Abstract
This study shows that a task as complicated as multi-object ‘ant-like annular sorting’ can be accomplished with ‘minimalist’ solutions employing simple mechanisms and minimal hardware. It provides an alternative to ‘patch sorting’ for multi-object sorting. Three different mechanisms, based on hypotheses about the behaviour of Leptothorax ants are investigated and comparisons are made. Mechanism I employs a simple clustering algorithm, with objects of different sizes. The mechanism explores the idea that it is the size difference of the object that promotes segregation. Mechanism II is an extension to our earlier two-object segregation mechanism. We test the ability of this mechanism to segregate an increased number of object types. Mechanism III uses a combined leaky integrator, which allows a greater segregation of object types while retaining the compactness of the structure. Its performance is improved by optimizing the mechanism's parameters using a genetic algorithm. We compare the three mechanisms in terms of sorting performance. Comparisons between the results of these sorting mechanisms and the behaviour of ants should facilitate further insights into both biological and robotic research and make a contribution to the further development of swarm robotics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, G.C. and Grimson, M.J. 1990. The physics of muesli. New Scientist, 26:37–34.
Beckers, R., Holland, O., and Deneubourg, J.-L. 1994. From local actions to global tasks: Stigmergy in collective robotics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Life, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 181–189.
Camazine, S. 1991. Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28:61–76.
de Jong, K.A. 1975. Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic algorithms, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, MI.
Denny, A.J. 2003. An experimental analysis of polydomy in the ant leptothorax albipennis, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bristol, UK.
Deneubourg, J.-L., Goss, S., Franks, N., Sendova-Franks, A., Detrain, C., and Chretien, L. 1991. The dynamics of collective sorting: Robot-like ants and ant-like robots. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 356–365.
Fisher, N.I. 1993. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Franks, N.R. and Sendova-Franks, A.B. 1992. Brood sorting by ants: Distributing theworkload over thework-surface. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 30:109–123.
Goldberg, M. 1971. Packing of 14, 16, 17 and 20 circles in a circle. Mathematics Magazine, 44:134–139.
Holland, J.H. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI.
Holland, O.E. and Melhuish, C.R. 1999. Stigmergy, selforganisation, and sorting in collective robotics. Artificial Life, 5:173–202.
Jeanne, R.L. and Nordheim, E.V. 1996. Productivity in a socialwasp: Per capita output increases with swarm size. Behavioral Ecology, 7:43–48.
Johnson, P.J. and Bay, J.S. 1994. Distributed control of autonomous mobile robot collectives in payload transportation. Technical report. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, U.S.A.
Kravitz, S. 1967. Packing cylinders into cylindrical containers. Mathematics Magazine, 40:65–70.
Krieger, M.J.B., Billeter, J.-B., and Keller, L. 2000. Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots. Nature, 406:992–995.
Lubachevsky, B.D. and Graham, R.L. 1997. Curved hexagonal packings of equal disks in a circle. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 18:179–194.
Lumer, E.D. and Faieta, B. 1994. Diversity and adaptation in populations of clustering ants. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 499–508.
McCoy, E.J. 1991. Brood Sorting by Ants and Related Spatial Statistics, M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Bath, U.K.
Melhuish, C. 1999. Strategies for Collective Minimalist Mobile Robots, Ph.D. Thesis, University of the West of England, Bristol, U.K.
Melhuish, C., Holland, O., and Hoddell, S. 1998. Collective sorting and segregation in robots with minimal sensing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 465–470.
Melhuish, C., Wilson, M., and Sendova-Franks, A.B. 2001. Patchsorting: Multi-object clustering using minimalist robots. Proceedings of 6th European Conference, Prague, Advances in Artificial Life, 2159:543–552.
Rao, J.S. 1969. Some Contributions to the Analysis of Circular Data, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta, India.
Reis, G.E. 1975. Dense packing of equal circles within a circle. Mathematics Magazine, 48:33–37.
Schneider-Fontán, M. and Matari?, M.J. 1998. Territorial multi-robot task division. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 5:815–822.
Sendova-Franks, A.B. and Franks, N.R. 1995. Demonstrating new social interactions in ant colonies through randomisation tests: Separating seeing from believing. Animal Behaviour, 50:1683–1696.
Sendova-Franks, A.B. and Van lent, J. 2002. Random walk models of worker sorting in ant colonies. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 217:255–274.
Sendova-Franks, A.B., Scholes, S.R., Franks, N.R., and Melhuish, C. 2004. Brood sorting by ants:Two phases and differential diffusion. Animal Behaviour, in press.
Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E., and Deneubourg, J.-L. 1998. The origin of nest complexity in social insects. Complexity, 3:15–25.
Thomas, M.L. and Elgar, M.A. 2003. Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant. Rhytidoponera metallica. Naturwissenschaften, 90:88–92.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, M., Melhuish, C., Sendova-Franks, A.B. et al. Algorithms for Building Annular Structures with Minimalist Robots Inspired by Brood Sorting in Ant Colonies. Autonomous Robots 17, 115–136 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000033969.52486.3d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AURO.0000033969.52486.3d