Skip to main content
Log in

On the Issues in Implementing the Peer Model in Integrated Optical Networks

  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper contributes to a much-needed understanding of the operation, design, implementation, and evaluation of the peer model in integrated optical networks. The overlay and peer models of operation form the two fundamental architectural alternatives for interworking the control planes of optical TDM/WDM networks with those of packet or cell-based networks. Of these, the overlay model is well understood, having a precedence in IP-over-ATM networks deployed in the mid 1990s. It follows a proven approach to managing multi-area, multi-domain networks. The peer model, on the other hand, has not been implemented yet, and has also not been analyzed adequately in the literature. To enable service providers to implement either model, based on the respective merits of each, it is fundamentally important to develop a working solution for the peer model. The focus of this paper is to provide such a solution, perform a complexity analysis of the solution, and discuss its impact on the design of the protocols and the packet and transport layer devices that must interwork to realize this model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Cisco IP+optical unified control plane: Accelerating service velocity with IP-enabled provisioning, Cisco Whitepaper, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/solutions/optical/docs/ucp_wp.pdf

  2. The unified control plane for IP and optical networks, Cisco Whitepaper, http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/olpl/metro/on15327/prodlit/ipto_wp.pdf

  3. A management architecture for IP-over-WDM integration, http://www.terena.nl/conferences/tnc2001/proceedings/PaperKarayannis.pdf

  4. The evolution of telecommunications transport architecture: From megabits to terabits, http://www.iee.org/Publish/Support/Auth/ece0101–33.pdf

  5. Optical fiber communication: From transmission to networking http://www.comsoc.org/livepubs/ci1/public/anniv/rama.html

  6. Interworking with the intelligent optical layer http://www.lightreading.com/opticalintellect/document.asp?doc_id = 67&mode=print

  7. V. Sharma, A. Das, C. Chen, Leveraging IP signaling and routing to manage UPSR-based SONET networks. Proc. ICC 2003, (Anchorage, AK, May 2003), pp. 11–15.

  8. D. Katz, D. Yeung, K. Kompella, Traffic engineering extensions to OSPF version 2, draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-07.txt, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-07.txt (August, 2002).

  9. K. Kompella, et al., OSPF extensions in support of Generalized MPLS, draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-08.txt,”http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-08.txt, (August 2002).

  10. L. Berger (ed.), Generalized MPLS: Signaling—RSVP-TE extensions, draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-08.txt, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvpte-08.txt, (August 2002).

  11. B. Gleeson, et al., A framework for IP based virtual private networks, RFC 2764, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2764.txt

  12. Hamid-Ould Brahim, et al., Network based IP VPN architecture using virtual routers, draft-ietf-ppvpn-vpn-vr-01.txt, http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/01dec/I-D/draft-ietf-ppvpn-vpn-vr-01.txt

  13. E. Rosen, Y. Rekhter, BGP/MPLS VPNs, RFC 2547, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2547.txt

  14. P. Morrissey, Demystifying access control lists, http://www.networkcomputing.com/907/907ws1.html

  15. J. Moy, OSPF Version 2, RFC 2328, (October 1998).

  16. G. Swallow, MPLS advantages for traffic engineering, IEEE Commun. Mag, vol. 37, no. 12, (December 1999), pp. 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Awduche, Y. Rekhter, Multiprotocol lambda switching: Combining MPLS traffic engineering control with optical crossconnects, IEEE Commun. Mag, vol. 39, no. 3, (March 2001), pp. 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Bernstein, J. Yates, D. Saha, IP-centric control and management of optical networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 38, no. 10, (Oct. 2000), pp. 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Bernstein, E. Mannie, V. Sharma, Framework for MPLS-based control of SDH/SONET optical networks, IEEE Network, (July/August 2001), pp. 20–26.

  20. E. Mannie, D. Papadimitrou (eds), Generalized multi-protocol label switching extensions for SDH/SONET control, work in progress, Internet Draft, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-08.txt, (February 2003).

  21. A. Banerjee, et al., Generalized multi-protocol label switching: An overview of signaling enhancements and recovery techniques, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 7, (July 2001), pp. 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Banerjee, et al., Generalized multi-protocol label switching: An overview of routing and management enhancements, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 39, no. 1, (Jan. 2001), pp. 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Mannie, Generalized multi-protocol label switching architecture, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-03.txt, http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-03.txt

  24. Optical Internetworking Forum, OIF-UNI 1.0 Signaling Specification, http://www.oiforum.com/public/documents/OIF-UNI-01.0.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vishal Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, V., Das, A. & Chen, C. On the Issues in Implementing the Peer Model in Integrated Optical Networks. Photonic Network Communications 8, 7–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000031615.13322.a7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PNET.0000031615.13322.a7

Navigation