Skip to main content
Log in

Behavior Evolution of Multiple Mobile Agents under Solving a Continuous Pursuit Problem Using Artificial Life Concept

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In engineering aspects, the goal of artificial life is to incarnate unique behaviors or phenomena of living creatures in nature into artifacts like computers. Artificial life can provide a useful methodology for multiple mobile agent learning which is full of autonomy and creativity. In this paper, a neural network is used for the behavior decision controller. The input of the neural network is decided by the existence of other agents and the distance to the other agents. The output determines the directions in which the agent moves. The connection weight values of this neural network are encoded as genes, and the fitness of individuals is determined using a genetic algorithm. Here, the fitness values imply how much group behaviors fit adequately to the goal. The validity of the system is verified through simulation. Moreover, in this paper, we could have observed the agents' emergent behaviors during simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asama, A. et al. (eds): Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, Vols I, II, Springer, Berlin, Vol. I 1994, Vol. II 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks and Maes (eds): Artificial Life, Vol. IV, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, R. J. and David, R.: An artificial Neural network representation for artificial organisms, in: Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Parallel Problem Solving, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 496, Springer, New York, 1992, pp. 259-263.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, R. J. and Jefferson, D. R.: Ant farm: Towards simulated evolution, in: Artificial Life, Vol. II, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1991, pp. 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., and Colorni, A.: Ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating robots, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. B: Cybernetics 26(1) (1996), 29-41.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Floreano, D.: Evolutionary robotics in artificial life and behavior engineering, in: T. Gomi (ed.), Evolutionary Robotics, Vol. II, Ontario, Canada, AAI Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Floreano, D., Nolfi, S., and Mondada, F.: Co-evolution and ontogenetic change in competing robots, in: M. Patel, V. Honavar and K. Balakrishnan (eds), Advances in the Evolutionary Synthesis of Intelligent Robots, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

  9. Goldberg, D. E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez, F. and Miikkulainem, R.: Incremental evolution of complex general behavior, Adaptive Behavior 5 (1997), 317-342.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haynes, T. and Sen, S.: Learning cases to resolve conflicts and improve group behavior, Internat. J. Human Computer Studies 48 (1998), 31-49.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hogg, L. M. J. and Jennings, N. R.: Socially intelligent reasoning for autonomous robots, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet. A: Systems and Humans 31(5) (2001), 381-393.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Il-Kwon, J. and Lee, J.-J.: Evolving fuzzy logic controllers for multiple mobile robots solving a continuous pursuit problem, in: IEEE Internat. Fuzzy Systems Conf. Proceedings, 1999, pp. 685-689.

  14. Kam-Chuen, J. and Giles, C. L.: Talkin helps: Evolving communicating robots for the predator-prey pursuit problem, Artificial Life 6 (2000), 237-254.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, D. W., Jun, H. B., and Sim, K. B.: Artificial immune system for realization of cooperative strategies and group behavior in collective autonomous mobile robots, in: Proc. of the 4th Internat. Symp. on Artificial Life and Robotics, 1999, pp. 232-235.

  16. Lee, D. W. and Sim, K. B.: Development of communication system for cooperative behavior in collective autonomous mobile robots, in: Proc. of the 2nd Ascian Control Conf., Vol. 2, July 1997, pp. 615-618.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, D. W. and Sim, K. B.: Behavior learning and evolution of collective autonomous mobile robots using distributed genetic algorithms, in: Proc. of the 2nd Ascian Control Conf., Vol. 2, July 1997, pp. 675-678.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lesser, V. R.: Cooperative multi-robot systems: A personal view of the state of the art, IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 11(1) (1999), 133-142.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nolfi, S. and Floreano, D.: Co-evolving predator and prey robots: Do 'arm races' arise in artificial evolution?, Artificial Life 4(4) (1998), 311-335.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pena-Reyes, C. A. and Sipper, M.: Fuzzy CoCo: A cooperative-Co-evolutionary approach to fuzzy modeling, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 9(5) (2001), 727-737.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sim, K. B.: Realixation of intelligent robot system based on artificial life, J. Korean Electronics 24(3) (1997), 70-82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stone, P. and Veloso, M.: Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective, Autonomous Robots 8 (2000), 345-383.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Takayuki, K. and Matsubayashi: An adaptive architecture for modular Q-learning, in: Proc. of the 10th Internat. Conf. on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000, pp. 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tzafestas, E. S., Raptis, S. N., and Tzafestas, S. G.: Multi-agent robot architectures: The decomposition issue and a case study, Internat. J. Artificial Intelligence Tools 7(2) (1998), 163-187.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tzafestas, E. S.: Compromising algorithmicity and plasticity in autonomous agent control systems: The autonomous cell, J. Intelligent Systems 9(2) (1999), 135-176.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tzafestas, E. S.: Aging agents, Artificial Life Robotics 5 (2001), 46-57.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yasuo, N. and Shin, I.: Multi-robot reinforcement learning: An approach based on the other robot's internal model, in: Proc. of the 8th Conf. on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior: From Animals to Animates:: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999, pp. 478-485.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M., Chang, OB., Yoo, CJ. et al. Behavior Evolution of Multiple Mobile Agents under Solving a Continuous Pursuit Problem Using Artificial Life Concept. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 39, 433–445 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JINT.0000026083.64909.e4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JINT.0000026083.64909.e4

Navigation