This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Cooper, R. and Ginzburg, J., 2002, “Using dependent record types in clarification ellipsis,” pp. 45–52 in Proceedings of the sixth workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, J. Bos, M.E. Foster, and C. Matheson, eds., Edinburgh University.
Ginzburg, J., 1996a, “Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue,” in Logic, Language and Computation, Vol. 1, J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl, eds., Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Ginzburg, J., 1996b, “Interrogatives: Questions, facts and dialogue,” in The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin, ed., Oxford: Blackwell.
Ginzburg, J. and Cooper, R., 2001, “Resolving ellipsis in clarification, pp. 236–243 in Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse.
Kruijff-Korbayová, I., Ericsson, S., Rodríguez, K.J., and Karagjosova, E., 2003, “Producing contextually appropriate intonation in an information-state based dialogue system,” in Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Budapest, Hungary, April 12–17, ACL.
Lappin, S., ed., 1996, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.
Larsson, S., 2002, “Issue-based dialogue management,” Ph.D. Thesis, Göteborg University.
Seligman, J. and Westerståhl, D., eds., 1996 Logic, Language and Computation, Vol. 1, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, R. Afterword. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 369–374 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024199714724
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024199714724