Abstract
Reports the results of a citation study on Watson and Crick's 1953 paper announcing the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA. The paper has been cited more than 2,000 times since 1961, and there is no sign of any obsolescence to this article. An analysis was undertaken of the journals in which the citations appeared, and of mistakes in the bibliographic citations provided by citing articles. Watson and Crick themselves have only cited their own paper twice since 1961.
An analysis was also undertaken of the reasons why the paper was cited; 100 citing articles were identified and read. The reasons for citing were then categorised using the Oppenheim and Renn method. Compared to earlier studies, it was found that a greater proportion of citations were for historical reasons, a smaller proportion of citing articles were actively using the Watson and Crick article, and a similar, but low proportion were criticising the Watson and Crick article.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALVAREZ, P., ESCALONA. I., PULGARIN, A. (2000), What is wrong with obsolescence? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (9): 812–815.
BAIRD, L., OPPENHEIM, C. (1994), Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20 (1): 2–15.
BROOKS, T. A. (1985), Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (4), 223–229.
BROOKS, T. A. (1986), Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (1): 34–36.
CANO, V. (1989), Citation behaviour: classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (4): 284–290.
CASE, D. O., HIGGINS, G. M. (2000), How can we investigate citation behaviour? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (7): 635–645.
CHUBIN, D. E., MOITRA, S. D. (1975), Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5: 423–441.
CRONIN, B. (1984), The Citation Process: Taylor Graham.
GARFIELD, E. (1979), Citation Indexing-Its Theory and application in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
MACROBERTS, M. H., MACROBERTS, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (5): 342–349.
MOED, H. F. (2002), The Impact Factors debate: ISI's uses and limitations. Nature, 415: 731–732.
MORAVCSIK, M. J., MURUGESAN, P. (1975), Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5: 86–92.
OPPENHEIM, C. (1995), The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation, 51 (1): 18–27.
OPPENHEIM, C., RENN, S. P. (1978), Highly cited papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29: 225–231.
SENG, L. B., WILLETT, P. (1995), The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools. Journal of Information Science, 21 (1): 68–71.
SIMKIN, M. V., ROYCHOWDHURY, V. P. (2003), Read Before You Cite! Retrieved March 31, 2003, from the World Wide Web: http://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0212/0212043.pdf
SNYDER, H., BONZI, S. (1998), Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24 (6): 431–435.
TAYLOR, J. (1995), A statistical analysis of the 1992 research assessment exercise. Journal of the Royal Statisical Society, 158 (2): 241–261.
WARNER, J. (2000), A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises. Journal of Information Science, 26 (6): 453–460.
WATSON, J. D., CRICK, F. H. C. (1953), A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature, 171 (4356): 737–738.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, T., Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C. et al. Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Part II., The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA. Scientometrics 61, 147–156 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041645.60907.57
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041645.60907.57