Abstract
While collaboration is associated with higher article citation rates, a body of research has suggested that this is, in part, related to the access to a larger social network and the increased visibility of research this entails, rather than simply a reflection of greater quality. We examine the role of networks in article citation rates by investigating article publication by the nine New Zealand Government-owned Crown Research Institutes (CRIs), drawing on the Science Citation Index. We analyse an aggregate data set of all CRI publications with duplicates removed, and, in addition, investigate each CRI. We find that a greater number of authors, countries and institutions involved in co-publication increases expected citation rates, although there are some differences between the CRIs. However, the type of co-publication affects the expected citation rates. We discover a 'periphery effect' where greater levels of co-publication with domestic institutions decreases expected citation rates. We conclude that scientists working on the periphery looking to increase the visibility of their research should strive to link their research to the international research community, particularly through co-publication with international authors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldi S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63: 829–846.
Bureau of Industry Economics (1996), Australian Science. Performance from Published Papers. Report 96/3. Canberra, Australian Government Publishing Service.
Butler L., Bourke P., Biglia B. (1997), CSIRO: Profile of Basic Research. Canberra, Australian National University.
ISI (2001), Science in New Zealand. At web cite: <http://www.in-cites.com/countries/world-map.html>
ISI (2002), National Research Concentration. At web site: <http://www.in-cites.com/countries/world-map.html>
King G. (1989), Unifying Political Methodology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kraut R., Egido C. (1988), Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 26–28 September, Portland, Oregon.
Lawani S. M. (1986), Some bibliographic correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9: 13–25.
Martin B. R. (1996), The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36: 343–362.
MORST (Ministry of Science, Research and Technology) (2001), New Zealand Research and Development Statistics 1997–1998. at web site: < http://www.morst.govt.nz/publications/rdstats_98/gvmt.htm>
Narin F., Whitlow E. S. (1990), Measurement of Scientific Collaboration and Co-Authorship in CEC-related Areas of Science. Report EUR 14581, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Phelan T. J. (1999), A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45: 117–136.
STATACORP (2001), Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0, Reference H-P. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T. & DeRouen, K. Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics 57, 321–337 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025048516769
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025048516769