Abstract
Studying three Chinese major universities of different type, this article attempts to validate earlier results related to authors' name order in papers co-authored by graduate candidates and their supervisors. Candidates for the doctoral degree as well as the master's degree are considered. Defining the g-ratio as the fraction of co-authored publications where the graduate student's name precedes that of the supervisor's we obtain the following results. 1) Generally, master's level g-ratios are smaller than the corresponding doctoral level g-ratios. 2) The three doctoral g-ratio time series have a common characteristic: they tend to a limiting target value of somewhat more than 80%. The master's time series of the three universities extend themselves in parallel with the doctoral time series. 3) The g-ratio of collaborative papers related to the dissertation is higher than the g-ratio of collaborative papers not related to the dissertation. This is true on the doctoral level as well as on the master's level. 4) Different disciplines have different g-ratios, representing disciplinary customs in graduate candidate-supervisor collaboration, the highest g-ratio in the doctoral case occurring in biology (except for Tsinghua University that does not offer courses in biology). 5) There exist only small differences between the g-ratios of different kinds of universities. 6) In recent years, the same candidate-supervisor collaboration patterns exist in international publications as in domestic ones. The fact that the doctoral g-ratios of all three universities are as high as 80% reflects a universal regularity in the structure of scientific collaboration between doctoral candidates and their supervisors in China.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BAYER, A. E., DUTTON, J. E. (1977), Career age and researchprofessional activities of academic scientists. Journal of Higher Education, 48 (3): 259–282.
BONACCORSI, A., DARAIO, C. (2003), Age effects in scientific productivity. The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics, 58: 49.90.
COLE, J. R., COLE, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 1973.
CRONIN, B. (2001), Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 558.569.
DIAMOND. A. M. Jr. (1986), The lifecycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology, 41: 520.525.
EGGHE, L., LIANG, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2003), The byline: thoughts on the distribution of author ranks in multiauthored papers. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38: 323.329.
EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (1990), Introduction to Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
EPSTEIN, R. J. (1993), Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? British Medical Journal, 306: 765.
GARFIELD, E. (1982), More on the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science. Current Contents, July 26. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, 6 (ISI Press, Philadelphia), 1983, pp. 621.626.
GUAN, J. L. (EditorinChief) (2000), China Document Classification, 4th edition, Science and Technology Documentation Publishing House.
HARSANYI, M. A. (1993), Multiple authors, multiple problems. bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review. Library and Information Science Review, 15: 325–354. L. LIANGet al.: Name order patterns in Chinese publications
HOEN, W. P., WALVOORT, H. C., OVERBEKE, A. J. P. M. (1998), What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors’ names? Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 217–218.
INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA(ISTIC) (2000), Chinese Dissertation Document Bibliography Database. Wanfang Data Electronic Publishing House.
JIN, B. H., LI, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2003), Production and productivity of Chinese scientists as a function of their age: the period 19951999. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (G. H. JIANG, R. ROUSSEAU, Y. WU, Eds.). Dalian Technological University Press, Dalian, China, pp. 112–120.
JIN, B. H., ROUSSEAU, R. (2001), An introduction to the barycentre method with an application to China’s mean centre of publication. Libri, 51: 225–233.
JIN, B. H., WANG, B. (1999), Chinese Science Citation Database: its construction and applications. Scientometrics, 45: 325–332.
KRETSCHMER, H., ROUSSEAU, R. (2001), Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka.s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 610–614.
KYVIK, S. (1990), Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning. Higher Education, 19: 37–55.
LANGE, L. (2001), Citation counts of multiauthored papers. Firstnamed authors and further authors. Scientometrics, 52: 457–470.
LEHMAN, H. C. (1953), Age and Achievement. Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press.
LIANG, L. GUO, Y., DAVIS, M. (2001), Collaborative patterns and age structures in Chinese publications. Scientometrics, 54: 473–489.
LIANG, L., KRETSCHMER, H., GUO, Y., DEB. BEAVER, D. (2001), Age structure of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science. Scientometrics, 52: 471–486.
LIANG, L., WU, Y., DING, F., WANG, Y. (1999), New developments in the study of distribution of major scientific and cultural achievements in terms of age. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (MACÍASCHAPULA, Ed.), Colima (Mexico): Universidad de Colima, pp. 286–293.
LINDSEY, D. (1982), Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 4: 389–395.
RUDD, E. (1977), The effect of alphabetical order of author listing on the career of scientists. Social Studies of Science, 7: 268.269.
SHEVLIN, M., DAVIES, M. N. O. (1997), Alphabetical listing and citation rates. Nature, 388: 14.
SIMONTON, D. K. (1997), Creative productivity: a predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks, Psychological Review, 104:66–89.
ZHAO, H. Z. (1984), An introduction to the study of science potential. Beijing: Science Press, (in Chinese).
ZUCKERMAN, H. A. (1968), Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity, American Journal of Sociology, 74: 276–291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, L., Liu, J. & Rousseau, R. Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities. Scientometrics 61, 3–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f