Skip to main content
Log in

Exordium for DNA Codes

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe how deletion-correcting codes may be enhanced to yield codes with double-strand DNA-sequence codewords. This enhancement involves abstractions of the pertinent aspects of DNA; it nevertheless ensures specificity of binding for all pairs of single strands derived from its codewords—the key desideratum of DNA codes– i.e. with binding feasible only between reverse complementary strands. We defer discussing the combinatorial-optimization superincumbencies of code construction. Generalization of deletion similarity to an optimal sequence-alignment score could readily effect advantageous improvements (Kaderali, Master's Thesis, Informatics, U. Köln, 2001) but would render the combinatorics opaque. We mention motivating applications of DNA codes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L.M. Adleman, “Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems,” Science, vol. 266, pp. 1021–1024, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • G.I. Bell and D.C. Torney, “Repetitive DNA sequences: Some considerations for simple sequence repeats,” Computers and Chemistry. vol. 17, pp. 185–190, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Breslauer, R. Frank, H. Blocker, and L.A. Markey, “Predicting Duplex DNA Stability from the base sequence,” PNAS USA, vol. 83, pp. 3746–3750, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Cai, P.S. White, D.C. Torney, A. Deshpande, Z. Wang, B. Marrone, and J.P. Nolan, “Flow cytometry-based minisequencing: A new platform for high throughput single nucleotide polymorphism scoring,” Genomics, vol. 66, pp. 135–143, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • C.J. Colbourn and J.H. Dinitz, The CRC Handbook of Combinatorial Designs. CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.G. D'yachkov and D.C. Torney, “On similarity codes,” IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, vol. 46, pp. 1558–1564, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.G. D'yachkov, D.C. Torney, P.A. Vilenkin, and P.S. White, “Reverse—Complement similarity codes,” IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, submitted.

  • P.L. Erdös, P. Ligeti, P. Sziklai, and D. C. Torney, “Subwords in reverse complement order,” in preparation.

  • P.L. Erdös, D.C. Torney, and P. Sziklai, “A finite word poset,” Elec. J. of Combinatorics, vol. 8, 2001.

  • H.D.L. Hollman, “A relation between Levenshtein-type distances and insertion and deletion correcting capabilities of codes,” IEEE Trans. on Information Theory, vol. 39, pp. 1424–1427, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Johnson, Presentation of Groups, 2nd edition. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, vol. 15, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Kaderali, “Selecting target specific probes for DNA arrays,” Master's Thesis, Informatics, U. Köln, 2001.

  • L. Kaderali, A. Deshpande, J.P. Nolan, and P.S. White, “Primer-design for multiplexed genotyping,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, pp. 1796–1802, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • V.I. Levenshtein, “Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals,” J. Soviet Phys. Doklady, vol. 10, pp. 707–710, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Marathe, A.E. Condon, and R.M. Corn, “On combinatorial DNA design,” J. Comp. Biol., vol. 8, pp. 201–219, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.B. Needleman and C.D. Wunsch, “A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino-acid sequences of two proteins,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 48, pp. 443–453, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Q. Ouyang, P.D. Kaplan, S. Liu, and A. Libchaber, “DNA solution of the maximal clique problem,” Science, vol. 278, pp. 446–449, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • V.V. Rykov, A.J. Macula, C.M. Korzelius, D.C. Englehart, D.C. Torney, and P.S. White, “DNA sequences constructed on the basis of quaternary cyclic codes,” in Proceedings of the 4thWorld Multiconference on Systematics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, SCI 2000/ISAS 2000, Orlando, Florida, July 2000.

  • K. Sakamoto, H. Gouzu, K. Komiya, D. Kiga, S. Yokoyama, T. Yokomori, and M. Hagiya, “Molecular computation by DNA hairpin formation,” Science, vol. 288, pp. 1223–1226, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Shalaby, J.M.Wang, and J.X. Yin, “Existence of perfect 4-deletion-correcting-codes with length six,” Designs, Codes and Cryptography, vol. 27, pp. 145–156, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.F. Smith and M.S. Waterman, “Identification of common molecular subsequences,” J. Mol. Biol., vol. 147, pp. 195–197, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Ullman, “On the capabilities of codes to correct synchronization errors,” IEEE IT, vol. 13, pp. 95–105, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Varšamov and G.M. Tenengol'ts, “One-asymmetrical-error correction codes (in Russian),” Avtomatika I Telemekhanika, vol. 26, pp. 288–292, 1965.

  • J. Yin, “A combinatorial construction for perfect deletion-correcting codes,” Designs, Codes, and Cryptography, vol. 26, pp. 99–110, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D'yachkov, A.G., Erdös, P.L., Macula, A.J. et al. Exordium for DNA Codes. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 7, 369–379 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCO.0000017385.39168.0d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOCO.0000017385.39168.0d

Navigation