Skip to main content
Log in

Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Auctions

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a flexible architecture for the creation of Internet auctions. It allows the custom definition of the auction parameters, and provides a decentralized control of the auction process. Auction policies are defined as laws in the Law Governed Interaction (LGI) paradigm. Each of these laws specifies not only the auction algorithm itself (e.g., open-cry, Dutch, etc.) but also how to handle the other parameters usually involved in the online auctions, such as certification, auditioning, and treatment of complaints. LGI is used to enforce the rules established in the auction policy within the agents involved in the process. After the agents find out about the actions, they interact in a peer-to-peer communication protocol, reducing the role of the centralized auction room to an advertising registry, and taking profit of the distributed nature of the Internet to conduct the auction. The paper presents an example of an auction law, illustrating the use of the proposed architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Ao, X., N. Minsky, T. Nguyen, and V. Ungureanu. (2000). “Law-Governed Communities over the Internet.” In Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, Limassol, Cyprus, September 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1906. Berlin: Springer, pp. 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clocksin, W.F. and C.S. Mellish. (1981). Programming in Prolog. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellison, C. (November 1999). “The nature of a usable pki.” Computer Networks31, 823–830.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cassady, R., Jr. (1979). Auctions and Auctioneering. Univ. California Press.

  5. Kumar, M. and S. Feldman. (August 1998). “Internet Auctions.” In Fifth USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, pp. 167–176.

  6. Lee, H.G. (1998). “Do Electronic Market Marketplaces Lower the Price of Goods.” Communications of the ACM41(1), 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, H.G. and T.H. Clark. (1996). “Impact of the Electronic Marketplace on Transaction Cost and Market Structure.” International Journal of Electronic Commerce1(1), 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer, J.J.C., R.J. Wieringa, and F.P.M. Dignum. (1998). “The Role of Deontic Logic in the Specification of Information Systems.” In J. Chomicki and G. Saake (eds.), Logic for Databases and Information Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Minsky, N.H. (February 1991). “The Imposition of Protocols over Open Distributed Systems.” IEEE Trans-actionson Software Engineering, 183–195.

  10. Minsky, N.H. and V. Ungureanu. (1998). “Unified Support for Heterogeneous Security Policies in Distributed Systems.” In 7th USENIX Security Symposium

  11. Minsky, N.H. and V. Ungureanu. (1998). “A Mechanism for Establishing Policies for Electronic Commerce.” In The 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), May 1998, pp. 322–331.

  12. Minsky, N.H. and V. Ungureanu. (2000). “Law-Governed Interaction: A Coordination and Control Mechanism for Heterogeneous Distributed Systems.” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology9(3), 273–305.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Minsky, N.H., V. Ungureanu, W. Wang, and J. Zhang. (1996). “Building Reconfiguration Primitives into the Law of a System.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems (ICCDS'96), March 1996, pp. 89–100. Available through http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~minsky/.

  14. Roscheisen, M. and T. Winograd. (1996). “A Communication Agreement Framework for Access/Action Control.” In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 1996, pp. 154–164.

  15. Schneier, B. (1996). Applied Cryptography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ungureanu, V. and N.H. Minsky. (2000). “Establishing Business Rules for Inter-Enterprise Electronic Commerce.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2000), Toledo, Spain, October 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1914. Berlin: Springer, pp. 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wurman, P.R., M.P. Wellman, and W.E. Walsh. (1998). “The Michigan Internet AuctionBot: A Configurable Auction Server for Human and Software Agents.” In K.P. Sycara and M. Wooldridge (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'98), New York. ACM Press, pp. 301–308.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fontoura, M., Ionescu, M. & Minsky, N. Decentralized Peer-to-Peer Auctions. Electronic Commerce Research 5, 7–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000045971.43390.c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000045971.43390.c0

Navigation