Skip to main content
Log in

Destination Driven Motion Planning via Obstacle Motion Prediction and Multi-State Path Repair

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a real-time navigating system named Destination Driven Navigator for a mobile robot operating in unstructured static and dynamic environments. We have designed a new obstacle representation method named Cross-Line Obstacle Representation and a new concept “work space” to reduce the robot's search space and the environment storage cost, an Adapted Regression Model to predict dynamic obstacles' motion, Multi-State Path Repair rules to quickly translate an infeasible path into feasible one, and the path-planning algorithm to generate a path. A high-level Destination Driven Navigator uses these methods, models and algorithms to guide a mobile robot traveling in various environments while avoiding static and dynamic obstacles. A group of experiments has been conducted. The results exhibit that the Destination Driven Navigator is a powerful and effective paradigm for robot motion planning and obstacle avoidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borenstein, J. and Koren, Y.: The vector field histogram - fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 7(3) (1991), 278-288.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brock, O. and Khatib, O.: High-speed navigation using the global dynamic window approach, in: Proc. of the IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1999, pp. 341-346.

  3. Chang, C. and Song, K.: Dynamic motion planning based on real-time obstacle prediction, in: Proc. of the IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1996, pp. 2402-2407.

  4. Davis, I. L. and Stentz, A.: Sensor fusion for autonomous outdoor navigation using a networks, in: Proc. of the IEEE Internat. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995.

  5. Dozier, G., Esterline, A., Homaifar, A., and Bikdash, M.: Hybrid evolutionary path planning via visibility-based repair, in: Proc. of the 35th Anuual ACM Southeast Conf., 1997, pp. 507-511.

  6. Han, K. and Veloso, M.: Physical model-based multi-objects tracking and prediction in robosocce, Working note in: The AAAI 1997 Fall Symposium, AAAI, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, D., Burgard, W., and Thrun, S.: The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance, IEEE Robotics Automat. Mag. 4(1) (1997), 23-33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fox, D., Burgard, W., and Thrun, S.: A hybrid collision avoidance method for mobile robots, in: Proc. of the IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1998, pp. 1238-1243.

  9. Fujimura, K.: Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments, Springer, Tokyo, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalman, R.: A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problem, J. Basic Engrg. (1960), 35-45.

  11. Kambhamoati, C., Garces, F., and Warwick, K.: Approximation of non-autonomous dynamic systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks, in: Proc. of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS Internat. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, 2000.

  12. Khatib, O. and Chatila, R.: Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots, Internat. J. Robotics Res. 5(1) (1986), 90-98.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koren, Y. and Borenstein, J.: Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation, in: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1991.

  14. Luo, R. and Chen, T.: Target tracking by grey prediction theory and look-ahead fuzzy logic control, in: Proc. of the IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1999, pp. 1176-1181.

  15. Nelson, H. and Yung, C.: An intelligent mobile vehicle navigator based on fuzzy logic and reinforcement learning, IEEE Trans. System Man Cybernet. Part B: Cybernetics 29(3) (1999), 314-321.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sen, A. and Srivastava, M.: Regression Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, Springer, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simmons, R.: The curvature-velocity method for local obstacle avoidance, in: Proc. of the IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4, 1996, pp. 2275-2282.

    Google Scholar 

  18. URISA, Glossary of Terms, Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, http:// www.urisa.org/glossary.htm (2000).

  19. Wang, L. and Tsai, W.: Collision avoidance by a modified least-mean-square-error classification scheme for indoor autonomous land vehicle navigation, J. Robotics Systems 8 (1991), 677-698.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, H., Chi, C., and Masley, M.: Integrating cross-line representation and repair rules into robot path planning, in: Proc. of the IASTED Internat. Conf. on Control and Applications, 1999, pp. 555-559.

  21. Yu, H. and Malik, R.: Aimy - an autonomous mobile robot navigation in an unknown environment with infrared detector system, J. Intelligent Robotic Systems (1995).

  22. Yung, N. and Ye, C.: Avoidance of moving obstacles through behavior fusion and motion prediction, in: IEEE Internat. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998, pp. 3424-3429.

  23. Zhu, Q.: Hidden Markov model for dynamic obstacle avoidance of mobile robot navigation, IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat. 7(3) (1991), 390-396.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, H., Su, T. Destination Driven Motion Planning via Obstacle Motion Prediction and Multi-State Path Repair. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 36, 149–173 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022668100590

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022668100590

Navigation