Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting Corporate Acquisitions: An Application of Uncertain Reasoning Using Rule Induction

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based rule induction techniques such as IXL and ID3 are powerful tools that can be used to classify firms as acquisition candidates or not, based on financial and other data. The purpose of this paper is to develop an expert system that employs uncertainty representation and predicts acquisition targets. We outline in this paper, the features of IXL, a machine learning technique that we use to induce rules. We also discuss how uncertainty is handled by IXL and describe the use of confidence factors. Rules generated by IXL are incorporated into a prototype expert system, ACQTARGET, which evaluates corporate acquisitions. The use of confidence factors in ACQTARGET allows investors to specifically incorporate uncertainties into the decision making process. A set of training examples comprising 65 acquired and 65 non-acquired real world firms is used to generate the rules and a separate holdout sample containing 32 acquired and 32 non-acquired real world firms is used to validate the expert system results. The performance of the expert system is also compared with a conventional discriminant analysis model and a logit model using the same data. The results show that the expert system, ACQTARGET, performs as well as the statistical models and is a useful evaluation tool to classify firms into acquisition and non-acquisition target categories. This rule induction technique can be a valuable decision aid to help financial analysts and investors in their buy/sell decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhigbe A, Madura J. The industry effects regarding the probability of takeovers. The Financial Review 1999:34.

  • Biggs S, Messier Jr. WF, Hansen JV. A descriptive analysis of computer audit specialists' decision-making behavior in advanced computer environments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring 1987):1-21.

  • Chan KCC, Wong AKC. A statistical technique for extracting classificatory knowledge from databases. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Frawley WJ, eds. Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Menlo Park, CA, Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1991:107-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comment R, Schwert GW. Poison or placebo: Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern anti-takeover measures. Journal of Financial Economics 1995;39:3-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland TE, Weston JF. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1998.

  • Cudd M, Duggal R. Industry distributional characteristics of financial ratios: An acquisition theory application. The Financial Review 2000;35:105-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePamphilis D. Mergers, Acquisitions, and other Restructuring Activities. Academic Press, 2001:27-33.

  • Frawley WJ, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Matheus CJ. Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Frawley WJ, eds. Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Menlo Park, CA, Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1991:1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galai D, Masulis RW. The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock. Journal of Financial Economics 1976:53-82.

  • Gray GL. Software review-VP-expert. Expert Systems Review. March 1988:19-21.

  • IntelligenceWare. User's Manual: IDIS. Los Angeles, CA, 1994.

  • IntelligenceWare. IXL: The Machine Learning System. Los Angeles, CA: IntelligenceWare, Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • IntelligenceWare. A Dozen Success Stories. Brochure published by IntelligenceWare, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review 1986;76:321-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge G, Griffiths WE, Hill RC, Lötkepohl H, Lee T. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York, NY: Wiley, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang TP. A composite approach to inducing knowledge for expert system design. Management Science (Jan. 1992):1-17.

  • Lintner J. The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics 1965;47:13-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger K. Topology Without Points. The Carl Menger Lectures, American Mathematical Society, 1953.

  • Messier Jr. WF, Hansen JV. Inducing rules for expert system development: An example using default and bankruptcy data.Management Science 1988:1403-1415.

  • Michalski R, Chilauski R. Learning by being told and learning by examples. Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems 1980:4.

  • Morck R, Schleiffer A, Vishny R. Characteristics of targets of hostile and friendly takeovers. In: Auerbach AJ, ed. Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, Chicago, IL: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1988:101-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson C, Balachandra R. Choosing the right expert system building approach. Decision Sciences 1991;22:354-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulos C. Expert Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DE. Validation of expert systems-With applications to auditing and accounting expert systems. Decision Sciences 1987;18:468-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DE. Using neural networks to predict corporate failure. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 1998;7(3):187-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palepu KG. Predicting takeover targets:Amethodological and empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1986;8:3-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsaye K, Hansson O. Discovering knowledge from large databases. IntelligenceWare Technical Report, Nov. 9, 1987.

  • Parsaye K, Chignell M, Khoshafian S, Wong H. Intelligent Databases. New York: John Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postin T, Fuzzy Topology. Technical Report, Battelle Research Institute, Geneva, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan R. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1986;1:81-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragothaman S, Naik B. Using rule induction for expert system development: The case of asset writedowns. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 1994;3(3):187-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragothaman S, Carpenter J, Naik B. Knowledge acquisition through rule induction: The case of going concern audit reports. Heuristics: The Journal of Intelligent Technologies 1995;8(4):33-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe WF. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 1964;19:425-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw MJ. Applying inductive learning to enhance knowledge based expert systems. Decision Support Systems 1987;3:319-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy PP. Valuation-based systems: A framework for managing uncertainty in expert systems. In: Zadeh LA, Kacprzyk J, eds. Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992:83-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivdasani A. Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers. Journal of Financial Economics 1993;16:167-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Kim Y. Designing expert financial systems: A case study of corporate credit management. Financial Management 1988(Autumn):32-44.

  • Srivastava RP, Datta D. Belief-function approach to evidential reasoning for acquisition and merger decisions. In: Srivastava RP, Mock T, eds. Belief Functions in Business Decisions, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag Company, 2002;222-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theidossiou P, Kahya E, Saidi R, Philippatos G. Financial distress and corporate acquisitions: Further empirical evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 1996;23(5/6):699-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss SM, Kulikowski CA. Computer Systems That Learn. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zairko W. The discovery, analysis, and representation of data dependencies in databases. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Frawley WJ, eds. Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Menlo Park, CA, Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1991:195-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA. The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1983;11:199-227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ragothaman, S., Naik, B. & Ramakrishnan, K. Predicting Corporate Acquisitions: An Application of Uncertain Reasoning Using Rule Induction. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 401–412 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005653.53641.b3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005653.53641.b3

Navigation