Skip to main content
Log in

Statistics of Intuitionistic versus Classical Logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the given logical calculus we investigate the proportion of the number of true formulas of a certain length n to the number of all formulas of such length. We are especially interested in asymptotic behavior of this fraction when n tends to infinity. If the limit exists it is represented by a real number between 0 and 1 which we may call the density of truth for the investigated logic. In this paper we apply this approach to the intuitionistic logic of one variable with implication and negation. The result is obtained by reducing the problem to the same one of Dummett's intermediate linear logic of one variable (see [2]). Actually, this paper shows the exact density of intuitionistic logic and demonstrates that it covers a substantial part (more than 93%) of classical prepositional calculus. Despite using strictly mathematical means to solve all discussed problems, this paper in fact, may have a philosophical impact on understanding how much the phenomenon of truth is sporadic or frequent in random mathematics sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. COMTET, L., Advanced combinatorics. The art of finite and infinite expansions, Revised and enlarged edition, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DUMMETT, M., ‘A propositional calculus with a denumerable matrix’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (1954), 96-107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MOCZURAD, M., J. TYSZKIEWICZ, and M. ZAIONC, ‘Statistical properties of simple types’, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 10 (2000), 575-594.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ROBINS, H., ‘A remark on Stirling formula’, Ammer. Math. Monthly 62 (1955), 26-29.

    Google Scholar 

  5. SZEGÖ, G., ‘Orthogonal polynomials’, AMS, Colloquium Publications, Fourth edition, 23, Providence, 1975.

  6. WILF, H. S., Generatingfunctionology, Second edition, Academic Press, Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ZAIONC, M., ‘On the asymptotic density of tautologies in logic of implication and negation’, submitted to Reports on Mathematical Logic.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kostrzycka, Z., Zaionc, M. Statistics of Intuitionistic versus Classical Logics. Studia Logica 76, 307–328 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STUD.0000032101.88511.93

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:STUD.0000032101.88511.93

Navigation