Abstract
In this paper, we examine the effect of product variety on inventory costs in a production–inventory system with finite capacity where products are made to stock and share the same manufacturing facility. The facility incurs a setup time whenever it switches from producing one product type to another. The production facility has a finite production rate and stochastic production times. In order to mitigate the effect of setups, products are produced in batches. In contrast to inventory systems with exogenous lead times, we show that inventory costs increase almost linearly in the number of products. More importantly, we show that the rate of increase is sensitive to system parameters including demand and process variability, demand and capacity levels, and setup times. The effect of these parameters can be counterintuitive. For example, we show that the relative increase in cost due to higher product variety is decreasing in demand and process variability. We also show that it is decreasing in expected production time. On the other hand, we find that the relative cost is increasing in expected setup time, setup time variability and aggregate demand rate. Furthermore, we show that the effect of product variety on optimal base stock levels is not monotonic. We use the model to draw several managerial insights regarding the value of variety-reducing strategies such as product consolidation and delayed differentiation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, M., T.V. Kumaresh, and G.A. Mercer. (2001). “The False Promise of Mass Customization.” The McKinsey Quaterly 3.
Albin, S.L. (1984). “Approximating a Point Process by a Renewal Process, II: Superposition Arrival Processes to Queues.” Operations Research 32, 1133–1162.
Albin, S.L. (1986). “Delays for Customers from Different Arrival Streams to a Queue.” Management Science 32, 329–340.
Alfaro, J.A. and C.J. Corbett. (1999). “The Value of SKU Rationalization in Practice: The Value of Inventory Pooling under Suboptimal Inventory Policies.” Working Paper, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, CA.
Aviv, Y. and A. Federgruen. (1999). “The Benefits of Design for Postponement.” In S. Tayur, R. Ganeshan, and M. Magazine (eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, pp. 553–584. Kluwer Academic.
Benjaafar, S., W. Cooper, and J.S. Kim. (2003). “On the Benefits of Inventory Pooling in Production-Inventory Systems.” Working Paper, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Benjaafar, S. and J.S. Kim. (2001). “When does Higher Demand Variability Lead to Lower Safety Stocks?” Working Paper, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Buzacott, J.A. and J.G. Shanthikumar. (1993). Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems. Prentice Hall.
DeGroote, X., E. Yucesan, and S. Kavadias. (1999). “Product Variety and Leadtime Performance.”Working Paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.
Dobson, G. and C.A. Yano. (2001). “Product Offering, Pricing, Make-to-Order versus Make-to-Stock and Cycle Time Decisions with Shared Manufacturing Capacity.” Working Paper, University of Rochester.
Eppen, G.D. (1979). “Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in Multi-Location Newsboy Problems.” Management Science 25, 498–501.
Federgruen, A., G. Gallego, and Z. Katalan. (2000). “The Effect of Product Variety on Manufacturing Performance.” Working Paper, School of Business, Columbia University.
Fisher, M.L. and C.D. Ittner. (1999). “The Impact of Product Variety on Automobile Assembly Operations: Empirical Evidence and Simulation Analysis.” Management Science 45, 771–786.
Garg, A. and H.L. Lee. (1999). “Managing Product Variety: An Operations Perspective.” In S. Tayur, R.M. Ganeshan, and M. Magazine (eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, pp. 467–490. Kluwer Academic.
Green, P. and A. Krieger. (1985). “Models and Heuristics for Product Line Selection.” Marketing Science 4, 1–19.
Ho, T. and C. Tang (eds). (1998). Managing Product Variety. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Kekre, S. and K. Srinivasan. (1990). “Broader Product Line: A Necessity to Achieve Success?” Management Science 36, 240–251.
Kelton, D.W., R.P. Sadowski, and D.A. Sadowski. (1998). Simulation with Arena. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Lancaster, K. (1990). “The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey.” Marketing Science 9, 189–210.
MacDuffie, J.P., K. Sethuraman, and M.L. Fisher. (1998). “Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from the International Automotive Assembly Plant Study.” Management Science 42, 350–370.
Quelch, J.A. and D. Kenny. (1994). “Extend Profits, not Product Lines.” Harvard Business Review 72(5), 153–160.
Randall, T. and K. Ulrich. (2001). “Product Variety, Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis of the U.S. Bicycle Industry.” Management Science 47, 1588–1604.
Thonemann, U.W. and J.R. Bradley. (2002). “The Effect of Product Variety on Supply Chain-Performance.” European Journal of Operational Research, Forthcoming.
Van Ryzin, G. and S. Mahajan. (1999). “On the Relationship between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retail Assortments.” Management Science 45, 1496–1509.
de Vericourt, F., F. Karaesmen, and Y. Dallery. (2000). “Dynamic Scheduling in a Make-to-Stock System: A Partial Characterization of Optimal Policies.” Operations Research 40, 811–819.
Whitt, W. (1982). “Approximating a Point Process by a Renewal Process, I: Two Basic Approaches.” Operations Research 30, 125–147.
Zipkin, P. (1995). “Performance Analysis of a Multi-Item Production-Inventory System under Alternative Policies.” Management Science 41, 690–703.
Zipkin, P. (2001). “The Limits of Mass Customization.” Sloan Management Review 42, 81–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benjaafar, S., Kim, JS. & Vishwanadham, N. On the Effect of Product Variety in Production–Inventory Systems. Annals of Operations Research 126, 71–101 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000012276.87248.c7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000012276.87248.c7