Skip to main content
Log in

Sociocultural Evolution and Cognitive Ontogenesis: A Sociocultural-Cognitive Algorithm

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sociocultural evolution is defined as the permanent interplay between the evolution of social order, cultural achievements and cognitive ontogenetic development. The key concept is that of social roles that are defined as a set of social rules and role specific knowledge. Sociocultural evolution accordingly is defined as the enlargement and variation of roles and in their social and cognitive dimension and as the variation of the relations between roles. The main theoretical thesis is the hypothesis of heterogeneity: sociocultural evolution is possible only if the degree of role autonomy in a particular society is large enough.

A computational model, the sociocultural-cognitive algorithm is described that captures the main features of the evolution of societies. In particular it can be shown via the model why the hypothesis of heterogeneity is so important: it explains the special way of Western culture that was able totranscendcultural thresholds that limited the evolution of comparable societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander J., B. Giesen, R. Münch and N.J. Smelser, (eds.) (1987), The Micro-Macro-Link. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and J.C. Passeron (1964), Les Héritiers. Les Etudiants et la Culture. Edition de Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. (1995), Darwin's Dangerous Ideas. Evolution and the Meaning of Life. Touchstone, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farraro, T. (2001), Social Action Systems. Foundation and Synthesis in Sociological Theory. Praeger, Westport CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Culture. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns II. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt (M).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., K.J. Holyoak, R.E. Nisbett and P. Thagard (1986), Induction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, J. and J. Schmidt (1999), “Control Parameters in Boolean Networks and Cellular Automata Revisited: From a Logical and a Sociological Point of View,” Complexity, 5(1), 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, J. (2002), An Essay Concerning Sociocultural Evolution. Theoretical Principles and Mathematical Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, J. and J. Schmidt (2002), “The Sociocultural Algorithm (SCA),” in J. Klüver An Essay Concerning Sociocultural Evolution. Theoretical Principles and Mathematical Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, J., J. Schmidt and C. Stoica (2003), “Formal Models, Social Theory, and Computer Simulations. Some Methodical Reflections,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations (JASSS), 6(2).

  • Kohonen, T. and H. Ritter (1989), “Self-Organizing Semantic Maps,” Biological Cybernetics, 61, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B. (1987), “Adaptive Bi-Directional Associative Memories,” Applied Optics, 26(23), 4947–4960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B. (1988), “Bi-Directional Associative Memories,” IEEE Transactions of Systems. Man and Cybernetics, SMC-18, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1987), Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal About the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, S., J.N. Kremer and B.B. Smuts (1998), “System-Dependent Selection, Ecological Feedback and the Emergence of Functional Structures in Ecosystems,” J. Theor. Biology, 192,377–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984), Theorie Sozialer Systeme. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt (M).

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, J. (1970), Clercs and Craftsmen in China and the West. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, S., C. Knudsen and R. Feldberg (1992), “Dynamics of Programmable Matter,” in C.G. Langton,.C. Taylor, J.D. Farmer, and S. Rasmussen (Eds.) Artificial Life II. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, D. (1990), “The Utility of Mathematical Constructs in Building Archaeological Theory,” in A. Voorrips (Ed.) Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework. Bonn: Holos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toynbee, A. (1934-1961), A Study of History (12vols.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klüver, J., Malecki, R., Schmidt, J. et al. Sociocultural Evolution and Cognitive Ontogenesis: A Sociocultural-Cognitive Algorithm. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 9, 255–273 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000026584.19223.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000026584.19223.ef

Navigation