Skip to main content
Log in

The Social Contract Core

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The information age has brought with it the promise of unprecedented economic growth based on the efficiencies made possible by new technology. This same greater efficiency has left society with less and less time to adapt to technological progress. Perhaps the greatest cost of this progress is the threat to privacy we all face from unconstrained exchange of our personal information. In response to this threat, the World Wide Web Consortium has introduced the “Platform for Privacy Preferences” (P3P) to allow sites to express policies in machine-readable form and to expose these policies to site visitors [Cranor et al., 8]. However, today P3P does not protect the privacy of individuals, nor does its implementation empower communities or groups to negotiate and establish standards of behavior. It is only through such negotiation or feedback that new social contracts can evolve. We propose a privacy architecture, the Social Contract Core (SCC), designed to use technology to facilitate this feedback and so speed the establishment of new “Social Contracts” needed to protect private data. The goal of SCC is to empower communities, speed the “socialization” of new technology, and encourage the rapid access to, and exchange of, information. Addressing these issues is essential, we feel, to both liberty and economic prosperity in the information age [Kaufman et al., 17].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. AT&T Labs. “Beyond Concern: Understanding Net Users' Attitudes about Online Privacy.” AT&T Labs-ResearchTechnical Report TR 99.4.3. http://www.research.att.com/resources/trs/TRs/99/99.4/99.4.3/report.htm

  2. AT&T Labs. “Security Considerations for Remote Electronic Voting over the Internet.” AT&T Labs-Research.http://avirubin.com/e-voting.security.pdf

  3. Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. (1998). http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1999/9910/childfinal.htm

  4. Coyle, K. (2001). “Protecting Privacy.” NetConnect Library Journal.

  5. Coyle, K. “P3P: Pretty Poor Privacy? A Social Analysis of the Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P).” http://www.kcoyle.net/p3p.html

  6. Cranor, L. and J. Reagle. (1997). “Designing a Social Protocol: Lessons Learned from the Platform for Privacy Preferences Project.” In Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, VA, Sep-tember

  7. Cranor, L. and J. Reagle. (1997). “Protocols for Automated Negotiations with Buyer Anonymity and Seller Reputations.” In Proceedings of the 1997 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference.

  8. Cranor, L., M. Langheinrich, M. Marchiori, M. Presler-Marshall, and J. Reagle. “The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification.” http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-P3P-20010928/

  9. Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act. (1999). http://www.senate.gov/~banking/conf/

  10. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. (1996). http://www.hcfa.gov/hipaa/hipaahm.htm

  11. Hobbes, T. (1650). “The Leviathan.” http://www.orst.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html

  12. Hobbes, T. (1651). “De Cive (The Citizen) Philosophicall Rudiments Concerning Government and Society.” http://www.constitution.org/th/decive.htm

  13. IBM alphaWorks. “WBI Development Kit for Java.” http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/wbidk

  14. IMC.org. “Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar).” http://www.imc.org/rfc2445

  15. Information Commissioner, Responsible for the Data Protection and Freedom of Information Acts. http://www.dataprotection.gov.uk/

  16. Kahn, B., et al. “History of Communications Infrastructures.” http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~gribble/cs39c/Comm/telephone/telephone.html

  17. Kaufman, J., J. Ruvolo, and D. Ford. (2001). “Tempus Fugit and the Need for an E-Social Contract.” In 5th International Conference on Autonomour Agents, Montreal, Canada, May 2001, Workshop 11, p. 77. Extended abstract in Conference Proceedings, p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krishna, A. (October 2001). “What Should You Be Asking about the Privacy Rights of Your Customers?” S.C. Magazine, October 2001. http://www.scmagazine.com/scmagazine/sc-online/2001/article/045/article.html

  19. Locke, J. (1690). “A Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent, and End of Civil Government.” http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm

  20. Macfarlane, R., G. Jacobs, and N. Asokan. (1998). “The Role of Money and Internet in Social Develop-ment.” In Pacific Rim Allied Economic Organizations Conference, Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.icpd.org/development_theory/presentation_to_western_economic.htm

  21. Mulligan, D., A. Schwartz, A. Caoukian, and M. Gurski. (2000). “P3P and Privacy: An Update for the Privacy Community.” Center for Democracy and Technology, March 2000. http://www.cdt.org/ privacy/pet/p3pprivacy.shtml

  22. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). http://www.oecd.org/ GuidelinesforInformationSecurityandPrivacy; http://www1.oecd.org/dsti/sti/it/secur/prod/PRIV-EN.htm

  23. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). “Du contrat social (The Social Contract).” Translated by G.D.H. Cole, public domain http://www.constitution.org/jjr/socon.htm

  24. Unterberg, C.E. Towbin, ASP News, “ASPs Will Help Drive Our Global Economy.” http://www.aspnews.com/analysis/analyst_cols/article/0,2350,4431_420701,00.html

  25. U.S. Census Bureau. “Historical Census of Housing Tables Telephones.” http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/phone.html

  26. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). “Home Computers and Internet Use in the United States: August 2000.” http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf

  27. W3.org. “W3C Platform for Privacy Preferences.” Public Archive of Public Comments. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-p3p-public-comments/

  28. W3.org. “Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification.” http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/

  29. W3.org. “RDF Model Schema for P3P.” http://www.w3.org/2000/07/p3pmodel/

  30. W3.org. “A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1.0 (APPEL 1.0).” http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P-preferences.html

  31. W3.org. “Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS).” http://www.w3.org/PICS

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, J.H., Edlund, S., Ford, D.A. et al. The Social Contract Core. Electronic Commerce Research 5, 141–165 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000045977.47306.16

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ELEC.0000045977.47306.16

Navigation