2000) 416-417.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. M. GEORGE, K. ROBBINS, Reference accuracy in the dermatologic literature, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 31 (1) (1994) 61-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. T. EVANS, H. I. NADJARI, S. A. BURCHELL, Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals: A continuing peer review problem, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263 (10) (1990) 1353-1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. EICHORN, A. YANKAUER, Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals, American Journal of Public Health, 77 (8) (1987) 1011-1012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. D. MENDELSOHN An analysis of journal use by structural biologists with applications for journal collection development decisions, College & Research Libraries, 62 (5) (2001) Ref. 5, p. 430.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. B. BLECIC, R.VISHWANATHAM, Information use by molecular biologists: Implications for library collections and services, College & Research Libraries, 60 (10) (1999) Ref. 4, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. WALCOTT, Local citation studies-A shortcut to local knowledge, Science & Technology Libraries, 14 (3) (1994) 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Institute for Scientific Information. (2000). SCI Science Citation Index 1999: Guide and List of Source Publications. Philadelphia, PA: ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ref. 2, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. J. COX, I. WESSEL, G. R. NORTON, R. P. SWINSON, Citation patterns in anxiety disorders research in 14 journals: 1990-1991, American Journal of Psychiatry, 151 (6) (1994) 933-936.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. A. WAHEED, England and US corner journal market, Nature, 405 (6787) (2000) 613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ref. 2, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al-Qallaf, C.L. Citation patterns in the Kuwaiti journal Medical Principles and Practice: The first 12 years, 1989-2000. Scientometrics 56, 369–382 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022330920925

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022330920925

Keywords

Navigation