Skip to main content
Log in

On Dynamically Presenting a Topology Course

  • Published:
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Authors of traditional mathematical texts often have difficulty balancing the amount of contextual information and proof detail. We propose a simple hypermedia framework that can assist in the organisation and presentation of mathematical theorems and definitions. We describe the application of the framework to convert an existing course in general topology to a web-based set of materials. Two user evaluations of the materials indicated both successful and unsuccessful aspects of the framework. We discuss further lines of investigation, in particular, the presentation of larger bodies of work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Asperti, L. Padovani, C. Sacerdoti Coen, F. Guidi and I. Schena, Mathematical knowledge management in HELM, in: First International Workshop on Mathematical Knowledge Management (2001).

  2. T. Bray, J. Paoli, C.M. Sperberg-McQueen and E. Maler (eds.), Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, 2nd edn., W3C Recommendation (October 2000), http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.

  3. J. Brooke, SUS – a quick and dirty usability scale, http://www.usability.serco.com/trump/methods/satisfaction.htm.

  4. J. Clark (ed.), XSL Transformations 1.0, W3C Recommendation (November 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.

  5. D. Flanagan, JavaScript: The Definitive Guide, 3rd edn. (O'Reilly, 1998).

  6. M. Goossens and S. Rahtz, The LAT EXWeb Companion (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Grundy, A browsable format for proof presentation, Math. Universalis 2 (1996), http://www.ant.pl/MathUniversalis/2/grundy/mu.html.

  8. D. Knuth, Surreal Numbers (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kohlhase, OMDOC: An Open Markup Format for Mathematical Documents, SEKI Report SRSR–00–02, Universität Des Saarlandes (2000).

  10. I. Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery (Cambridge University Press, 1976).

  11. L. Lamport, How to write a proof, American Mathematical Monthly 102(7) (1994) 600–608.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Lamport, How LATEX changed the face of Mathematics: an E-interview with Leslie Lamport, www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/fanis/lamport-latex-interview.ps.

  13. Mathematical Reviews, American Mathematical Society, www.ams.org/mr-database.

  14. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering (Academic Press, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.C. Paulson and K. Grabczewski, Mechanizing set theory, Journal of Automated Reasoning 17 (1996) 291–323.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Pólya, How to Solve It (Penguin Books, 1990).

  17. G. Pólya, Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education (Routledge, 1992).

  19. M.E. Rudin, Nikiel's conjecture, Topology and its Applications 116 (2001) 305–331.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Russell, The study of mathematics, in: Mysticism and Logic (Penguin, 1953).

  21. S. Singh, Fermat's Last Theorem (Fourth Estate, 1998).

  22. W.A. Sutherland, Introduction to Metric and Topological Spaces (Oxford University Press, 1985).

  23. Y.L. Theng and H. Thimbleby, Addressing design and usability issues in hypertext and on the World Wide Web by re-examining the ‘lost in hyperspace’ problem, Journal of Universal Computer Science 4(11) (1998) 839–855.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cairns, P., Gow, J. & Collins, P. On Dynamically Presenting a Topology Course. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 38, 91–104 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022963714083

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022963714083

Navigation