Skip to main content
Log in

Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studying three Chinese major universities of different type, this article attempts to validate earlier results related to authors' name order in papers co-authored by graduate candidates and their supervisors. Candidates for the doctoral degree as well as the master's degree are considered. Defining the g-ratio as the fraction of co-authored publications where the graduate student's name precedes that of the supervisor's we obtain the following results. 1) Generally, master's level g-ratios are smaller than the corresponding doctoral level g-ratios. 2) The three doctoral g-ratio time series have a common characteristic: they tend to a limiting target value of somewhat more than 80%. The master's time series of the three universities extend themselves in parallel with the doctoral time series. 3) The g-ratio of collaborative papers related to the dissertation is higher than the g-ratio of collaborative papers not related to the dissertation. This is true on the doctoral level as well as on the master's level. 4) Different disciplines have different g-ratios, representing disciplinary customs in graduate candidate-supervisor collaboration, the highest g-ratio in the doctoral case occurring in biology (except for Tsinghua University that does not offer courses in biology). 5) There exist only small differences between the g-ratios of different kinds of universities. 6) In recent years, the same candidate-supervisor collaboration patterns exist in international publications as in domestic ones. The fact that the doctoral g-ratios of all three universities are as high as 80% reflects a universal regularity in the structure of scientific collaboration between doctoral candidates and their supervisors in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BAYER, A. E., DUTTON, J. E. (1977), Career age and research­professional activities of academic scientists. Journal of Higher Education, 48 (3): 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BONACCORSI, A., DARAIO, C. (2003), Age effects in scientific productivity. The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR). Scientometrics, 58: 49.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COLE, J. R., COLE, S. (1973), Social Stratification in Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRONIN, B. (2001), Hyperauthorship: a postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 558.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIAMOND. A. M. Jr. (1986), The life­cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology, 41: 520.525.

    Google Scholar 

  • EGGHE, L., LIANG, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2003), The byline: thoughts on the distribution of author ranks in multi­authored papers. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38: 323.329.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (1990), Introduction to Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. J. (1993), Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? British Medical Journal, 306: 765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GARFIELD, E. (1982), More on the ethics of scientific publication: abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia undermine the reward system of science. Current Contents, July 26. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, 6 (ISI Press, Philadelphia), 1983, pp. 621.626.

    Google Scholar 

  • GUAN, J. L. (Editor­in­Chief) (2000), China Document Classification, 4th edition, Science and Technology Documentation Publishing House.

  • HARSANYI, M. A. (1993), Multiple authors, multiple problems. bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review. Library and Information Science Review, 15: 325–354. L. LIANGet al.: Name order patterns in Chinese publications

    Google Scholar 

  • HOEN, W. P., WALVOORT, H. C., OVERBEKE, A. J. P. M. (1998), What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors’ names? Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 217–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA(ISTIC) (2000), Chinese Dissertation Document Bibliography Database. Wanfang Data Electronic Publishing House.

  • JIN, B. H., LI, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2003), Production and productivity of Chinese scientists as a function of their age: the period 1995­1999. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (G. H. JIANG, R. ROUSSEAU, Y. WU, Eds.). Dalian Technological University Press, Dalian, China, pp. 112–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • JIN, B. H., ROUSSEAU, R. (2001), An introduction to the barycentre method with an application to China’s mean centre of publication. Libri, 51: 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • JIN, B. H., WANG, B. (1999), Chinese Science Citation Database: its construction and applications. Scientometrics, 45: 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KRETSCHMER, H., ROUSSEAU, R. (2001), Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka.s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52: 610–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KYVIK, S. (1990), Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning. Higher Education, 19: 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • LANGE, L. (2001), Citation counts of multi­authored papers. First­named authors and further authors. Scientometrics, 52: 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEHMAN, H. C. (1953), Age and Achievement. Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIANG, L. GUO, Y., DAVIS, M. (2001), Collaborative patterns and age structures in Chinese publications. Scientometrics, 54: 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LIANG, L., KRETSCHMER, H., GUO, Y., DEB. BEAVER, D. (2001), Age structure of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science. Scientometrics, 52: 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LIANG, L., WU, Y., DING, F., WANG, Y. (1999), New developments in the study of distribution of major scientific and cultural achievements in terms of age. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (MACÍAS­CHAPULA, Ed.), Colima (Mexico): Universidad de Colima, pp. 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINDSEY, D. (1982), Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship. Scientometrics, 4: 389–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RUDD, E. (1977), The effect of alphabetical order of author listing on the career of scientists. Social Studies of Science, 7: 268.269.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHEVLIN, M., DAVIES, M. N. O. (1997), Alphabetical listing and citation rates. Nature, 388: 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIMONTON, D. K. (1997), Creative productivity: a predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks, Psychological Review, 104:66–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZHAO, H. Z. (1984), An introduction to the study of science potential. Beijing: Science Press, (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • ZUCKERMAN, H. A. (1968), Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity, American Journal of Sociology, 74: 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Rousseau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, L., Liu, J. & Rousseau, R. Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities. Scientometrics 61, 3–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037359.22151.6f

Keywords

Navigation