Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-Infinite Programming and Applications to Minimax Problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A minimisation problem with infinitely many constraints – semi-infinite programming problem (SIP) is considered. The problem is solved using a two stage procedure that searches for global maximum violation of the constraints. A version of the algorithm that searches for any violation of constraints is also considered, and the performance of the two algorithm is compared. An application to solving minimax problem (with and without coupled constraints) is given and a comparison with the algorithm for continuous minimax of Rustem and Howe (2001) is included. Finally, we consider an application to chemical engineering problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asprey, S.P. and S. Macchietto. (2000). “Statistical Tools for Optimal Dynamic Model Building.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 24, 1261–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship, J.W. and J.E. Falk. (1976). “Infinitely Constrained Optimization Problems.” JOTA 19, 261–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, S., L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan. (1994). Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope, I.D. and G.A. Watson. (1985). “A Projected Lagrangian Algorithm for Semi-Infinite Programming.” Math. Programming 32, 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danskin, J.M. (1967). The Theory of Max-Min. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, J., C.C. Pantelides, B. Rustem, and B.A. Tanyi. (1999). “An Algorithm for Constrained Nonlinear Optimization under Uncertainty.” Automatica 35, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demyanov, V.F. and A.B. Pevnyi. (1971). “Numerical Methods for Finding Saddle Points.” USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 12, 1099–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, I.E. and R.W.H. Sargent. (1978). “Optimum Design of Chemical Plants with Uncertain Parameters.” AIChE J. 24, 1021–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, S.A. (1981). “A Three-Phase Algorithm for Semi-Infinite Programming.” In A.V. Fiacco and O. Kortanek (eds.), Semi-Infinite Programming and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 215, Berlin: Springer, pp. 138–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halemane, K.P. and I.E. Grossmann. (1983). “Optimal Process Design Under Uncertainty.” AIChE J. 29, 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, R. and K.O. Kortanek. (1993). “Semi-Infinite Programming: Theory, Methods and Applications.” SIAM Review 35, 380–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, F. (1948). “Extremum Problems with Inequalities as Subsidiary Condition.” In Studies and Essays, Courant Anniversary Volume. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kall, P. and S. Wallace. (1994). Stochastic Programming. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, B.M. and E.J. Haug. (1976). “Optimum Design in the Presence of Parametric Uncertainty.” JOTA 19, 527–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayne, D.Q., E. Polak, and R. Trahan. (1979). “An Outer Approximation Algorithm for Computer-Aided Design Problems.” JOTA 28, 331–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, G.E. (1996). “Finding Saddle Points on Polyhedra: Solving Certain Continuous Minimax Problems.” Naval Research Logistics 43, 821–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAG Library. “Subroutine E04UCF.” Available at WWW: http://www.nag.co.uk/numeric/fl/manual/html/ FLlibrarymanual.asp

  • Panin, V.M. (1981). “Linearization Method for Continuous Min-Max Problems.” Kibernetika 2, 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak, E. and D.Q. Mayne. (1976). “An Algorithm for Optimization Problems with Functional Inequality Constraints.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 21, 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prekopa, A. (1995). Stochastic Programming. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinnooy Kan, A. and G.T. Timmer. (1987). “Stochastic Global Optimization Methods. Part II: Multilevel Methods.” Mathematical Programming 78, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafeller, R.T. (1972). Convex Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, J.B. (1965). “Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave n-Person Games.” Econometrica 33, 520–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustem, B. and M.A. Howe. (2001). Algorithms for Worst-Case Design and Applications to Risk Management. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakovic, S., C.C. Pantelides, and B. Rustem. (2000). “An Interior Point Algorithm for Computing Saddle Points of Constrained Continuous Minimax.” Annals of Operations Research 99, 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasai, H. (1974). “An Interior Penalty Method for Minimax Problems with Constraints.” SIAM J. Control 12, 643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, K. and E. Aiyoshi. (1980). “Necessary Conditions for Min-Max Problems and Algorithms by a Relaxation Procedure.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 25, 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, L. and S. Boyd. (1998). “Connections between Semi-Infinite and Semidefinite Programming.” In R. Reemtsen and J.J. Rueckmann (eds.), Semi-Infinite Programming. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berc Rustem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Žaković, S., Rustem, B. Semi-Infinite Programming and Applications to Minimax Problems. Annals of Operations Research 124, 81–110 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000004764.76984.30

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000004764.76984.30

Navigation