Skip to main content
Log in

Undominated d.c. Decompositions of Quadratic Functions and Applications to Branch-and-Bound Approaches

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we analyze difference-of-convex (d.c.) decompositions for indefinite quadratic functions. Given a quadratic function, there are many possible ways to decompose it as a difference of two convex quadratic functions. Some decompositions are dominated, in the sense that other decompositions exist with a lower curvature. Obviously, undominated decompositions are of particular interest. We provide three different characterizations of such decompositions, and show that there is an infinity of undominated decompositions for indefinite quadratic functions. Moreover, two different procedures will be suggested to find an undominated decomposition starting from a generic one. Finally, we address applications where undominated d.c.d.s may be helpful: in particular, we show how to improve bounds in branch-and-bound procedures for quadratic optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.M. Bomze, “On standard quadratic optimization problems,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 13, pp. 369-387, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I.M. Bomze, “Branch-and-bound approaches to standard quadratic optimization problems,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 22, pp. 17-37, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Dür, “A parametric characterization of local optimality,” Math. Methods of Oper. Research, vol. 57, pp. 101-109, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Hansen, B. Jaumard, M. Ruiz, and J. Xiong, “Global minimization of indefinite quadratic functions subject to box constraints,” Nav. Res. Logist., vol. 40, pp. 373-392, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Horst and V.N. Thoai, “Modification, implementation and comparison of three algorithms for globally solving linearly constrained concave minimization problems,” Computing, vol. 42, pp. 271-289, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Horst and V.N. Thoai, “A newalgorithm for solving the general quadratic programming problem,” Comput. Optim. Appl., vol. 5, pp. 39-48, 1996.

  7. R. Horst and V.N. Thoai, “DC programming: Overview,” J. Optimization Theory Appl., vol. 103, pp. 1-43, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Horst, V.N. Thoai, and J. de Vries, “On geometry and convergence of a class of simplicial covers,” Optimization, vol. 25, pp. 53-64, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Horst and H. Tuy, Global Optimization. Springer: Heidelberg, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.S. Johnson and M.A. Trick (Eds.), “Cliques, coloring, and satisfiability: Second DIMACS implementation challenge,” DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 26. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1996.

  11. A. Kuznetsova and A. Strekalovsky, “On solving the maximum clique problem,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 21, pp. 265-288, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.A. Le Thi and T. Pham Dinh, “Solving a class of linearly constrained indefinite quadratic problems by DC algorithms,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 11, pp. 253-285, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.A. Le Thi and T. Pham Dinh, “A branch and bound method via d.c. optimization algorithms and ellipsoidal technique for box constrained nonconvex quadratic problems,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 13, pp. 171-206, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H.A. Le Thi and T. Pham Dinh, “A continuous approach for large-scale linearly constrained qudratic zero-one programming,” Optimization, vol. 50, pp. 93-120, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Nowak, “A new semidefinite programming bound for indefinite quadratic forms over a simplex,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 14, pp. 357-364, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.M. Pardalos and G. Schnitger, “Checking local optimality in constrained quadratic programming is NP-hard,” Oper. Res. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 33-35, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.M. Pardalos and S.A. Vavasis, “Quadratic programming with one negative eigenvalue is NP-hard,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 1, pp. 15-22, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.N. Parlett, The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem, SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T.Q. Phong, H.A. Le Thi, and T. Pham Dinh, “On globally solving linearly constrained indefinite quadratic minimization problems by decomposition branch and bound method,” RAIRO, Rech. Oper., vol. 30, pp. 31-49, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U. Raber, “A simplicial branch-and-bound method for solving nonconvex all-quadratic programs,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 13, pp. 417-432, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Renegar, A Mathematical View of Interior-Point Methods in Convex Optimization, SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Stix, “Global optimization of standard quadratic problems including parallel approaches,” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Vienna, 2000.

  23. V. Stix, “Target-oriented branch-and-bound method for global optimization,” J. Global Optimiz., vol. 26, pp. 261-277, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bomze, I.M., Locatelli, M. Undominated d.c. Decompositions of Quadratic Functions and Applications to Branch-and-Bound Approaches. Computational Optimization and Applications 28, 227–245 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COAP.0000026886.61324.e4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COAP.0000026886.61324.e4

Navigation