Abstract
My purpose in this essay is to clarify the notion of explanation by computer simulation in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. My contention is that computer simulation may be understood as providing two different kinds of explanation, which makes the notion of explanation by computer simulation ambiguous. In order to show this, I shall draw a distinction between two possible ways of understanding the notion of simulation, depending on how one views the relation in which a computing system that performs a cognitive task stands to the program that the system runs while performing that task. Next, I shall suggest that the kind of explanation that results from simulation is radically different in each case. In order to illustrate the difference, I will point out some prima facie methodological difficulties that need to be addressed in order to ensure that simulation plays a legitimate explanatory role in cognitive science, and I shall emphasize how those difficulties are very different depending on the notion of explanation involved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carroll, L. (1995), 'What the Tortoise Said to Achilles', Mind 104(416), pp. 691–693.
Cummings, R. (1977), 'Programs in the Explanation of Behavior', Philosophy of Science 44, pp. 269–287.
Cummings, R. (1975), 'Functional Analysis', Journal of Philosophy 72 (Nov. 20), pp. 741–765.
Chalmers, D. (1996), 'Does a Rock Implement Every Finite-State Automaton?', Synthese 108 (Sept. 3), pp. 309–333.
Chalmers, D. (1995), 'On Implementing a Computation', Minds and Machines 4, pp. 391–402.
Chomsky, N. (1980a), Rules and Representations, New York: Columbia University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1980b), 'Rules and Representations', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 1–61.
Chomsky, N. (1969), 'Comments on Harman's Reply', in S. Hook, ed., Language and Philosophy, New York: New York University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dretske, F. (1981), Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J.A. (1969), Psychological Explanation, New York: Random House.
Fodor, J.A. (1981), 'The Mind-Body Problem', Scientific American 1, pp. 114–123.
Fodor, J.A. (1975), The Language of Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fodor, J.A., Bever, T., and Garrett M. (1974), The Psychology of Language: An introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kim, J. and Sosa, E. eds. (1999), Metaphysics: An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell.
Marr, D. (1982), Vision, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Pippenger, N. and Fischer, M.J. (1979), 'Relations Among Complex Measures', Journal of the ACM 26, pp. 361–81.
Schnorr, C.P. (1976), 'The Network Complexity and Turing Machine Complexity of Finite Functions', Acta Informatica 7, pp. 95–107.
Searle, J. (1990), 'Is the Brain a Digital Computer?', Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64, pp. 21–37.
Searle, J. (1980), 'Rules and Causation', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 37–38.
Stabler, E. (1983), 'How are Grammars Represented?', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, pp. 391–421.
Simon, H.A. (1992), 'What is an Explanation of Behavior?', Psychological Science 3, pp. 150–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernández, J. Explanation by Computer Simulation in Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 13, 269–284 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022941621273
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022941621273