Skip to main content
Log in

Multidomain WENO Finite Difference Method with Interpolation at Subdomain Interfaces

  • Published:
Journal of Scientific Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High order finite difference WENO methods have the advantage of simpler coding and smaller computational cost for multi-dimensional problems, compared with finite volume WENO methods of the same order of accuracy. However a main restriction is that conservative finite difference methods of third and higher order of accuracy can only be used on uniform rectangular or smooth curvilinear meshes. In order to overcome this difficulty, in this paper we develop a multidomain high order WENO finite difference method which uses an interpolation procedure at the subdomain interfaces. A simple Lagrange interpolation procedure is implemented and compared to a WENO interpolation procedure. Extensive numerical examples are shown to indicate the effectiveness of each procedure, including the measurement of conservation errors, orders of accuracy, essentially non-oscillatory properties at the domain interfaces, and robustness for problems containing strong shocks and complex geometry. Our numerical experiments have shown that the simple and efficient Lagrange interpolation suffices for the subdomain interface treatment in the multidomain WENO finite difference method, to retain essential conservation, full high order of accuracy, essentially non-oscillatory properties at the domain interfaces even for strong shocks, and robustness for problems containing strong shocks and complex geometry. The method developed in this paper can be used to solve problems in relatively complex geometry at a much smaller CPU cost than the finite volume version of the same method for the same accuracy. The method can also be used for high order finite difference ENO schemes and an example is given to demonstrate a similar result as that for the WENO schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balsara, D., and Shu, C.-W. (2000). Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160, 405-452.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, M., and Colella, P. (1989). Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 82, 64-84.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casper, J., Shu, C.-W., and Atkins, H. L. (1994). Comparison of two formulations for high-order accurate essentially nonoscillatory schemes. AIAA J. 32, 1970-1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Del Zanna, L., Velli, M., and Londrillo, P. (1998). Dynamical response of a stellar atmosphere to pressure perturbations: Numerical simulations. Astron. Astrophys. 330, L13-L16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedrichs, O. (1998). Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for the interpolation of mean values on unstructured grids. J. Comput. Phys. 144, 194-212.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grasso, F., and Pirozzoli, S. (2000). Shock-wave-vortex interactions: Shock and vortex deformations, and sound production. Theor. Comp. Fluid Dyn. 13, 421-456.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grasso, F., and Pirozzoli, S. (2000). Shock wave-thermal inhomogeneity interactions: Analysis and numerical simulations of sound generation. Phys. Fluids 12, 205-219.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., and Chakravarthy, S. (1987). Uniformly high order essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71, 231-303.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, C., and Shu, C.-W. (1999). Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 150, 97-127.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, G., and Peng, D.-P. (2000). Weighted ENO schemes for Hamilton–Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 2126-2143.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, G., and Shu, C.-W. (1996). Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202-228.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, G., and Wu, C.-C. (1999). A high order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 150, 561-594.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Veque, R. J. (1990). Numerical Solutions for Conservation Laws, Birkhäuser Verlag.

  14. Liang, S., and Chen, H. (1999). Numerical simulation of underwater blast-wave focusing using a high-order scheme. AIAA J. 37, 1010-1013.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liska, R., and Wendroff, B. (1998). Composite schemes for conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35, 2250-2271.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liska, R., and Wendroff, B. (1999). Two-dimensional shallow water equations by composite schemes. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 30, 461-479.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., and Chan, T. (1994). Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200-212.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montarnal, P., and Shu, C.-W. (1999). Real gas computation using an energy relaxation method and high order WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 148, 59-80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noelle, S. (2000). The MoT-ICE: a new high-resolution wave-propagation algorithm for multidimensional systems of conservation laws based on Fey's method of transport. J. Comput. Phys. 164, 283-334.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shi, J., Hu, C., and Shu, C.-W. (2002). A technique of treating negative weights in WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 175, 108-127.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shu, C.-W. (1998). Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. In Cockburn, B., Johnson, C., Shu, C.-W., and Tadmor, E. (Quarteroni, A. (ed)), Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1697, Springer, pp. 325-432.

  22. Shu, C.-W. (1999). High order ENO and WENO schemes for computational fluid dynamics. In Barth, T. J., and Deconinck, H. (eds.), High-Order Methods for Computational Physics, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 9, Springer, pp. 439-582.

  23. Shu, C.-W. High order finite difference and finite volume WENO schemes and discontinuous Galerkin methods for CFD. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., to appear.

  24. Shu, C.-W., and Osher, S. (1988). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77, 439-471.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shu, C.-W., and Osher, S. (1989). Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83, 32-78.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Part-Enander, E., and Sjogreen, B. (1994). Conservative and non-conservative interpolation between overlapping grids for finite volume solutions of hyperbolic problems. Computers Fluids 23, 551-574.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quemere, P., Sagaut, P., and Couailler, V. (2001). A new multidomain/multiresolution method for large-eddy simulation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 36, 391-416.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tang, H.-S., and Zhou, T. (1999). On nonconservative algorithms for grid interfaces. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37, 173-193.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Woodward, P., and Colella, P. (1984). The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 115-173.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, J., Yang, S., Chen, Y., and Hsu, C. (1998). Implicit weighted ENO schemes for the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 146, 464-487.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Y.-T. and Shu, C.-W. High order WENO schemes for Hamilton–Jacobi equations on triangular meshes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., to appear.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sebastian, K., Shu, CW. Multidomain WENO Finite Difference Method with Interpolation at Subdomain Interfaces. Journal of Scientific Computing 19, 405–438 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025372429380

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025372429380

Navigation