Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In silico prediction of drug toxicity

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is essential, in order to minimise expensive drug failures due to toxicity being found in late development or even in clinical trials, to determine potential toxicity problems as early as possible. In view of the large libraries of compounds now being handled by combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening, identification of putative toxicity is advisable even before synthesis. Thus the use of predictive toxicology is called for. A number of in silico approaches to toxicity prediction are discussed. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), relating mostly to specific chemical classes, have long been used for this purpose, and exist for a wide range of toxicity endpoints. However, QSARs also exist for the prediction of toxicity of very diverse libraries, although often such QSARs are of the classification type; that is, they predict simply whether or not a compound is toxic, and do not give an indication of the level of toxicity. Examples are given of all of these. A number of expert systems are available for toxicity prediction, most of them covering a range of toxicity endpoints. Those discussed include TOPKAT, CASE, DEREK, HazardExpert, OncoLogic and COMPACT. Comparative tests of the ability of these systems to predict carcinogenicity show that improvement is still needed. The consensus approach is recommended, whereby the results from several prediction systems are pooled. It is simply amazing that we can formulate any kind of QSAR. The (desired activity) is only the starting point. The truly formidable problem is that of toxicity, especially the difficult long-term toxicities resulting from chronic usage''. (Hansch & Leo [1])

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansch, C. and Leo, A., Exploring QSAR: Fundamentals and Applications in Chemistry and Biology, Amer. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy, T., Drug Disc. Today, 2 (1997) 436.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crum Brown, A. and Fraser, T.R., Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 25 (1868-69) 151.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansch, C., Maloney, P.P., Fujita, T. and Muir, R.M., Nature, 194 (1962) 178.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansch, C. and Clayton, J.M., J. Pharm. Sci., 62 (1973) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. King, L.A. and Moffat, A.C., Med. Sci. Law, 23 (1983) 193.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lien, E.J. and Tong, G.L., Cancer Chemother. Rep., 57 1973)

  8. Jarzebski, A., Falkowski, L. and Borowski, E., J. Antibiot. 35 (1982) 220.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P., Cheng, P.T.W., Alam, M., Beyer, B.D., Bisacchi, G.S., Dejneka, T., Evans, A.J., Greytok, J.A., Hermsmeier, M.A., Humphreys, W.G., Jacobs, G.A., Kocy, O., Lin, P.-F., Lis, K.A., Marella, M.A., Ryono, D.E., Sheaffer, A.K., Spergel, S.H., Sun, C., Tino, J.A., Vite, G., Colonno, R.J., Zahler, R. and Barrish, J.C., J. Med. Chem., 39 (1996) 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schön, U., Antel, J., Brückner, R. and Messinger, J., Med. Chem., 41 (1998) 318.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dearden, J.C., Cronin, M.T.D. and Thomas, G.R., J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 51 (1999) Suppl., 267.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dearden, J.C., Cronin, M.T.D. and Shah, S. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 51 (1999) Suppl., 266.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansch, C., Bjorkroth, J.P. and Leo, A., J. Pharm. Sci., 76 (1987) 663.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, Y.C. and Hansch, C., J. Med. Chem., 14 (1971) 777.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mannhold, R. and Dross, K., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 15 (1996) 403.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dearden, J.C., Netzeva, T.I. and Bibby, R., J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 54 (2002) suppl., S–65.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dearden, J.C., Netzeva, T.I. and Bibby, R., J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 54 (2002) suppl., S–66.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Benigni, R. and Giuliani, A., Med. Res. Rev., 16 (1996) 267.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dearden, J.C., Cronin, M.T.D., Patel, H. and Raevsky, O.A., J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 52 (2000) Suppl., 221.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dearden, J.C. and Scott, A.C., J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 54 (2002) Suppl., S–66.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mumtaz, M.M., Knauf, L.A., Reisman, D.J., Peirano, W.B., Derosa, C.T., Gombar, V.K., Enslein, K., Carter, J.R., Blake, B.W., Huque, K.I. and Ramanujam, V.M.S., Toxicol. Lett., 79 (1995) 131.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barratt, M.D., ATLA, 23 (1995) 111.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gao, H., Williams, C.M., Labute, P. and Bajorath, J., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 164.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dearden, J.C. and Cronin, M.T.D., In Peijnenburg, W.J.G.M. and Damborský, J. (Eds.) Biodegradability Prediction, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 93-104.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dearden, J.C., Barratt, M.D., Benigni, R., Bristol, D.W., Combes, R.D., Cronin, M.T.D., Judson, P.N., Payne, M.P., Richard, A.M., Tichý, M., Worth, A.P. and Yourick, J.J., ATLA, 25 (1997) 223.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Benfenati, E. and Gini, G., Toxicol., 119 (1997) 213.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richard, A.M., Knowledge Eng. Rev., 14 (1999) 307.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Helma, C., Gottmann, E. and Kramer, S., Stat. Methods Med. Res., 9 (2000) 329.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Greene, N., Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 54 (2002) 417.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Enslein, K., Gombar, V.K. and Blake, B.W., Mut. Res., 305 (1994) 47.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Enslein, K., Gombar, V.K., Blake, B.W., Maibach, H.I., Hostynek, J.J., Sigman, C.C. and Bagheri, D., Food Chem. Toxicol., 35 (1997) 1091.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rosenkranz, H.S., Cunningham, A.R., Zhang, Y.P., Claycamp, H.G., Macina, O.T., Sussman, N.B., Grant, S.G. and Klopman, G., SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 10 (1999) 277.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cunningham, A.R., Klopman, G. and Rosenkranz, H.S., Mut. Res. - Fund. Mol. Mech. Mut., 405 (1998) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gomez, J., Macina, O.T., Mattison, D.R., Zhang, Y.P., Klopman, G. and Rosenkranz, H.S., Teratol., 60 (1999) 190.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Matthews, E.J. and Contrera, J.F., Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 28 (1998) 242.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Greene, N., Judson, P.N., Langowski, J.J. and Marchant, C.A., SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 10 (1999) 299.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Steger-Hartmann, T., Yih, T.D., Marchant, C.A. and Langowski, J.J., Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol., 363 (2001) Suppl., S–363.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Barratt, M.D., Castell, J.V., Miranda, M.A. and Langowski, J.J., J. Photochem. Photobiol. B - Biol., 58 (2000) 54.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Smithing, M.P. and Darvas, F., In Finlay, J.W., Robinson, S.F. and Armstrong, D.J., (Eds.) Food Safety Assessment (American Chemical Society Symposium Series No. 484), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 191-200.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brown, S.J., Raja, A.A. and Lewis, D.F.V., ATLA, 22 (1994) 482.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Woo, Y.-T., Lai, D., Argus, M. and Arcos, J., Toxicol. Lett., 79 (1995) 219.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Purdy, R., Environ. Health Perspect., 104 (1996) 1085.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Parke, D.V., Ioannides, C. and Lewis, D.F.V., ATLA, 18 (1990) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lewis, D.F.V., Ioannides, C. and Parke, D.V., Drug Metab. Rev., 30 (1998) 709.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lewis, D.F.V., J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., 76 (2001) 237.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lewis, D.F.V., Ioannides, C. and Parke, D.V., Mut. Res., 291 (1993) 61.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Richard, A.M., Mut. Res. - Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen., 400 (1998) 493.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lewis, D.F.V., Bird, M.G. and Jacobs, M.N., Human Exper. Toxicol., 21 (2002) 115.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Benigni, R., Mut. Res. - Environ. Muta., 334 (1995) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Richard, A.M. and Benigni, R., SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 13 (2002) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Benigni, R., Mut. Res. - Rev. Mut. Res., 387 (1997) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Leo, A., Panthananickal, A. and Hansch, C., J. Med. Chem., 24 (1981) 859.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Topliss, J.G. and Costello, R.J., J. Med. Chem., 15 (1972) 1066.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Dunn, W.J. and Wold, S., J. Med. Chem., 21 (1978) 1001.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rippmann, F., Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 9 (1990) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Benigni, R., Giuliani, A., Franke, R. and Gruska, A., Chem. Rev., 100 (2000) 3697.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Benigni, R., Andreoli, C. and Giuliani, A., Carcinogenesis, 10 (1989) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jurs, P.C., Chou, J.T. and Yuan, M, J. Med. Chem., 22 (1979) 476.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gini, G., Lorenzini, M., Benfenati, E., Grasso, P. and Bruschi, M., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39 (1999) 1076.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, L.T., Sannes, K., Shusterman, A.J. and Hansch, C., Chem.-Biol. Interact., 81 (1992) 149.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Blake, B.W., Enslein, K., Gombar, V.K. and Borgstedt, H.H., Mut. Res., 241 (1990) 261.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Moriguchi, I., Hirano, H. and Hirono, S., Environ. Health Perspect., 104 (1996) 1051.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Pharmacy and Chemistry, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, England

    John C. Dearden

Authors
  1. John C. Dearden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dearden, J.C. In silico prediction of drug toxicity. J Comput Aided Mol Des 17, 119–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025361621494

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025361621494

Keywords

Search

Navigation