Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study characterizes the dynamic publication activity of global knowledge management (KM) by data collected through a search restricted to articles in ISI Web of Science.A total of 2727 unique authors had contributed 1407 publications since 1975. The overwhelming majority (2349 or 86%) of them wrote one publication. The productive authors, their contribution and authorship position are listed to indicate their productivity and degree of involvement in their research publications. The sum of research output of the first or responsible authors from USA, UK and Germany reaches 57% of the total productivity. The distribution of articles is rather widespread - they published in 462 titles of serials, spanning 110 Journal Citation Reports subject categories. The higher quality journals make publication of findings more visible. A Pearson's correlation coefficient is statistically found to be significant between citation frequency of article and impact factor of journal, instead of authorship pattern. The results also indicate that R&D expenditures were actually not proportional to research productivity or citation counts. As the subject highly interacts with other disciplines, the field of KM has not yet developed its own body of literature. KM might have been evolving an interdisciplinary theory that is developing at the boundaries of scientific disciplines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARCLAY, R. O., MURRAY, P. C. (1997), What Is Knowledge Management? [On-line]. Available: http://www.media-access.com/whatis.html

  • BASU, A., AGGARWAL, R. (2001), International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics, 52 (3): 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIRD, J. E. (1997), Authorship patterns in marine mammal science, 1985-1993. Scientometrics, 39 (1): 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BORDONS, M., FERNANDEZ, M. T., GOMEZ, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53 (2): 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BORDONS, M., GOMEZ, I., FERNANDEZ, M. T., ZULUETA, M. A., MENDEZ, A. (1996), Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37 (2): 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOVIER, P. A., GUILLAIN, H., PERNEGER, T. V. (2001), Productivity of medical research in Switzerland. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 49 (1): 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • CALLAHAM, M., WEARS, R. L., WEBER, E. (2002), Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (21): 2847–2850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRONIN, B., SHAW, D. (1999), Citation, funding acknowledgement and author nationality relationships in four information science journals. Journal of Documentation, 55 (4): 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GLÄNZEL, W. (2002), Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980Œ1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50 (3): 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A., CZERWON, H. J. (1999), An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis. Scientometrics, 44 (3): 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOLDER, W. (2000), Who controls the controllers? Ten statements on the so-called impact factor. Onkologie, 23 (1): 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRANGE, R. I. (1999), National bias in citations in urology journals: parochialism or availability? BJU international, 84 (6): 601–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICASIT (2003a), KM Resources: KM Companies. [On-line]. Available: http://www.icasit.org/km/resources/companies.htm

  • ICASIT (2003b), KMCentral: KM Degree Programs. [On-line]. Available: http://www.icasit.org/km/academia/kmdegrees.htm

  • INGWERSEN, P., LARSEN, B., WORMELL, I. (2000), Applying diachronic citation analysis to research program evaluations. In: B. CRONIN, H. BARSKY ATKINS (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series. Metford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 373–387.

  • KATZ, J. S., HICKS, D. (1997), How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40 (3): 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KING, J. T. (2000), How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research. Neurosurgery, 47 (2): 435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEE, K. P., SCHOTLAND, M., BACCHETTI, P., BERO, L. A. (2002), Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 (21): 2805–2808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCCAIN, K.W. (1998), Neural network research in context: a longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 41 (3): 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCCAIN, K.W., WHITNEY, J. P. (1994), Contrasting assessments of interdisciplinarity in emerging specialties: the case of neural networks research. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 15 (3): 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCINERNEY, C. (2002), Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12): 1009–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOED, H. F., LUWEI, M., NEDERHOF, A. J. (2002), Towards research performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50 (3): 498–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard Œ Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. [On-line]. Available: http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/92-2001-04-1-2987/gA-1-a.htm

  • POULIN, R. (2002), Qualitative and quantitative aspects of recent research on helminth parasites. Journal of Helminthology, 76 (4): 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RENNIE, D., YANK, V., EMANUEL, L. (1997), When authorship fails Œ a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association, 278 (7): 579–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROUSSEAU, R., VAN HOOYDONK, G. (1996), Journal production and journal impact factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (10): 775–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHOONBAERT, D., ROELANTS, G. (1996), Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications: quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? Tropical Medicine & International Health, 1 (6): 739–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEGLEN, P. O., AKSNES, D. W. (2000), Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49 (1): 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKYRME, D. J. (1998a), Beneath the Fad: The Future of Knowledge Management. [On-line]. Available: http://www.skyrme.com/updates/u20.htm

  • SKYRME, D. J. (1998b), Knowledge Management-Three Years On: Are We Confused? [On-line]. Available: http://www.skyrme.com/updates/u25.htm#km3

  • SLONE, R. M. (1996), Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship. American Journal of Roentgenology, 167 (3): 571–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEGMANN, J., GROHMANN, G. (2001), Citation rates, knowledge export and international visibility of dermatology journals listed and not listed in the Journal Citation Reports. Scientometrics, 50 (3): 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SVEIBY, K. (2001), What is Knowledge Management? [On-line]. Available: http://www.sveiby.com/articles/KnowledgeManagement.html

  • TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (1992), Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mapping with Multidimensional Scaling Methods. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University.

  • TOMOV, D. T., MUTAFOV, H. G. (1996), Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37 (2): 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TRUESWELL, R. L. (1969), Some behavioral patterns of library users: the 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43 (5): 458–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • VAN DEN BESSELAAR, P., HEIMERIKS, G. (2001), Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary Œ concepts and indicators. In: M. DAVIS, C. S. WILSON (Eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Sydney: Bibliometric & Informetric Research Group (BIRG), UNSW.

  • VAN LEEUWEN, T., TIJSSEN, R. (2000), Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9 (3): 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., ZIMMERMANN, E. (2002), Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-I: the multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4 (2): 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tsinghua University, East 4-2-402, Beijing, 100084, P.R.China

    Yinian Gu

Authors
  1. Yinian Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, Y. Global knowledge management research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 61, 171–190 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041647.01086.f4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041647.01086.f4

Keywords

Search

Navigation