Skip to main content
Log in

Memory Fault Modeling Trends: A Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, embedded memories are the fastest growing segment of system on chip. They therefore have a major impact on the overall Defect per Million (DPM). Further, the shrinking technologies and processes introduce new defects that cause previously unknown faults; such faults have to be understood and modeled in order to design appropriate test techniques that can reduce the DPM level. This paper discusses a new memory fault class, namely dynamic faults, based on industrial test results; it defines the concept of dynamic faults based on the fault primitive concept. It further shows the importance of dynamic faults for the new memory technologies and introduces a systematic way for modeling them. It concludes that current and future SRAM products need to consider testability for dynamic faults or leave substantial DPM on the table, and sets a direction for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.S. Abadir and J.K. Reghbati, “Functional Testing of Semiconductor Random Access Memories,” ACMComputer Surveys, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 175-198, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.D. Adams, “High Performance Memory Testing, Kluwer Academic Publisher, ISBN: 1-4020-7255-4, 2003.

  3. Z. Al-Ars and Ad J. van de Goor, “Static and Dynamic Behavior of Memory Cell Array Opens and Shorts in Embedded DRAMs,” Proc. of Design Automation and Test in Europe, 2001, pp. 496-503.

  4. Z. Al-Ars and A.J. van de Goor, “Approximating Infinite Dynamic Behavior for DRAM Cell Defects,” Proc. IEEE VLSI Test Symp., 2002, pp. 401-406.

  5. Allan et al., “2001 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors,” Computer, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 42-53, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.A. Breuer and A.D. Friedman, Diagnosis and Reliable Design of Digital Systems, Woodland Hills, CA, USA: Computer Science Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Dekker et al., “A Realistic Fault Model and Test Algorithms for Static Random Access Memories,” IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C9, no. 6, pp. 567-572, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.H. De Jonge and A.J. Smeulders, “Moving Inversions Test Pattern is Thorough,Yet Speedy,” Comp. Design, 1976, pp. 169-173.

  9. S. Hamdioui and A.J. van de Goor, “Experimental Analysis of Spot Defects inSRAMs:Realistic Fault Models andTests,” Proc. of Ninth Asian Test Symposium, 2000, pp. 131-138.

  10. S. Hamdioui, Z. Al-Ars, and A.J. van de Goor, “Testing Static and Dynamic Faults in Random Access Memories,” Proc. of IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, 2002, pp. 395-400.

  11. S. Hamdioui, A.J. van de Goor, and M. Rodgers, “ March SS: A Test for All Static Simple RAM Faults,” Proc. IEEE InternationalWorkshopon Memory Technology, Design, and Testing, 2002, pp. 95-100.

  12. S. Hamdioui, Z. Al-ars, A.J. van de Goor, and M. Rodgers, “Dynamic Faults in Random Access Memories: Concept, Fault Models and Tests,” Journal of Electronic Testing, Theory and Application, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 195-205, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V.K. Kim and T. Chen, “On Comparing Functional Fault Coverage and Defect Coverage for Memory Testing,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1676-1683, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Marinescu, “Simple and Efficient Algorithms for Functional RAM Testing,” in Proc. of International Test Conference, 1982, pp. 236-239.

  15. S. Naik et al., “Failure Analysis of High Density CMOS SRAMs,” IEEE Design and Test of Computers, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13-23, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Nair, “An Optimal Algorithm for Testing Stuck-at Faults Random Access Memories,” IEEE Trans. on Comp., vol. C-28, no. 3, pp. 258-261, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.S. Suk and S.M. Reddy, “A March Test for Functional Faults in Semiconductors Random-Access Memories,” IEEE Trans. on Comp., vol. C-30, no. 12, pp. 982-985, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.J. van de Goor, Testing Semiconductor Memories, Theory and Practice, ComTex Publishing, Gouda, The Netherlands, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.J. van de Goor and J. de Neef, “Industrial Evaluation of DRAMs Tests,” Proc. of Design Automation and Test in Europe, 1999, pp. 623-630.

  20. A.J. van de Goor and Z. Al-Ars, “Functional Fault Models: A Formal Notation and Taxonomy,” Proc. of IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, 2000, pp. 281-289.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamdioui, S., Wadsworth, R., Reyes, J.D. et al. Memory Fault Modeling Trends: A Case Study. Journal of Electronic Testing 20, 245–255 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JETT.0000029458.57095.bb

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JETT.0000029458.57095.bb

Navigation