Abstract
While information structure has traditionally been viewed as a singlepartition of information within an utterance, there are opposing viewsthat identify multiple such partitions in an utterance. The existenceof alternative proposals raises questions about the notion ofinformation structure and also its relation to discoursestructure. Exploring various linguistic aspects, this paper supports thetraditional view by arguing that there is no information structure partition within a subordinate clause.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E., 1999, Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Harlow: Pearson Education.
Borschev, V. and B. H. Partee, B.H., 2001, “The Russian genitive of negation in existential sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered,” pp. 185–250 in Travaux de Cercle Linguistique de Prague, Vol. 4, E. Hajičová, P. Sgall, J. Hana, and T. Hoskovec, eds., Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Collins, P.C., 1991, Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English, London: Routledge.
Daneš, F., 1974, “Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text,”pp. 106–128 in Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, F. Daneš, ed., Prague: Academia and The Hague: Mouton.
de Swart, H., 1999, “Position and meaning: Time adverbials in context,” pp. 336–361 in Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives, P. Bosch and R.A. van der Sandt, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Delin, J., 1995, “Presupposition and shared knowledge in it-clefts,” Language and Cognitive Process 10, 97–120.
Erteschik-Shir, N., 1998, “The syntax-focus structure interface,” pp. 211–240 in Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 29: The Limits of Syntax, P.W. Culicover and L. McNally, eds., New York: Academic Press.
Firbas, J., 1964, “On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis,” Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1, 267–280.
Grosz, B.J. and Sidner, C.L., 1986, “Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse,” Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204.
Günthner, S., 1996, “From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions,” Pragmatics 6, 323–356.
Hajičová, E., 1984, “Presupposition and allegation revisited,” Journal of Pragmatics 8, 155–167.
Hajičová, E., Partee, B.H., and Sgall, P., 1998, Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripart Structures, and Semantic Content, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hajičová, E., Skoumalová, H., and Sgall, P., 1995, “An automatic procedure for topic-focus identification,” Computational Linguistics 21, 81–94.
Halliday, M.A.K., 1967, “Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part II),” Journal of Linguistics 3, 199–244.
Heim, I., 1982, “The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Hoffman, B., 1995, “The computational analysis of the syntax and interpretation of 'free' word order in Turkish,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Komagata, N., 2001, “Entangled information structure: Analysis of complex sentence structures,” pp. 53–66 in Proceedings of ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, I. Kruijff-Korbayová and M. Steedman, eds., Helsinki: ESSLLI.
Komagata, N.N., 1999, “A computational analysis of information structure using parallel expository texts in English and Japanese,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Kruijff-Korbayová, I. and Webber, B.L., 2001a, “Concession, implicature and alternative sets,” pp. 227–248 in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-4), Tilburg, January 2001, H. Bunt, I. van der Sluis, and E. Thijsse, eds., Tilburg: Tilburg University.
Kruijff-Korbayová, I. and Webber, B.L., 2001b, “Information structure and the semantics of 'otherwise',” pp. 67–83 in Proceedings of ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, I. Kruijff-Korbayová and M. Steedman, eds., Helsinki: ESSLLI.
Kuno, S., 1973, The Structure of the Japanese Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lambrecht, K., 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laver, J., 1994, Principles of Phonetics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S.C., 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, W. and Thompson, S., 1988, “Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization,” Text 8, 243–281.
Mathesius, V., 1975, A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis, edited by Josef Vachek, The Hague: Mouton.
Noda, H., 1996, WA-to GA (WA and GA), Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
Partee, B.H., 1996, “Allegation and local accommodation,” pp. 65–86 in Discourse and meaning: Papers in Honor of Eva Hajičová, B.H. Partee and P. Sgall, eds., Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prevost, S., 1995, “A semantics of contrast and information structure for specifying intonation in spoken language generation,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Prince, E.F., 1978, “A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in Discourse,” Language 54, 883–906.
Prince, E.F., 1984, “Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional analysis,” pp. 213–225 in Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 433: Discourses in Reading and Linguistics, S.J. White and V. Teller, eds., New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J., 1985, A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, London: Longman.
Ramsay, V., 1987, “The functional distribution of preposed and postposed 'if' and 'when' clauses in written discourse,” in Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, R.S. Tomlin, ed., Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rooth, M.E., 1985, “Association with focus,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., and Panevova, J., 1986, The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Steedman, M., 2000, “Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface,” Linguistic Inquiry 31, 649–689.
Vallduví, E., 1990, “The informational component,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Vallduví, E., 2001, “Fragments in information packaging,” pp. 15–16 in Proceedings of ESSLLI 2001 Workshop on Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, I. Kruijff-Korbayová and M. Steedman, eds., Helsinki: ESSLLI.
Vallduví, E. and Zacharski, R., 1993, “Accenting phenomena, association with focus, and the recursiveness of focus-ground,” pp. 683–702 in Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, P. Dekker and M. Stokhof, eds., Amsterdam: ILLC/University of Amsterdam.
Webber, B., 1991, “Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis,” Natural Language and Cognitive Process 6, 107–135.
Webber, B.L. and Joshi, A.K., 1998, “Anchoring a lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar for discourse,” pp. 86–92 in Proceedings of the Worskshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers (COLING-ACL 98), M. Stede, L.Wanner, and E. Hovy, eds., Montreal: ACL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Komagata, N. Information Structure in Subordinate and Subordinate-Like Clauses. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 301–318 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024158621568
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024158621568